Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength of authentic leadership
Strength of authentic leadership
Leadership five key elements
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The assignment for week four is to assess and review results from the Authentic Leadership Self Assessment Questionnaire. The ALQ was created to provide a means to assess the parameters of authentic leadership and to allow for opinion on the behaviors that encompass Authentic Leadership Style (Northouse, 2013). Basically, the questionnaire and the model allows and individual to understand how followers or people perceive leadership authenticity. In an effort to understand the questionnaire, one must first understand the definition of an Authentic Leader. Genuine, trustworthy and reliable are a few words that are interchangeable with the term authentic. Authentic leaders exhibit qualities of confidence, transparency, and high moral standard and are usually very confident (Gardner, Avolio, Luthans, May and Walumbwa, 2005). A person that is considered to be authentic is one who taking account for their behavior and a person who is true to themselves and what they think. A quality of an authentic leader is that he/she exudes the level of authenticity through their actions that encourage others to want to behave the same way. The leader who acts in this manner believes that all individuals have something to contribute to a goal and …show more content…
The breakdown was as follows, in the area of self-awareness, the score was a 19, in the area of internalized moral perspective, the score was a 19, in the area of balanced processing, the score was a 14 and in the area of relational transparency, the score was a 15. The total scores received reflected high self-awareness and internalized moral prospective and low balanced processing and relational transparency (Northouse, 2013). The higher scores were indicative of me being a strongly authentic, whereas, the lower scores showed that there was some weakness in authentic leadership (Northouse,
Assessment tools can be a good start for individuals to assess their leadership characteristics and skills, such as Grossman and Valiga’s Leadership Characteristcs and Skills Assessment (Grossman and Valiga, 2013). These tools may be helpful but its accuracy is questionable. The assessment can overestimate or underestimate an individual’s skills since it is a self-subjective administered assessment that is biased towards the taker. An overconfident person may perceive their skills highly and an under confident person may have low results.
The role of leadership has become increasing valuable for organizations to be successful. According to Huber (2014), Leadership can best be defined as method utilized to ensure that an objective is completed. There are many different types of leaderships that can be found within each organization. In this paper I will highlight an example of a specific leadership style that we come across in healthcare settings. I will review my leadership self-assessment results and discuss the impact of leadership on staff and groups.
A person’s title within the organization does not make them a leader. The driving factor which determines if someone is in a leader position is their behavior. This person who is a leader will guide those in the organization by influencing, guiding, giving direction, and opinions (Marquis & Huston, 2012). The culture as well as the climate of an organization begins with the leadership (Azaare & Gross, 2011). Each individual person has their own leadership style. Knowing one’s own leadership style will help them understand themselves and be able to grow as a leader. The purpose of this paper is to look at my own leadership style, including my strengths for leading others. A description of a potential challenge that I foresee due to my leadership style and a plan for my personal leadership development will be discussed.
While due to the reason that Authentic Leadership is still in the formative phase, the textbook by Northouse provides different definitions of this type of leadership depending on the viewpoints that make this leadership style very broad compared to other more defined leadership styles, I do find Authentic Leadership as a compelling theory. While it is a broad style, it is also very complete by having different approaches that fulfill the goal of explaining the different components of this style. This leadership style has four skills need as Northouse (2016) describes that “ it is important for leaders to have self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing, and a relational transparency to be authentic” (pg. 206), as
The first assessment I completed was very eye opening for me as a leader. As expected, my score for the overall potential of my leadership was on the higher end of the scale because of my background and amount of experience I have in leadership positions. This assessment portrayed a very accurate depiction of my overall leadership potential because I have always placed emphasis on being very good at what I do while working hard to not follow a path that did not work the first time.
1. Self-Awareness (“Know Thyself”). A prerequisite for being an authentic leader knows your own strengths, limitations, and values. Knowing what you stand for and what you value is critical. Moreover, self-awareness is needed in order to develop the other components of authentic leadership.
To be an authentic leader one must discover their True North and the purpose of leadership. Leadership decides the success or failure of organizations. The chief cause of organizational failure for the last decade has been failed leadership. A leader’s
We were administered two assessment tests name of the tests. The self-assessment we were given were based on leadership and emotional intelligence. grid Leadership assessment tests us on if we liking working with people or on tasks. There are four dimensions where our results could fall under, country club (1 on task, 9 on people), authoritative (9 on task and 1 on people), improvised (1 on task and 1 on people) and team leader (9 on task and 9 on people). On the managerial grid I got 7 on the concern for people axis and 7.5 for concern for task axis. This indicates that I am a balanced leader with high concern for task and people
In the same sense, authentic leaders can impact the engagement and performance of followers (Gardner et al., 2005), whereas Howell and Avolio (1993) assert that transformational leader behavior has been linked to the effectiveness of the leader, follower satisfaction and effort, and overall organizational performance. Additionally, the charisma of the leader has a positive impact on performance regardless of the level of support for innovation (Gardner et al., 2005). Peterson et al., (2012) were able to demonstrate that the relationship between CEO antecedents (narcissism and founder status) and CEO servant leadership was mediated by identification with the organization. On the other hand, despite the similarities between the three models of leadership there are some differences between transformational, servant, and authentic leadership. Transformational leaders have a more focus on stimulating followers intellectually than the other two models. servant leadership emphasize on the development of followers through facilitating their personal growth whereas transformation leaders focus on improving the ability of employees to be innovative and creative, authentic leaders facilitate the development of their follower through role modeling. The quality of authenticity is desirable in all people regardless of their position or aspirations for leadership roles. Although, authenticity is an important character in leaders, it does not mean that each authentic individual will naturally emerge as a leader (Gardner et al.,
In addition, an effective leader is always confident and creates shared sense of purpose. Basically, leadership is an attempt that influences and motivates constituents; however, how can an individual assess whether they influence others in a positive way? To help individuals in assessing their leadership competencies, several methods/tools have been developed by scholars; I used Leadership Competences Scorecard Inventory (LCSI) to discover my leadership capabilities.
Authentic Leadership is defined as “a pattern that draws upon and promotes both positive psychological capacities and a positive ethical climate, to foster greater self-awareness, an internalized moral perspective, balanced processing of information, and relational transparency on the part of leaders working with followers, fostering positive self-development” (Walumba, Avolio, Gardner, & Peterson 2008, 94). An authentic leader is someone who is very self-aware, has a clear moral center, is transparent, and is fair or balanced decision maker (Avolio 2009, 727). Authentic is defined as “of disputed origin and not a copy; genuine” Authentic leaders are coaches and mentors, inspiring others and empowering their teammates to lead through the most important tasks without a great deal of supervision. However, at times they have to make tough decisions to go against the group to stay true to their values. Being authentic ultimately means being true to yourself, open to others and being honest (Connell n.d.).
Leaders represent a diverse array of individuals, with their leadership styles as varied as the individuals themselves. It can be easily argued that some leadership styles are superior to others. Yet, regardless of an individual’s personal journey to becoming a leader, the scholar pursuing a doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree is assumed to possess leadership qualities equipping him/her to serve in a complex environment (Rodriguez, 2016). One does not simply achieve such competency without purposeful, directed actions. Thus, described in subsequent paragraphs are the competencies expected of a family nurse practitioner with a DNP degree. The results of a 360˚ evaluation are reviewed, along with the author’s personal assessment of strengths and weaknesses. Lastly, a leadership development action plan and personal philosophy of leadership are described in detail.
According to Bryant (2016), “self-leadership is the process by which you influence yourself to achieve your objectives.” So how do you achieve this, you start with developing your leadership point of view. Developing my leadership point of view forced me to reflect on the leader models in my life. It also forced me to evaluate the key events and experiences from my past and determine how they have impacted me as a leader. This self-reflection process allowed me to discover who I am, what my values and beliefs are and what my true purpose is in life. Thus far, this process has made me more self-aware and self-awareness is key to self-motivation and motivating others.
I need to stop doing projects which are not necessary and concerning myself with things I cannot control. The Seek First to Understand category asked questions about areas of my life and leadership which make me very proud. I pride myself on being sensitive to the feelings of others and trying to see things from their point of view. I believe everyone has a right to their opinions and I do not have the right to make them feel bad about their thoughts. If I feel they are thinking incorrectly, then I take the time to work with them to understand how their thought is incorrect and help them to understand. In the Think Win-Win category I had the highest results. I work extremely well with others and try to find results which will benefit everyone
Throughout the years the discussion of effective leadership has altered and taken many different perceptions as to what makes an influential leader, as well as how does one measure their own leadership. Perspectives have transition from focusing on a leader’s traits and skills to more complex theories of leader/follower relationships to determine what qualities and strategies make for effective leadership. Through these different perspectives and theories researchers have developed an array of leadership self-assessments that assist people with measuring their leadership. As any great leader should do, they should be aware of the strengths, but most importantly their weaknesses in leadership and reflect as to why they’re strengths and weaknesses.