Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Autocratic management style pros and cons
Strengths and weaknesses of autocratic leadership styles
Advantages and disadvantages of autocratic leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Autocratic management style pros and cons
Autocratic style of leadership is the sole decision making of one person. The person in charge decides what is right solely on their beliefs. They disregard any rules, regulations and others thoughts. This is a type of dictatorship and has many disadvantages. The only advantage or way that this style works is by no one taking responsibility or initiative. The leader would not allow for this type of participation from any members other than themselves. This causes a form of resentment from all parties involved and sets the leader up for failure. Not only do those he is leading not like the leader but also he is at a disadvantage if he is not an expert in a wide range of areas.
Bureaucratic style of leadership is known as the just and fair style of leading. This is due to everything being decided according to the policies and procedures that are set forth. All decisions are solely made on what should be done based on rules and consulting a superior when there is no rule in place the decision. This type of leadership has limitations because it cannot adapt to different situations. Since everything is decided directly by the book it doesn’t allow for flexibility
…show more content…
The style of referring to policies and procedures is a great way to lead because it takes the opinion out of decision-making. This allows for decisions to be made as justly as possible. However, bureaucratic has the limitations of not allowing for flexibility. That’s where the mix of participative leadership would come in. This allows for decisions to be made on a need by need basis. The members consult each other when the rules don’t quite apply. This allows for members to feel as though they are individuals and concerns are relevant. This mix gives the best balance for leadership. The leader is in charge and making decisions on a fair bases but allowing for contribution from all parties
Hospital emergency room is a place which requires high efficiency and precision of job performance. Apart from that, it is also a place where many routine jobs are performed daily by healthcare team following a strict set of rules. In 1947, Max Weber explained about the bureaucratic style saying that following normative rules and adhering to lines of authority are the basis. This type of leadership is beneficial in the management where not much creativity and innovation are expected from the team members. On top of that, the bureaucratic leadership is useful for a job which is routine based and a definite set of safety regulations or guidelines.
Following this, I’ll contrast the argument by drawing upon Shackleton’s “leadership in the face of crisis” (Browning 2007 pg198) suggesting that the changes in practices within the post-bureaucratic era have “branched” and remained influenced by bureaucratic leadership styles (Grahn 2008). In section two, I discuss the changes in the “pedagogy” of leadership development through the practices of an organisation and how such courses transfer theoretical learning of leadership to a practical application (Herman 2007). Following this, I attempt to compare Meindi’s (1997) Article “the romance of leadership” considering the strong romanticised conception of leadership, being a strong part of social reality. In doing so exhibit, that bureaucracy has not been “suppressed” but rather ”refurbished”. Finally, within the conclusion I propose my views on bureaucracy being inherent within contemporary post-bureaucracy society, becoming a “hybrid” form as Clegg and Courpasson (2004)
To think one style of leadership is the only style seems rather pompous. You have several different types and brands of blood pressure pills to lower the blood pressure depending on the cause, therefore why would we think we only need one type of leader. At times I am needed to make a decision that I do not ask for outside participation. For example the attendance policy. I decided what would be a fair policy, how many points would be assigned for each call off and how long each point would stay active for. The situation did not need a meeting, it did not need input for others. I utilized a laisse fair style when the nurses were complaining about medication pass times. I simply gave them the task to develop a standardized medication time and let me know. When I hold a risk meeting I have several nurses and other disciplines present to assist at problem solving risk behaviors and that also means trying new techniques. Every situation is different and it is my responsibility, as the leader, to know which style would work best in each situation; sometimes it also depends on the people involved. Some staff need a leader to stand back more, others need one to effectively manage them. So not only do I have to know the situation, I also need to be sensitive to the persons involved, why it is important for me to know the staff I work
This style has been defined as ( Abdicates responsibilities avoid making decisions)(Robbins 2001). That would mean leaders are not involved in taking decisions at all and they are available only to provide their employees with materials and answering questions, the subordinates have complete freedom to take decisions and set objectives (Chaudhry and Husnain 2012). In other words, this theory lacks any kind on powerful leadership. Hence, there would be lack of motivation, low levels of performance, and poor work practices(Packard 2009). However, if the employees are already motivated and have full understanding and high level of knowledge regarding the mission at hand, Lassies- Faire model might works fine (Gustainis and Roosevelt 2004) .
...esearch of the situation. This leadership style is beneficial in situations where a quick decision is necessary. The downside to this type of leadership is people who tend to use an autocratic leadership style are seen as controlling and dictatorial. This type of behavior can lead to resentment with the other group members.
It is the nature, vision, and upbringing of the leader which helps them to determine which leadership theory fits them the most. A leader is the one who helps others to accomplish the goals. If there is any kind of intervention in the leadership style then most probably it would fail as the employee would be no more interested to work under the leader. A leader is someone who inspires others, helps them to view a goal and motivates them to achieve the goal. In a workplace, leaders come and go but the important thing is that leader who inspires others will leave a mark for the lifetime. Being a leader is not a difficult job, but leadership faces a jeopardy situation when a leader is incapable to answering the why and how questions. So, one should be very careful while acting as a
The result is a relaxed atmosphere, but one where there are dew guidelines and directions. This can sometimes result in poor productivity and lack of motivation as employees have little incentive to work hard. Autocratic leaders centralize power and decision making in themselves. They structure the complete work situation for their employees, who are expected to do what they are told and not think for themselves.
In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
Autocratic I (A1). The leader takes a decision completely at his discretion without the knowledge or consent of the team members in this style of leadership. This style of decision making is possible only in cases where there is not a lot at stake with the out come of this decision, when the employees’ decision is not exactly crucial for the outcome of the project, or when a leader thinks decision can be arrived at based on the information at hand and thinks any additional information isn’t needed from the team members to take a good and calculated decision.
The leadership style that was possessed here was autocratic leadership. Autocratic leadership involves the leader making decisions and using power to control the situation and others Kelly, P.,
). Burke et al (2006) suggested that transactional leadership, based on contingent rewards, can have a positive effect on followers' satisfaction and performance. However, a transactional leader focuses on management tasks, and will not identify shared values of a team. By contrast, transformational leaders inspire others with their vision and work together with their team to identify common values (Marquis and Huston 2009). The transactional approach is task-orientated and can be effective when meeting deadlines, or in emergencies such as when dealing with a cardiac arrest. This approach can lead to non-holistic patient care, because nurses focus on the task they need to complete, rather than the patient as a whole (Bach and Ellis 2011).
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
Autocratic leaders also known as authoritarian leaders are leaders that have absolute authority over subordinates, are in control of the situation they are in, dictate and enforce orders, rarely consult with or ask opinions of others, are highly task driven, and the emotional needs of people are a low priority. The advantage of an Autocratic leader is they typically achieve results quickly; they would make a great leader during the time of crisis or when a project
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)