Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leader member exchange theory example
Christian and servant leadership
Christian and servant leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Leader member exchange theory example
The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory focuses on a dyad relationship. This is a relationship between a leader and each subordinate which are considered independent, rather than on the relationship between the superior and the group. Each linkage, or relationship, is likely to differ in quality. Thus, the same leader may have poor interpersonal relations with some subordinates and open and trusting relations with others. The relationships within these pairings, or dyads, may be of a predominantly in-group or out-group nature.
A leader initiates either an in-group or an out-group exchange with a member of the organization early in the relationship. Members of the in-group are invited to participate in decision making and are given added responsibility. The leader allows these members some latitude in their roles. The leader and key subordinates negotiate the responsibilities in a non-contractual exchange
…show more content…
God sent Jesus to be a servant leader and to die for our sins so that we may live. He did not exclude on group just because they were His favorite. He treated everyone with equality and love, no matter their race, background or culture. As Christian leaders, we must strive to be servant leaders and not like the LMX theory. It is impossible to build a successful organization if a leader treats one group of people with dignity and respect, while treating the others like outcasts. In 1 John 13:1-7, Jesus set an important example of how to be an effective servant leader. He washed the feet of his followers which showed that his motivation was love for his followers and He did not want to show he was a Master over others. He knew that he was a servant leader and washing his follower’s feet was not asked of him. However, He wanted to do it as an example to his followers to show that leaders can service others when they see the need to. This is the type of leadership every organization
Denisco & Barker, (2016) discusses the foundation of leadership and the four conceptual pillars that comprise it. Understanding the leadership is a responsibility of an APN, the following final question was posed to Ms. Gordner. “Of the four pillars of leadership; professionalism, inspirational motivation, interpersonal relationships, and business skills, do you feel that one is more important than another, and why?” She responded,
He spends his last few hours of freedom before his death washing all twelve disciples' feet and drying them. Pope Francis Re creating this ritual was intended to send a message to the people whose feet were being washed. In source 2, the people’s feet being washed were inmates of a juvenile prison, who are considered vulnerable people in society. The twelve inmates were of different nationalities and religions. The Pope washed, dried and kissed the inmates feet which is the ultimate act of humility. Jesus originally did this to his disciples. To show that their lives must be one of servitude to others especially those most vulnerable. By the leader of the Catholic church doing this ritual it highlights the present themes of the Catholic church of servitude to others and shows that even the Pope lives a life of servitude to others. In this case, the servitude is for the vulnerable, which the pope is trying to show the values that contemporary Catholicism represents. Besides the washing of the feet Pope Francis also say’s “do not give up on hope, but rather look to God for an answer”. This is meant to show God’s forgiveness and grace by giving them an avenue where they can consolidate themselves through God. This is despite breaking the law and possibly not being of the Catholic faith, Pope Francis actions it shows God’s grace. This act of love
Chapter 12.3 discusses approaches to leadership. The leadership theory of Leader-Member Exchange suggests that “leaders adopt different behaviors with individual subordinates and that the particular behavior pattern of the leader develops over time and depends, to a large extent, on the quality of the leader-subordinate relationship” (Landy & Conte, 2013, p. 494). In essence, this leadership theory references how close the leader is with the staff member. Is there a feeling of trust? Is the staff member one that holds expertise in their role that the leader can rely on? Building a relationship with a staff member doesn’t happen instantly. The relationship grows over time which can result in staff members being a close confidante to the
According to Dr. Karlene Kerfoot, “research tells us that the leadership traits of the person in charge work either as a magnet to attract, retain, and inspire or as a force that repels” (Kerfoot 2006, p. 25) and in support of this statement she makes reference to the fact that many persons go to work for a specific company with enthusiasm and eagerness and ultimately leave disappointed because of the management. “People are generally hungry for personalized leadership that speaks to their hearts”, says Dr.Kerfoot and this type of leadership motivates them to accomplish task and complete projects they deem difficult or impossible (Kerfoot 2006, p. 25)
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, positive role models were not present in my everyday life. Fortunately, I created a personal understanding of what it took to be a true leader when Marcelo Neveleff became my coach. Coach Marcelo was my club soccer coach throughout my teenage years, and Marcelo demonstrated three key tenets that made me realize what it took to be a great leader. From his guidance and inspiration, I have drawn that in order to become a successful leader, I must be goal oriented through determination within myself by leading from the front. This reflects that there is a specific goal that I, as a leader, must be willing to reach that will inspire others to do the same. To become a successful leader, I must also be empathetic
Rost, J.C. (1991). Leaders and Followers are the People in this Relationship. In Wren, J.T. (Ed.). (1995). The Leader’s Companion (pp. 189-192). New York: Simon & Schuster.
Cultivating a strong team comes from casting by individual strengths; providing a strength based approach to the work compared to a deficiency approach. “The LMX model focuses on the unique relationship-based exchange between a leader and followers (Nahavandi, 2015).” True diversity comes from the subtle differences between individuals. A competent LMX leader will be able to tailor their real life experiences to their leadership style, incorporating a high level of respect, deeper trust, and continually growing relationships with followers (Nahavandi, 2015). Essentially, Acme Airlines is asking managers to create “in-groups” for the flight attendants to build trust and emotional bonds (Nahavandi, 2015). Nahavandi (2015) cautions from selecting in-group members based on personal relationships, instead focusing on creating a workable team. In-group responsibilities might be to specific domiciles or perhaps to training and building relationships with new flight attendants. Effective in-groups of flight attendants would meet a wide variety of needs for all flight attendants as well as keep membership fluid (Nahavandi, 2015). For Acme Airlines to continue to be proactive in their leadership, deepening the experience of in-groups to become leaders provides more connection to the work; giving individuals more purpose. If two in-group members were tasked with creating their own in-group, there
The Keller Case Paper describes Wolfgang Keller and the way he is trying to turn around the Konigsbrau-Hellas beer company subsidiary in Greece. In this paper, the leadership style that Keller was effective in using as well as the business concepts that made him an effective leader will be further explained.
Organizational justice and motivational theories, like the equity theory, may be used to attain this (Greenberg, J., 2013). Since GM seeks to make their employees speak up, it may come up with a system where those who speak up will not only be recognized, but will also be rewarded with both tangible and intangible incentives. A review of how the leadership is in GM can also help address its problems. The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership focuses on the dynamic relationship between supervisors and subordinates (Clemens, E. V., Milsom, A., & Cashwell, C. S., 2009).
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
In organizations aspiring for growth and continual improvement, relationships are more intricate and alternatives more numerous than the either/or imposition implied by the notion of leaders and followers. Practically no one leads all of the time. Leaders also work as followers; all in all, “everyone uses a portion of their day following and another portion leading” (Galie and Bopst, 2006, p. 11).
After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggests leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each person.
Loving people unconditionally was another aspect of Jesus’ worship lifestyle. The Gospels depict countless examples of Jesus interacting with people. Every interaction was filled with love. He met people’s needs when he healed the sick and the blind and the dumb. He met the needs of the hungry thousands. The marginalized of society were always on His mind. From the women to the children, the aliens and the outcasts, He was a...
One of the most important components of leadership is the leader. A leader is responsible for his or her followers and the overall goal of the group or organization. Leaders are the people held accountable or everything that happens, good or bad. On the other hand, the second major component of leadership is the followers. Without followers, a leader would be worthless. Followers make up the backbone of a leader because they are the masses that get goals accomplished. A leader is just one person, but the number of followers is countless. In order to be an effective follower, there are a countless number of characteristics that allow a follower to be the best they can be. Five of these characteristics include a positive attitude, communication skills, being part of the process, being open to new ideas, and patience.
...adership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale." In D. Cartwright and A. Zander, Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. (Elmsford, NY: Row, Paterson, 1960)