Two Types Of 'Administrative Leadership In ASDA'

Administrative leadership in "ASDA" of two types: The first: Official leadership: a leadership exercise its functions in accordance with the approach the organization (rules and regulations) governing the work of the facility. A leader who exercises his functions in this sense be specific powers and responsibilities of his position by the laws and regulations in force. Second: Informal leadership: it is that leadership exercised by certain individuals according to their leadership abilities and talents and not their status and career status. Some of them may be in the executive management level or direct management, but the talents of leadership and strength of character among his colleagues and the ability to act and movement, discussion and persuasion make him a successful

leader. In general, it is indispensable for the two types of leadership in (ASDA), formal and informal leadership is cooperating often to achieve the objectives established and rarely meet, in one person.
Leadership also several methods including: First\ Autocratic style, or authoritarian: Authoritarians leaders insist, or autocrats, to do everything themselves.

They enjoy full authority, and make the decisions all, and often do not tell anyone what they are doing. And often keeps the leader's autocratic, authoritarian, on his power by force or intimidation, or threat of, or reward and punishment, or the use of his position. And although it may have a clear vision or may not be, and directs the organization or not guided in the right direction, but it does not care whether anyone agrees to work or not. In addition, in the autocratic leadership allow to take decisions quickly, and eliminate the debate about how things work and why. But at the same time it may reduce the likelihood of getting a range of different ideas from different people, and they may treat people in a bad way, or if they are not important. If this leader interested in his own authority or position, as often happens, they will be worried and cautious, and will be keen to crush any opposition to him or to his ideas and decisions. Well, it has not allowed the use of innovation or ideas of others unless it is part of his

plan.
Follows that effect in (ASDA): Often autocratic leadership raises the feelings of fear and mistrust of those around them. As well as, others in the organization tends to resemble them in protecting their positions, and in the lack of confidence in the ideas of others and their motives. And organizations with autocratic leadership, or authoritarian, often not particularly supportive personal relationships, but is characterized by a sequence commands much more. Each person has his constituency private and protected at all costs. The communication tends to be limited in only one direction - towards the top - and as a result, rumors may turn into the usual way to spread the news of the organization.In the best cases, autocratic leadership provide a stable and safe working environment, and a decisive and effective leadership. But often they have to sacrifice the initiative, new ideas, individual and collective development of the staff, in order to stabilize the very organized and hierarchical environment, where everyone knows what they are supposed to do specifically, the following orders without any comment. It is true that the above description provides a very negative image, that many of the autocratic leadership are not the focus of hate and fear, but unappreciated, so that they may be unpopular. It is up to their personalities - they like anyone else, may be nice, attractive figures or owners, or even willing to listen to the ideas of others and act upon and on the quality of their decisions, and on the needs of the people who lead them. And if they do not behave insult to people in general, and if they make good decisions for the organization, and are investigating the picture or authoritarian parenting that most people are looking for in the organization, they may be effective and respected.