Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The importance of teamwork skills
Conflict management in teamwork
The importance of teamwork skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The importance of teamwork skills
As said by Bill Richardson, “We cannot accomplish all that we need to do without working together”, but that is easier said, than done. The often rumored and associated nightmares one experiences with group work certainly may result in poor attitudes and approaches of the members. This may be the cause of the challenges faced in the groups. In the first group, all of the members were anxious to solve the case, because of this there were more opinions to consider. This made the whole process challenging. I noticed that some people, like myself, automatically took the leadership position. However, some of those people were a bit harsh when it came to considering the opinions of others, and appeared condescending at times. When this would happen …show more content…
This caused a few problems within the group, but this helped with generating different and more developed ideas. I also enjoyed the creativity within the group. Everyone had different ideas, and this helped to make the assignment enjoyable and a bit humorous at times. Working in the second group also provided me with an interesting experience. Much disagreement took place with this assignment, because of the personal aspect of it. Everyone had a need to stay alive. It may be assumed that each group member would agree on the items essential for living, but the views on what was most important were different. This caused divergence to occur within the group, but eventually we all came to an agreement. One component of the second assignment that I enjoyed was how some of the members tried to persuade the group members by providing raw facts that would prove the significance and importance of the particular …show more content…
In the first group assignment there were more people and more opinions. With the many opinions, coming to an agreement was more difficult in this group. In the second and third group assignments there were also contrasting opinions, but because of the smaller size of the group it was easier to come to an agreement.
Group assignments one and two both had similarities. In both groups the members were anxious when it came to having the correct information. With group one the members needed to discover who committed murder. In the second group the members were anxious to stay alive. With each exercise the members had a goal that they wanted to
This assignment is going to have two parts for two different grades. Everyone in your assigned group will need to complete part one before continuing to complete part two. The more you use your time wisely for part one the more time you will have to complete part two.
Normally in a group, the work will be divided into the number of members in the group and may be arranged to each of the members to receive the part where they are more confident and have more knowledge of it. In addition, if a member is confused with their work, he can receive assistance from his teammates rather than just being alone and figure it himself independently. However, I believe sometimes been in a group can have its cons. A common pitfall associated with working as a group is disagreement about the way something is being done, a particular issue, or an opinion. Sometimes one member might have his own beliefs and want to perform a task in their way and conflict can arise from this. Once conflict arises, the members can discuss their own opinions and might arrive to a solution, but this can cause a member to not show their full potential because something was not done the way they wanted. I believe this is very common but if you are open minded, it can be overcome for the sake of the team to be
We believe this was the moment our group began to transition into the Norming Stage. During this part of the assignment it was crucial for us to communicate effectively in order to ensure that everyone had an understanding of what was required from each perspective. Thus, once we began the research, everyone did a great job of keeping the group goal in mind by finding sources that could be used for every perspective. Additionally, each member kept their personal goals in mind and submitted the required research to our shared document at the agreed upon time. This was a perfect example of how we dealt with a group dialectic. Another dialectic arose when it came time to finalizing who would present each perspective. Some of the group members did not want certain perspectives because they did not have as much knowledge in that subject area as other members did. Furthermore, some group members did not want a certain perspective because their personal opinion might have had an effect on the assignment. In the end, we were able to balance the heterogeneous and homogeneous characteristics of our group members by asking questions, having trust and exhibiting strong communication
When working on a group project, there are certain skills that are required to make sure that the tasks are being carried out smoothly. With that in mind, it is critical to keep an open line of communication as well as an understanding of the other individuals in the group. The following scenario is of a group project I was a part of that had a breakdown in the two points expressed above.
Each individual is categorized into a group from the day they were conceived. According to Kozier et al (2010) a group is “two are more people who have shared need and goals, who taken each other in account in their and who, thus, are held together and set apart from others by virtue of their interaction” (p. 400). The communicate that takes place between members of the group is group dynamic (Kozier et al, 2010). Motivation for participation and similarity of other group members and the goals of the group will affect the group dynamic (Kozier et al, 2010). The type of group that was created was a task group and Kozier et al (2010) stated that “the focus for such group is completion of a specific task, and the format is defined at the outset by the leader or members” (p.400). The purpose of the group was to choose a community health care organization, and then presents the information to the class. To increase the student understandings of what a community health organization is; to demonstrate understanding of community based health care nursing practice. To provided information on the different aspects of the community health organization and to identify various roles of nurses within the community health organization. In order for a group to be effective, three functions are required. It must maintain a degree of group unity, it needs to develop and modified its structure to improve its effectiveness and it must accomplish its goals (Kozier et al, 2010).
In order to evaluate my role within the group, it is important to identify what makes a group. A group must firstly consist of more than three members, “Two members have personal relationships; with three or more there is a change in quality” of the personal relationship. (Bion 1961, p26) The group must have a common purpose or a goal in order to succeed. Having now completed my group work task, I can look back and reflect upon the process that my group went through to get to the presentation end point.
We all respected and encouraged the views of others and we equally contributed to the decision making process. Our group was very active, when we were at home we exchange our information and idea through email. When we discussed we all used our verbal and non-verbal communication with the full power, which was really a fun part. If we had any problem over our subject "we collaborated by discussing the issues, describing feelings, and identifying the characteristics of a solution that would satisfy everyone" (Chapter 8,
All the team members were well aware of their individual roles and their team’s role. As our team was multi-cultural, some arguments were already expected. GROUP STAGES Our group is composed of six students which were made in the first week itself, with a few additions and subtractions in the next week. By the second week our group was formed and proceeded to a second stage known as Storming (Tuckman, 1965).
Throughout the readings and discussions, the characteristics of the initial stage of groups were explored. Please list five of these characteristics and explain how you would manage these situations. (20 points)
Working in groups is challenging at times. Other times it is very rewarding. We are so focused on life that we do not take time to reflect on things as much as we should. Being in a Groups class has opened my eyes to a whole new world. I have begun to question, explore, and even understand how things work. I even get how they work sometimes. Not only is there a process involved in making individual decisions, process is involved in group decisions as well. This paper attempts give insight into my reflection of my group decision process.
A group can be define as ‘any number of people who (1) interact with one another; (2) are psychologically aware of one another and (3) perceive themselves to be a group’ (Mullins, L, 2007, p.299). Certain task can only be performed by combined effort of a group. Organisation can use groups to carry out projects, which will help to achieve its overall aim. However, for the group to be successful they must understand what is expected of them and have the right skill to complete the task. . (Mullins, L, 2006)
I was pleased with the choice of topic and impressed by the way in which my group came to a decision. I felt comfortable and confident in my group, which was refreshing. The group members introduced themselves and so did I. I was fascinated to learn about the different group members, especially the variety within the, which was pleasant. We chose a group leader to spearhead our debate task, and I was all in favour of our choice, as I felt he (Mahlatji) would perform an excellent job.
Working together with other people for an assignment can be a challenging task in some cases but luckily, I worked well with my group members. The decisions we made were anonymous although we paced ourselves individually when it came to completing our separate parts of the essay. As a group I believe that we connected well on an interpersonal level as all four of us were able to make alterations to any problem together . Furthermore, we did not give each other a chance to get angry at one another as we knew that this would only cause conflict that would disrupt our flow as a group. There was an equal divide in the amount of work that we all did; our contributions were fair and no one was lacking behind. In addition, my group members were great at keeping each other informed if one of us were not able to attend a group meeting; emails were sent out informing us what we missed and ideas that were formulated. Everyone in my group worked according to deadlines and in synchronization with each other; we did not have to nag anyone to complete work or wait on a member to complete their task.
The aim of this piece of coursework is to work in groups to produce a
Considering that, group work is time consuming and takes longer to complete than just doing the work solely. Sometimes there can be an overpowering leader who takes over the whole assembly because they have trouble communicating with others about what they have to do. A result of that is many arguments throughout the process of getting the job finished. This way takes even longer to complete any kind of group work and is not a valuable way to get things