ABRAHAM LINCON: A Transformational Leader?

717 Words2 Pages

ABRAHAM LINCOLN: A Transformational Leader
Throughout history, there have been leaders who are considered as admirable due to positive influences over other individuals. For example, in my opinion, Abraham Lincoln was able to influence the masses of people because he chose to think and behave differently from other leaders before him. When a person is considered as a leader, there are several responsibilities and qualities that will attract others to follow after the teachings that are demonstrated. Leadership can be described as the process for “guiding individuals, groups, and entire organizations in establishing goals and sustaining action to support goals (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p. 220). Additionally, each leader will usually have a distinctive
With this particular style, leaders are known to have a hands off approach when guiding others, and usually they do not provide the support that may be needed. Furthermore, Laissez-fair leaders allow individuals to make their own decisions without much interference or feedback. In addition to a Laissez-fair leader, there is also the transformational method of leadership. A Transformational leader can be described as a person who “persuades their subordinates to take on the organizational revolution as their own” (Rana, Malik, & Hussain, 2007, p. 163). In addition, transformational leaders also formulate challenging purposes in order to pave the way for others. For example, although Abraham Lincoln was the president of the United States, he volunteered in the Blackhawk War, which proves how caring and selfless he was. He was able to sympathize and relate to others, although it may have been considered as politically incorrect. The last leadership style that has been discussed is known as transactional. With the transactional method of guiding others, there is a “reciprocal exchange” (Rana, Malik, & Hussain, 2007, p. 164) that exists between a leader and subordinates. Focusing on the desired outcome is the main objective with transactional leaders as opposed to focusing to the individuals
Authentic leadership “emphasizes a leader imprinting their personality of honesty and integrity in an organization” (Hegarty & Cusack, 2016, p. 68). This is a leader who focuses on building relationships through honesty and input from others. After authentic leadership, there are others who prefer to use the servant leadership theory. Abraham Lincoln is an example of a servant leader. During the timeframe of his presidency, he contributed to preserving the Union and also freeing the slaves, which shows his willingness to commit for the greater good of people (The people’s forum, 2016). The servant theory “explores how a leader enables followers to be more effective by showing concern for their well-being” (Hegarty & Cusack, 2016, p. 68) which is what Abraham Lincoln stood for. After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggest leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each

Open Document