Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength and Weakness of Situational Leadership
Situational approach to leadership
Situational approach leadership theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strength and Weakness of Situational Leadership
LeadershIp
The contemporary leadership we researched was Situational, Distributed, and Collaborative. We researched all these because we thought that this type of prInciples would make the game more interesting for the players and leaders. I felt that with these principles we would have a chance to show how to effectively apply it, the research we did supposedly told how each principle worked and how to effectively apply it. Some other examples of the research were that what games apply to these principles the most which were for situational was capture the flag, this game was that you had to get the ball and bring it to your side, but when the opponent gets the ball from your goal. The team would have to go from attacking to defensive instantly which show that when a situation changes how a person reacts to the change, for distributed was the four squared game In which the team with the ball had to get the other team out, in this game there was a use of two principles in one collaborative and distributed as an example some people would have to mark the opponent and work together to get the person out. We used Situational, Distributed, Collaborative, we delivered collaboratively and the distributed perfectly because we worked with each other and the rest of the class to work out an outcome since our game wasn't that good and people kept asking if they could change the rules which made us think if we needed more time to execute our game , since we only had 50 mins to play . I felt that we all had a say in how to apply the principles of the group Kent said by playing the game While I went into some depth to try and think how it would affect the game and we as leaders, which came to the conclusion to play more games that would high...
... middle of paper ...
... could only be used when certain situation arised such as when a person to evolve or attain bablance with other peoples needs and mantaining your own needs of the game to achieve what your goal is that was when a person had to get used to changing the rules to benefit the people playign teh game. i thought this principle was really bad to use because of it’s uses.
What is your personal opinion? What happened when using specific leadership principles?
Compare your overall experience as a PAL with research.
Challenge (questions that challenge the leadership principles)
In my opinion we had the challenge of time, completing our choices of games and how we would work with each other. how we would work with each other would be a big issue because we know each other very well, but we have never really worked together and this game would show our flaws.
Conclusion
2) “Attitude reflects leadership, captain”. That shows that Julius is satisfied by the way his captain is thinking. Managerial leadership has influenced organizational activities in many ways. These influences include motivating subordinates, budgeting scarce resources, and serving as a source of communication. We are referring to the LPC contingency theory. "The first and perhaps most popular, situational theory to be advanced was the ‘Contingency Theory of Leadership Effectiveness' developed by Fred E. Fiedler" (Bedeian, Glueck 504). This theory explains that group performance is a result of interaction. (Online reviews)
From the Situational Leadership II Model, the coach is using a high directive and low supportive behavior in which this approach “the leader focuses communication on goal achievement, and spends a smaller amount of time using supportive behaviors.” So just for the coach to tell Michael not to get hit, that simply did not motivate him to do the task. The coach was only being concerned with playing the game the right way. This is where Leigh Anne see’s that the Coach Burt method is not working so she steps in using the high directive and high supportive behavior, which is more appropriate in which she focuses on who Michael is as a person and she relates the game to him in a way he would understand. Leigh Anne as well shows us situational leadership because she adapts to the situation and to Michael’s development level. She even gives him advice that he should get to know his players better, which proves that Leigh Anne has a strong belief that if you know the people you can lead them more effectively. As well we can demonstrate that Leigh Anne has Servant Leadership because she puts her follower first, and helps the follower grow and succeed which is the case of putting Michael first before herself and as well as not caring what others think of her as long as she leads Michael towards the right
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
In this theory leadership style changes as needed to ensure that the goal is achieved (Huber, 2014). Each situation may need to be addressed differently, which requires flexibility by all involved, especially leadership. Managers need to evaluate every individual to understand what they are capable of and how they fit the needs of the institution and or situation (Nash, 2015). As a nurse I think this is a very important trait for a leader to have because of how quickly things change and how we must work within our environment. For example, in healthcare we sometimes have to allow others to take control of a situation on to ensure the best possible outcome for each patient. In addition, the manager needs to ensure that each person works within the scope of their practice, functions at the highest level allowed and completes their tasks. To be a successful leader in healthcare and achieve desired outcomes requires a high level of flexibility by leadership. I would also say that the contingency theory would also fit into my leadership style. The basis premise of this theory is that each situation is different and leadership needs to take that into account when managing a situation (Huber, 2014). At times a leader needs to look at the bigger picture and incorporate that in their decision making process. When looking at a specific situation taking input from all parties involved can lead to a more effective solution. We can learn a lot form those around us and need to take that in account to be an effective
Reflecting on my skills inventory questionnaire, I have determined my technique skill is my strongest area of expertise. I believe these results are accurate because I have always taken pride in my self-sufficiency. I take great measures to have the tools and knowledge to successful complete my tasks. When working in my professional and academic life I am very task oriented. For example, when I was a manager at a Tim Horton’s, I always made sure my followers were working towards the objective of providing fast, quality service. I did not care much for my human interactions or conceptual knowledge of the job. I find my leadership style is quite rigid. I believe the duty of a leader is to accomplish a mutual
When comparing my Big Five Personality scores to the class average, I received a score of 6 and the average was 5.7, one score did not come to a surprise. My personality is reliant on my strength of conscientiousness. Individuals who score high in conscientiousness tend to be methodical, well-organized, achievement orientated, and ethically guided. The conscientious personality type has a strong correlation to leader emergence which I can attest is true. I often am the first individual in the group to take reigns because of my organization, self-discipline, and need to create a plan before acting.
2). Risk – Willing to take on a high risk, and engage in self-sacrifice to
In this particular case study I have chosen to base my study on the scenario number three, “As a manager, you have two employees who have a difficult time working together. While nothing specifically unprofessional has been done by either one of them, other team members have expressed concern that the differences between them are causing tension and some other team members are having difficulty performing their work. Some have even gone so far as to say that the situation is causing a hostile work environment.” The one in which I believe that is always going to be situations and differences that need to be dealt with and two I actually work in this very situation at the time and can relate more to this. The style in which I am most comfortable with in this case study and in real life would be the visionary leadership style. I
Our leadership in this world has changed and affected us greatly. Leadership is being about to lead an organization with many people and to have control in the right way. “ The Leader of the Future” a book by Peter F. Drucker gives us information on why and how it is to be such a great leader. We need better leaders and we need them to guide us and help us along the way. Without leadership, our world would be in such danger and we America would be going through a lot.
Many Scholars characterize the core qualities and skills necessary for an effective leader. Useem defines leadership as “Creating a vision and translating that vision into actions”. Historically, an effective leader was assumed to be exceptionally knowledgeable, authoritative, and dominate. Those leaders applied the command and control method to lead an organization. With the passage of time, this definition has been changed. The modern definition of an effective leader is honest, courageous, trustworthy, inspirational, and result-oriented. Today’s leaders create shared values and vision, and empower others to achieve their targets.
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
The concept of leadership arises out of the need for cooperative action by human beings to achieve certain goals. Leadership seeks to identify and deploy the groups’ pooled resources to tackle problems in order to achieve set objectives. While human beings are independent and capable of individual action, there are many situations in real life that require dependence on one person or a small group of people who have a broad view of the intervening issues enabling them to direct the actions of the rest of the individuals. The degree of success from this effort is a measure of the leadership skill present within a team.
Leadership is defined as a process by which an individual influences others to obtain goals. There are three aspects that should be addressed when explaining leadership. One aspect is that leadership is a social influence process; leadership could not exist without a leader and one or more followers. Another leadership aspect is compliance; all of the leader’s directions must be complied with voluntarily. Compliance is what separates leadership from other influence-based formal authority. Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009).
Leaders require essential leadership skills to effectively lead. The Chief Petty Officer (CPO) Academy teaches those essential skills to enhance leadership ability out in the fleet. During my time at the CPO Academy, I acquired vital knowledge and skills in leadership throughout the classes I took which I will be taking back to the unit. One class that had a significant impact was the Facilitative Leadership class which gave me the tools to effectively run a meeting. In addition, the Change Management class provided me with the skills necessary to support Command Policy and get crew buy-in. Lastly, the Stress Management class imparted me with knowledge on how to deal with stress and mitigate it.
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.