What is Energy Psychology?

1172 Words3 Pages

Benefits

Energy Psychology is astoundingly effective with fear, anxiety, and the emotional difficulties of everyday life, from unnecessary anger to intolerable feelings of guilt, shame, anger, jealousy, rejection, isolation, and grief. It helps change unwanted habits and behaviours and enhances the ability to love, succeed, and enjoy life.
Average life coaches also incorporate energy psychology into their repertoire. They teach it to their clients for back-home support with emotional self-management and optimizing performance. Energy Psychology also provides important self-enhancement guidelines for those not receiving counselling.
Positive clinical and experimental outcomes have shown Energy Psychology methods to help with several issues including trauma and PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), anxiety and phobias, depression, addictions, weight management, and pain. It also helps improvement in school, sports and work performance.
In his 2010 "Rapid Treatment of PTSD" article in Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, psychologist David Feinstein speculates that adding acupressure point stimulation to psychological exposure is unusually effective in its speed and power because signals are sent directly to the amygdala, which is responsible for the processing and memory of emotional reactions, resulting in rapid reduction of maladaptive fear.
It also has an improving effect on pre-test anxiety, anxiety that regards talking in front of a crowd, and also shows changes in brain activity that had to do with pain perception (decrease in pain like back pain, osteoarthritis of the hip and knee, headaches and neck pain.
Has its effectiveness been established?
EP is still seen as an experimental approach by the American ...

... middle of paper ...

...01, p. 1188) Asking the team to speculate on causes for the slow acceptance of Energy Psychology, the reasons given by these key players ranged from reliance on concepts that cannot be measured, such as “subtle energies” and “thought fields,” to the lack of empirical research, to uncertainty about the mechanisms of action, to the inherent paradigm clash between ancient healing systems and conventional psychological explanations for therapeutic change. A more fundamental credibility problem, however, was also frequently mentioned in those discussions. And that is cognitive dissonance. There is nothing in the training or background of most clinicians or researchers that prepares them to understand how tapping on the skin can help overcome severe psychological disorders, no less to account for the speed and power with which positive clinical results are being reported.

Open Document