Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strengths and weaknesses of participative leaders
Style of leadership style
Leadership theories and styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Strengths and weaknesses of participative leaders
Leadership style is the manner in which a leader provides directions, implement plans, and motivate people or a team to achieve a goal (Newlink, 1997). After reading the course work study and taking a leadership style quiz on the web. (About.com, 2014). It is my conclusion that my leadership style is participative. In Participative leadership style, members of the group are allowed to identify goals and develop strategies to reach the goal. As a participative leader, I do not shove my ideals into my member’s throats or impose my decision on everyone. Though the final decision rested with me, each member of the group is still giving an opportunity to express their view and knowledge of the task at hand. Each member’s suggestion is taken into account and the final decision is made based on the suggestions. Therefore, I serve as a facilitator, not a dictator.
A1a. Strength:
Major Key strengths of participative leadership style are job satisfaction and productivity. When employees are given the opportunity to be involved in the decision-making process in an organization; it increases their morale and gives them the sense of inclusion. The employees will likely develop a sense of commitment to the organization, as well as increase their job performances resulting in overall organizational productivity. When employees notice their employers are involving them in the company’s decision making process, their job satisfaction level will be increased benefiting the company in the end.
Another valuable strength of participative leadership style is better decision making. As the old saying goes,” two heads are better than one” when it comes to decision making. This is the reason why the board of directors is more than one person. It is imposs...
... middle of paper ...
...ree leadership styles discussed are different, each of the styles has its own advantages and disadvantages. However, there are some similarities between the styles that present an opportunity for synergism. Identifying the potentials and capitalizing on them will positively increase the team productivity. It is obvious the three leadership styles have the desire to arrive at a concrete and educative decision and influence the team with directions.
The team can capitalize on each leader’s desire to achieve its goal by acknowledging the importance of collaboration within the team with freedom (participative, laissez-faire leadership style), and the importance of giving adequate and educative directions (Autocratic style). The inclusion of the three leadership styles will satisfy each leader, gives value to their styles and ultimately increase the team’s productivity
In the past, decision making was a consensus among managers. They would debate for months on specific decisions that would impact each department. This type of participative leadership was what had worked in the past and driven
A participative leader consults with followers, obtains their ideas and opinions, and integrates their suggestions into the decisions about how the group or organization will proceed” (Northouse, 2016, p.118). As a participative leader, Vida often consults with her staff, obtains their ideas and opinions, and is open minded to their suggestions. For example letting us have flexible hours, because most of us were taking other classes, getting our ideas for recording sessions, and even choosing what snacks we wanted to have available at the
Based on the leadership survey, my leadership style is participative in nature. According to Huber (2014), this style of leadership is characteristic of a leader that takes part in completing the assigned task. When I
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
To best meet the needs of business today the transformational and the team approach leadership styles seem to provide solid solutions. Leaders who are informed and make an effort to include followers in decision making are better equipped to lead a workforce that is equally informed and able to contribute on an equal basis. Transparency among management leads to a collective involvement amongst employees that can be invested in and improved upon from within. As individuals within an organization feel their input and expertise is requested, utilized, and implemented their passion and overall buy in to the organizations goals and mission is inevitably higher.
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
This week we were asked to take a leadership style assessment to find out what is our leadership style. The assessment was developed by the University of Kent, from the United Kingdom. The five modern leadership styles are authoritative, procedural, transformational, participative, and laissez-faire. In this paper we will discover what my leadership style is and how I use it in real life situations.
Three primary leadership styles are participative, delegative and authoritarian. I have more of the leader ship style or participative. I Love for everyone to put some effort into every group work project of life project I have. I’m not the type of person to leave someone out. Participative is
After reading throughout all the varying leadership styles, I quickly determined that I am much more of a participative leader. I value input from my colleagues and those around me before I make any decision. I want everyone I work with to feel like they had a part to play in whatever project we are tackling. I am a firm believer in the belief that communication is crucial and critical to any type of success. I believe that by taking everyone’s thoughts, and contributions into effect it increases productivity as well as participation. When someone feels like they are an integral part of the decision making process and they feel relevant, their level of commitment increases substantially, in my opinion.
Halal and Brown (1981) write that participative management may not only increase productivity and decrease operating costs associated with low morale, it may enhance flexibility through lowering the decision making process to the operational level. This is because the operational level is where the actual work is completed. The manager or supervisor does not always have the best picture of how a process is completed, and they can get lost in the details. The operational level knows the details, thus to work together collaboratively is key. According to Mooney (n.d.) the participative leader empowers others. This is someone who is willing to share the spotlight by giving their employees the opportunity to make major decisions. They are also there to support these workers when they make mistakes and need help in solving problems. This leader invests much of their own success by placing it in the hands of those they
Throughout my life, I have been fortunate to have many opportunities to take on leadership roles, and to use these roles to influence others in very positive ways. After taking the leadership quizzes or survey, I was able to determine that my personal leadership style is Participative. Participative style is the leadership style where a leader gives team the opportunity to wholly take part in
So what does this definition mean to me? First, it means that leaders who embrace a participative leadership style, values and involves their entire team. Second, it means leaders work closely with their team members, focusing on building relationships and rapport. Lastly, it means that leaders allow their team to assist in the decision making process, accepting their input and allowing them to share their ideas. As a leader, I would incorporate this style of leadership when leading project teams because it creates a level of trust between a leader and its members. In addition, this leadership style creates motivation and empowerment. When team member’s skills are acknowledged and their opinions are being valued, they see how their contributions aid in completing the final project goal and take ownership. This type of leadership also provides higher levels of motivation and better strategies and solutions because a variety of people contribute with different perspectives and ideas. Although the team leader is required to give up some control, I believe that the motivational benefits of doing so are greater than with other leadership styles. According to Lam, Xu & Chan (2015), “many practicing managers acknowledge the potential motivational benefits of participative management practice, and value its performance implications” (p. 836). I would
Participative leaders or better known as democratic leaders include team members and others, but making the final decision is up to the participative leader. Participative leaders build confidence and knowledge within team members because their inputs matter within decision making. It helps team members think their opinions help with decisions. If there is change that needs to be implemented a participative leader helps team members understand the change in positive way. I would definitely consider myself a participative leader because I love gathering as many opinions from people just in case I don’t see the situation from another point. It helps me put everything in a good perspective.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)