Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The leader follower realtionship
Leader member exchange theory essay
Leader member exchange theory essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The leader follower realtionship
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Questionnaire
Madhvi Jayarao
Leaders- 481, Northwestern University
April 24, 2015
Questionnaire Results
The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered on the interactions between leaders and followers (Northouse, 2016, p 137). It is not uncommon for leaders to have varying relationships with team members and therefore, not treat all team members equally. There are those team members that they have developed strong relationships because the leader trusts them and the team members have worked hard for them and are reliable. The leader highly values these team members and offers more opportunities and challenges because they belong to the
…show more content…
For this exercise, I rated myself in my various roles; as a leader, as a follower and as a client.
# LMX Questionnaire Leader 1 Leader 2 Follower 1 Follower 2 Client
1 Do you know where you stand with your leader (follower) . . . [and] do you usually know how satisfied your leader is with what you do? 4 3 4 3 4 1- Rarely, 2- Occasionally, 3- Sometimes, 4- Fairly often, 5- Very often
2 2. How well does your leader (follower) understand your job problems and needs? 3 3 4 3 4 1- Not a bit, 2- A little, 3- A fair amount, 4- Quite a bit, 5- A great deal
3 How well does your leader (follower) recognize your potential? 5 4 5 3 5 1- Not at all, 2- A little, 3- Moderately, 4- Mostly, 5- Fully
4 Regardless of how much formal authority your leader (follower) has built into his or her position, what are the chances that your leader (follower) would use his or her power to help you solve problems in your work? 5 4 4 3
…show more content…
4 2 4 4 4 1- Strongly disagree, 2- Disagree, 3- Neutral, 4- Agree, 5- Strongly agree
7 How would you characterize your working relationship with your leader (follower)? 4 3 4 3 4 1-Extremely ineffective, 2- Worse than average, 3- Average, 4- Better than average, 5- Extremely effective Total scores 30 22 29 23 29 Interpretation In-group In-group In-group In-group In-group
Northouse also outlines that the LMX theory also focuses on leadership making which occurs over time and comprises of 3 phases: the stranger phase, the acquaintance phase and the mature relationship phase (Northouse, 2016, p. 142). As I was analyzing my scores, I recognized that each of the relationships that I have evaluated also followed these three phases of first assessing abilities, assuming roles and then continuing the ongoing exchange to establish the relationship between the leader and the member. While all my scores fall within the ‘in-group’ range, there are two that are on the lower side of my
Since I am a huge of assessments, the research was personal assessment heavy with all of the educational and professional assessments I have participated in over the last few years. It is very important for me to see where I fall as an employee, person and leader and make connections to current theories, which then in turn become practice for me in my career. The following assessments provided insight into my current and future leadership styles:
The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory focuses on a dyad relationship. This is a relationship between a leader and each subordinate which are considered independent, rather than on the relationship between the superior and the group. Each linkage, or relationship, is likely to differ in quality. Thus, the same leader may have poor interpersonal relations with some subordinates and open and trusting relations with others. The relationships within these pairings, or dyads, may be of a predominantly in-group or out-group nature.
According to Grossman and Valiga’s Leadership Characteristics and Skills Assessment, the interpretation of scores for perception of what makes a good leader gave me the following results: good perception of a good leader and the scores for perception of your own ability to lead resulted in low perceived leadership ability for myself (Grossman and Valiga, 2013). With these results, I have concluded that I have low confidence in my leadership skills and ability. This would be an area of improvement needing work on my part. Part of being a good leader is being confident in one’s abilities and skills. Who would want to follow a leader who has n...
I chose this assessment because I believe is it important for all leaders to be self-aware of these skills, as all three are needed and continually improve these skills. From this assessment, I
Kelley, R.E. (1992). Followership. In Goethals, G.R., Sorenson, G.J. & Burns, J.M. (Eds.). (2008). Encyclopedia of leadership (pp. 504-513). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
The assignment for week four is to assess and review results from the Authentic Leadership Self Assessment Questionnaire. The ALQ was created to provide a means to assess the parameters of authentic leadership and to allow for opinion on the behaviors that encompass Authentic Leadership Style (Northouse, 2013). Basically, the questionnaire and the model allows and individual to understand how followers or people perceive leadership authenticity.
Gils, S. v., Quaquebeke, N. v., & Knippenberg, D. v. (2009). The X-Factor: On the Relevance of Implicit Leadership and Followership Theories for Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Agreement European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM).
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
But before those examples are discussed, one must know what exactly leadership and followership are. Leadership is broken down into four main categories: autocratic, bureaucratic, democratic, and laissez-faire. Autocratic leaders tend to dictate tasks to others to make sure the work gets done to how they see fit. Bureaucratic leaders use guidelines, rules, and regulations to accomplish tasks.
In organizations aspiring for growth and continual improvement, relationships are more intricate and alternatives more numerous than the either/or imposition implied by the notion of leaders and followers. Practically no one leads all of the time. Leaders also work as followers; all in all, “everyone uses a portion of their day following and another portion leading” (Galie and Bopst, 2006, p. 11).
After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggests leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each person.
In my view, people employ certain traits that differentiate us from our neighbor next door, and leadership is no different. The test produced by the University of Kent in the United Kingdom (University of Kent, n.d.) has developed a process that I feel accurately defines what sort of leader you are based on 50 simple questions. I was not surprised by the results and found them to be quite accurate and expected. In this essay, I will explore why I feel the test is an accurate way to determine your leadership style due to my personal experience with
In addition, an effective leader is always confident and creates shared sense of purpose. Basically, leadership is an attempt that influences and motivates constituents; however, how can an individual assess whether they influence others in a positive way? To help individuals in assessing their leadership competencies, several methods/tools have been developed by scholars; I used Leadership Competences Scorecard Inventory (LCSI) to discover my leadership capabilities.
Many times we can get so busy and wrapped up in our jobs that we may lose sight of how we are actually performing as a leader. Self-Assessment exercises offered in the reading material offer a valid look into strengths as well as opportunities for improvement. The first assessment that began to make me think about my leadership role deals directly with social motives in the work setting.
In (1964, 1967) Fiedler interpreted the LPC score as a personal need in the social context. High LPC subjects were considered to have strong needs to maintain good relationships, while low LPC subjects had strong needs for successful task performance. It was found that high LPC leaders were generally relationship oriented, also. They gained satisfaction and self-esteem from good interpersonal relations. Low LPC leaders. On the other hand, tended to behave in a more task oriented direction. While, they gained most satisfaction and self-esteem from successful task