Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Identifyingthe white substance lab report
Identifyingthe white substance lab report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Identifyingthe white substance lab report
The purpose of conducting experiment was to determine the identity of white compound. Based on the 5 gram of unknown white compound several experiment conducted including solubility test, pH test, flame test, and ion test. Several materials including chemicals used throughout experiment and will be described through paragraphs.
Solubility test was used to determine if unknown white compound was soluble in water. To conduct the solubility test, many materials were used such as flask, glass rod, scale, and chemical used was unknown white compound. First, 0.25 gram of unknown white compound carefully measured on scale. Then, the 0.25 gram of unknown white compound added to 100 mL of water and dissolved it using the glass rod. While the unknown
…show more content…
white compound was added to water, carefully watched whether the compound was dissolving or no. The same process was repeated with 0.50 gram of unknown white compound. To perform the conductivity test, three different trial were took places. First 0.10 gram of unknown white compound was measured and 20 mL of deionized water obtained in 50 mL of beaker. After obtaining conductivity apparatus, then placed it in the beaker. Using logger pro, the unknown white compound was conductive if the light turn green. Then, trials for 0.20 gram and 0.30 of unknown white compound was repeated with same procedure as 0.10 gram. The flame test was also performed in order to identify the properties of unknown white compounds. First, material were gathered: Bunsen burner, matches, and deionized water. Then the Bunsen burner was set up under hood and the nichrome wire was placed into deionized water. Also deionized water was used to stick the unknown white compound to nichrome wire. After that, the Bunsen burner was lit and held the wire over it for 5 second and recorded change in color. To determine what anions the substance contains, the following chemical test performed. First, 1 gram of unknown white substance was measured and added it to 10 mL of 50 mL of beaker. Since the formation of a precipitate indicate the presence of sulfate ion, 1 mL 6M HCl and 1 mL 0.1M BaCl2 to the solution to test if sulfate ion present. To test the presence of carbonate ion 6M HCL added to 1mL of unknown solution and record the change in carbonate ions. The presence of carbonate ions determined by the formation of carbon dioxide as bubble. The same procedure followed for halide ions. The halide ions were determined by the formation of solid , so 1mL of 6M HN03 and 1mL of 0.1M AgNO3solution to 1mL of unknown solution and record the change in the behavior of halide ions. Also to determine whether the unknown compound contain cation, flame test was used. Using clean, moistured q-tip, placed it in some of unknown compound and hold it over the hot burner flame and observe the color as it changes. This process was repeated twice using the same technique and materials. The last and final test performed was the PH test using litmus paper. Determining whether the unknown white compound was acid, base, or neutral can be very helpful because it helps narrow down the possibility of what the unknown white compound can be from the presented 15 compound. First, 0.50 gram of unknown white compound was measured then placed in 10 mL in 50 mL of beaker. Then obtained the two different color litmus paper, (blue and red). If the litmus paper turn blue to red, then it is acid and if litmus paper goes from red to blue, then the solution is base .If the paper doesn't turn either red or blue , then it is categorized into neutral which means it is not acid or base. During the experiment, carefully watched as the color of the solution might change. Result Throughout many tests that was performed, the identity of unknown white compound narrowed to KCl, KNO3, NaCl, and K2SO4 from the possible 15 compounds that presented in lab that could potential be the unknown white compound.
The technique used to narrow down the identity of unknown white compound were solubility test, pH test, flame test, and ion test. The first technique used to narrowed the properties of unknown white compound was using solubility test. To conduct solubility test, 0.25 gram of unknown white compound was dissolved in 100 mL of water. After carefully observing the change while string unknown white compound in water, the unknown white compound was soluble because it dissolved in water completely. Using bursen burner, matches and deionized water, flame test was conducted for unknown compound and it burned lilac color. Then compared the color of unknown white compound to other compound that were narrowed. The results of flame test for compounds that were narrowed down is shown in the following table. The pH test was conducted using litmus paper. 0.50 gram of unknown white compound was measured and dissolved in 10 mL of water in beaker. After dissolving, placed the litmus paper in solution and recorded the pH value of unknown compound which was neutral. Then compared the pH value of unknown white compound to compound that were narrow down. The pH result of the KCL, KNO3, NaCl, and K2SO4 is presented in the following table. The ion test was also conducted in order to make sure that the identity of unknown white compound was matched with the compound that were narrow down. After conducting the test, the result of unknown white compound which formed precipitate compared to KCl, KNO3,NaCl, and K2SO4. The results shown in the following
table.
Solid A was identified to be sodium chloride, solid B was identified to be sucrose, and Solid C was identified to be corn starch. Within the Information Chart – Mystery White Solid Lab there are results that distinguishes itself from the other 4 experimental results within each test. Such as: the high conductivity and high melting point of sodium chloride, and the iodine reaction of corn starch. Solid A is an ionic compound due to its high melting point and high electrical conductivity (7), within the Information Chart – Mystery White Solid Lab there is only one ionic compound which is sodium chloride, with the test results of Solid A, it can be concluded that is a sodium chloride. Solid B was identified as sucrose due to its low electrical
Then the reaction tube was capped but not tightly. The tube then was placed in a sand bath reflux to heat it until a brown color was formed. Then the tube was taken out of the sand bath and allowed to cool to room temperature. Then the tube was shaken until a formation of a white solid at the bottom of the tube. After formation of the white solid, diphenyl ether (2 mL) was added to the solution and heated until the white solid was completely dissolved in the solution. After heating, the tube was cooled to room temperature. Then toluene (2 mL) was added to the solution. The tube was then placed in an ice bath. Then the solution was filtered via vacuum filtration, and there was a formation of a white solid. Then the product was dried and weighed. The Final product was hexaphenylbenzene (0.094 g, 0.176 mmol,
The purpose of the Unknown White Compound Lab was to identify the unknown compound by performing several experiments. Conducting a solubility test, flame test, pH paper test, ion test, pH probe test, conductivity probe test, and synthesizing the compound will accurately identified the unknown compound. In order to narrow down the possible compounds, the solubility test was used to determine that the compound was soluble in water. Next, the flame test was used to compare the unknown compound to other known compounds such as potassium chloride, sodium chloride, and calcium carbonate. The flame test concluded that the cation in the unknown compound was potassium. Following, pH paper was used to determine the compound to be neutral and slightly
This experiment was conduct to investigate the fluorescent behaviour of Leucophor PAF and to investigate the quenching of QBS with NaCl. It was found that the Leucophor PAF indeed satisfied the characteristic to act as whitening agent. It was also found that the quenching of QBS with NaCl was a diffusion-controlled collision process.
The primary goal of this laboratory project was to identify an unknown compound and determine its chemical and physical properties. First the appearance, odor, solubility, and conductivity of the compound were observed and measured so that they could be compared to those of known compounds. Then the cation present in the compound was identified using the flame test. The identity of the anion present in the compound was deduced through a series of chemical tests (Cooper, 2009).
Hypothesis: If the mystery powder is compared with the five known compounds, the mystery powder should match the one with the same physical and chemical properties. Also their reaction with water, universal indicator, vinegar and Iodine solution should match if an accurate experiment is conducted.
3.) Divide your 30g of white substance into the 4 test tubes evenly. You should put 7.5g into each test tube along with the water.
A condenser and heat reflux was used to prevent reagents from escaping. Then the solid product was vacuum filtered. The product was recrystallized to purify it and the unknown
Determining the Identity of Unknown Substances by using the Rƒ Factor found with Chromatography Paper
When benzoic acid paired with 1.0 M NaOH, it was observed that both compounds were soluble. Upon the addition of 6.0 M HCl into this solution, benzoic acid became insoluble. Benzoic acid was also insoluble in 1.0 M HCl. Ethyl 4-aminobenzoate was found to be insoluble in 1.0 M NaOH and soluble in 1.0 M HCl. But then, after adding 6.0 M NaOH into the test tube C (mixture of ethyl 4-aminobenzoate and 1.0 M HCl), a white powdery solid (undissolved compound) was formed. These demonstrate that both the acid and base became more soluble when they were ionized and less soluble when they were
== = == Hypothesis for the experiment: After I conduct this experiment, I expect and suppose I can recognize and physical changes, identifying the difference these two kinds of changes. Also, I will be able to know some physical and chemical properties of copper (II) sulfate, water, iron, sodium carbonate, hydrochloric acid and magnesium and identify if it is a chemical change or physical change in each part of the experiment.
In my team’s investigation, we were trying to figure out four unknown powders based on the known powders we had. Our research question was, how do different chemicals change the color of the flame. First in the experiment, we prepared our lab space by making sure we had a clear countertop and had a beaker full of water ready for the hot splint to be dumped into. We all put our hair back and put our goggles on and then proceeded to turn the Bunsen burner on. After we put the Bunsen burner on, Mr. Young adjusted our flame and we sent someone to grab the first chemical to burn. We burnt chemicals on the wooden splint one after one observing the color the flame produced, recording the color, and proceeded to put the splint in the water afterwards.
By doing this experiment, I can know the physical and chemical properties of these samples. After I get my results about the physical and chemical properties of these samples, I can compare my results with the information given by the past student and identify the 5 unknown samples, finding out which sample is which substance. Hypothesis = ==
Claim: The substances in Experiment 8 A and B were both mixtures that we were able to separate by using physical methods of separation.
The chemical has colorless liquid, with characteristic odor. A harmful contamination of the air will be reached on evaporation of this substance at 20'C.