Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research proposal on the effects of motivation on employee performance
The Relationship Between Employee Motivation and Performance
Research proposal on the effects of motivation on employee performance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the first situation, I would take Action C, that is, make the decision myself with reasons. After an assessment of the employees’ capabilities, I would choose the most qualified for the task at hand. Later, I would explain the reasons behind my decision to the workforce to avoid instances of distrust among the employees. The most qualified will be the one chosen to do the task before the impending deadline.
In the second situation, this manager would chose action A. By having an employee volunteer, this manager feels that he or she would more happier to work late than making someone who does not want to be there.
In the third situation, the one that involves the company’s softball team, I would take Action B, that is, seek the opinion of
…show more content…
I would delegate the responsibility of finding the most appropriate restaurant to my associates. The most appropriate need not be the most expensive. However, standards still have to be maintained. Once a thorough research has been conducted and the results handed in, I would make the final decision, putting in mind specific aspects of the suggested …show more content…
Although this kind of leadership style is not always consistent with future predictions, it is the most appropriate regarding the situation that the organization might be in (Von Krogh, 2012, p. 262). From these predictions, managers are in a better position to apply the most appropriate style of leadership, depending on the situation. Thus, this manager feels the actions support his type of leadership skills.
The task behavior terminology is most appropriate in situations where the workforce requires a great deal of supervision and direction from their supervisors (Greenberg, 2013, p. 353). This type of situation is referred to as the telling. This kind of leadership style is also appropriate in situations where the employees are able and willing to do what is required of them.
However, in management, this type of situation is commonly referred to as delegating. Here, the employees do not require a lot of supervisions. They follow directions and instructions given by their managers and supervisors to the letter. However, in delegating, there is a low relationship level between the employee and their
Dave Thomas an American restaurateur and a philanthropist once said, “It all comes back to the basic. Serve customers the best-tasting food at a good value in a clean, comfortable restaurant, and they'll keep coming back.” (thomas). Everyone can agree on Dave Thomas, but I have a couple more criteria to add to his idea of a great successful restaurant. If I go out to eat I might as well pick a place that, though may be expensive, has scrumptious food because why bother going to spend money on food you can make yourself? A great restaurant has to meet three of my criteria’s: the Décor and atmosphere, impeccable service and cleanliness, and most importantly the food.
In the context of the Situational model leadership theory, there are three identifiable weaknesses in my leadership practice. These weaknesses represent shortcomings in my role as a leader and might prevent my team from fully executing the organization’s mission. The three weaknesses are:
According to Fiedler (cited in Bolden, Gosling, Marturano & Dennison, 2003)., there is no single characteristic or trait that will create a successful leadership style. Rather, he argues that situations actually shape a general leadership style of a manager. Bolden, Gosling, Marturano and Dennison (2003) have observed that within an environment with repetitive tasks, the most effective leadership style might be a directive one, while a participative leadership style might be required in a dynamic environment. Being an effective leader means to control important specific situations. Taking into account these situations, Fiedler presented three situational components that are considered essential for an effective leadership: leader-member relations, task-structure and position power.
You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink is a proverb I have heard since I was young. Leadership is the skill of influencing people to accomplish goals (Huber, 2014). In today’s world with policy and technological changes the leaders must use their leadership skills to not only get the horse to the water, have him drink, but also do it with a smile an invite others to join him. Leaders use a variety of styles to accomplish their goals. I will discuss the leadership style that I utilize most often, how my style relates to leadership theories and the work type environment it is most useful in.
Task behavior is the extent to which the leader is devoted to detailing the roles and responsibilities of a person or group. This behavior includes telling people what to do, how to do, when to do, where to do it, and that is to do. Responsible behavior in the task is dedicated to one-way communication. Relationship behavior is the extent to which the leader engages in two-way or multi-way communication. This includes listening, facilitating, and supportive behaviors. In the behavior of the relationship between the leaders engages in two-way communication through socio-emotional sup...
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
I will explain 8 barriers from these things. One of the barrier is Lack of trust. The manager thought the other employees can’t do high quality works as the manager do. The other one is worrying that if the employee do the better job than manager, the manager may lose their job. Thirdly, delegating in hurry so that the manager may chose unsuitable person to complete work properly. The next one is giving too many works to only one person. The person who is delegated would get tired and their quality of work must be worse. Over delegating giving too much at once is also barrier of delegation. It can lead to decrease employee’s motivation and the result of work would be not completed. The next one is that manager fail to recognize and thank the work of employees. So that the employee feel that they don’t want to take the delegating job from the manager. Other one is that the staff think it’s not their responsibility to do manager’s job. That way of thought would prevent the team works. Last barrier is that the staff may resist taking the jobs because they are worrying whether they have enough ability to complete the tasks or not, or they feel uncomfortable with the responsibility. In this case study, there are three barriers existing. First one is “delegation in hurry”. Because she didn’t have enough time to planning delegation when she tried delegating the work at the first time. Therefore her delegation went wrong and it led
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
In the choice making process the supervisor is the key leader who does not permit his kin to contribute in the choice making procedure, rather they are offered headings to take after. This authority style is best for representatives who are normal or poor entertainer on the grounds that in this approach the pioneer watches out for his kin why should assumed perform the assignment on the given headings; this will expand the execution of workers and additionally the
The first leadership style is an S1. According to Management of Organization Behavior the S1 style of leadership is best for an R1 readiness level. The S1 style is “telling”. According to the text the S1 style, “it is appropriate to provide high amounts of guidance but little supportive behavior” (Hersey et al, 2008). The next leadership style is an S2, which is best paired up with a R2 readiness style. According to the text the S2 style is selling, which is defined as, “the leader is providing not only the guidance, but also the opportunity for dialogue and for clarification in order to help the person buy in to what the leader wants” (Hersey et al, 2008). The next leadership style is the S3 style with is the “participating” style and the style would work best with a person who is an R3 readiness level. According to the text the S3 style of leadership is defined as, “the leader’s major role becomes encouraging and communicating. Other descriptors for this style include collaborating, facilitating, and committing” (Hersey et al, 2008). The final leadership style is an S4, which is defined as “delegating”. According to the text the S4 style of leadership includes, “observing and monitoring” (Hersey et al,
Is the act of empowering or giving authority to another person to complete a work task. It provides the crew member with the capacity to make decisions and to complete the task with minimal supervision.
What would it take for you to open your own restaurant?? Many people have dreamed of opening their own restaurant, and many have tried, but what does it really take to do it? Who would you hire to do the job and do the job well? Those are some of the question many people want to know and I’m here to tell you. The how’s, the when’s, the what’s, and the where’s.
...ded once they see that the sales will be increasing and tips will be larger. Good staff will increase good public relations which will result in better business. Marketing a restaurant is the most important part in running a restaurant. If a restaurant is not marketed, no one will know about the restaurant causing it to lose money to operate forcing it to close down. Prices on the menu should always be appealing to the restaurant target market and set towards the products on the menu. It is essential that a restaurant develops its staff to the fullest, for a strong staff creates better sales and the public is pleased .
... Staff cannot be supervised at all times. The younger management may find it harder to hold a certain amount of respect/discipline from certain staff members who previously knew them but on a lower ranking within the business. Ways in which to prevent this is to have the manager evaluate them personally to put in place that they are the boss and need to be respected and can not be walked over through a friendship.
Furthermore, we realise that the types of staff required for the service type can differ and it depends on the restaurant, the theme, the type of service and staffing levels. From the information we gathered, types of service styles, their unique features and pros and cons we can conclude that each service style is unique and all 3 styles can be brought to its highest level, with the addition of highly qualified staff. On the other hand in terms of financial advantage, the Buffet would be best with fine dining last, as there’s less food cost and labour cost with the addition of little to no