Starting and expanding families is challenging for most working people in America. Job uncertainty, financial insecurity and catering to the needs of a newborn are just a few of many challenges American families face when taking a leave of absence from work after the birth of a child. Every company should have a family policy that gives its employees the option to take paid leave if a family emergency occurs—most importantly the arrival of a newborn. Paid family leave will give working parents in America the chance to adjust to the lifestyle changes associated with having a newborn, without putting the stability of their home at risk. Pregnancies will be less stressful for mothers and fathers; businesses will increase production and the economy …show more content…
will benefit greatly from paid maternity leave. All companies should have a family policy that includes paid parental leave for those who may need it and the congress should have no problem supporting this idea. In fact, the congress should promote it. Involving both parents in the early life of an infant is essentially for the well-being of all children. When a father and Mother can care for their newborn together, it creates a safer environment for the baby and the parents can worry less. Infant mortality rates and premature births are substantially lower for families who receive paid time off to cater to the needs a newborn. Families who can care for their newborns themselves, instead of immediately returning to work and hiring a babysitter to watch their babies after the delivery can provide their full, undivided attention to their newborn, decreasingly the likelihood of infant death, sickness, or injury, within the homes of working families. There are several studies with spellbinding data that supports the idea that providing paid parental leave is beneficial for the workers and the well-being of their families. The Sage study is one of many studies conducted that point out the benefits of paid-leave. It will have a positive and lasting effect on the lives of children and their parents. According to Susan J. Doulgas, “The Sage study provides compelling data to support the need not only for paid family leave, but also for high- quality early childhood education for all kids” (Douglas Par. 3) The Sage Study suggests that American children are less advanced than those in other countries: socially, academically and developmentally. Working parents are forced to choose between working or being with their babies.
With no pay and the risk of losing their jobs--if additional time is requested--parents return to work in as little as two weeks after the birth of a child. This results in the absence of one or both parents during the most crucial part of a child’s life—the first year of life. Ultimately, it is the children who will suffer. The events that take place in the early years of a child life, as well as the people that surround, will influence who they become. Children need love and guidance from their parents. Babies can learn so much, parents have the time to teach them and watch them grow. It is their duty as well as their rights as parents to enjoy the first moments of life with their children. Susan J. Douglas says, “The first five years of life are so crucial to cognitive and emotional development” (Douglas Par 8). Parents often send their babies to daycare at too young of an age because they are expected to return to work and have no other choice. Others quit their job because they do not want their babies to go to daycare. This creates a financial strain on families and has lasting effects on the newborn and other young children in the home. Sharon Lerner says, “Paid parental leave frees mothers and fathers from choosing between their careers and time with their infants” (Lerner 20). Paid family leave alleviates a great deal of stress for parents who are expecting. It makes starting a family less frightening because families have enough money and time to adjust with their new lives before returning to work. This makes workers less likely to call out of upon returning and more likely to be focused on the
job. The misconception that paid family leave will be too expensive for companies is why most business owners are not in favor it, but it is just that—a misconception. It imposes little to no costs on companies and increases worker retention. It isn’t often that employees will need to take a paid leave of absence for a family emergency. Companies who have already started providing their employees with paid leave have not seen any significant costs associated with it. In fact, most companies have seen an increase in production. Lerner says, “Despite dire warnings from business interests, most employers in New Jersey and California (where programs have been in effect long enough to be studied) haven’t found that paid leave has hurt productivity, profitability or turnover.” (Lerner 22). Employees who have paid leave after childbirth are more likely to return to work within a reasonable amount of time, fully focused and ready to work. They were also much less likely to call out because of childcare issues. Almost every other developed nation, besides America has paid leave for working families. Nations who value working families have better economies. Kosik says, “A lack of paid leave makes the U.S. a global outlier-every other industrialized nation affords new parents paid time off.” Many other countries have seen the benefits of companies giving their employees paid time off. It stimulates the economy, by increasing production and growth within companies. Paid parental leave for men and women is narrowing the gap in gender equality, mainly because women who receive paid leave are much more likely to return to work and less likely to rely on government assistance and men are more likely to take some time off to help the mother cater to the needs of the baby. Jessica Kosik says, “E- sector workers have paid family leave through their employer. In its absence, many parents dip into their savings or even turn to crowdfunding to take time off for a new baby” (Par 9). When families don’t have to use saved money to pay for baby expenses and bills during a leave of absence from work, they are less likely to go in debt. If every company has a family policy that gives its employees the option of taking paid time off after childbirth, the quality of life for infants and children, because parents will be able to take care of their homes and give their children the attention, love and guidance that is needed during the first few months of life. In turn, babies will grow to be smarter, more sociable people, with a more positive outlook on life. When parents return to work after taking a leave of absence, they will be completely ready to work. Worker production and worker retention will increase and turnover will decrease for all companies. Men and women who can properly balance family life and work are more productive citizens and help stimulate the economy by working more and creating less debt America.
The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave and job protection for childbirth, adoption or foster care; to care for a seriously ill child, spouse, or parent; or for an employee’s own serious illness (Cañas & Sondak, 2011). It also requires that their group health benefits remain intact during the unpaid leave of absence. The employee must have worked for the employer for at least a year and must have earned 1,250 hours of service during the previous 12 months ((Cañas & Sondak, 2011, pg. 70).
The balancing act of family and work can be very difficult at times. At some point in everyone’s life, he or she will need to take time off of work to deal with family matters. The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) of 1993 was created to help employees find a balance between the challenging demands of work and home. This Act allows eligible workers that require time off for personal reasons or family emergencies up to twelve weeks of unpaid leave.
In response to the increasing need for employees to balance the demands of the workplace with the needs of families, Congress passed the Family and Medical Leave Act. Without a policy like FMLA in place, many employees often would have had to choose between “the job they need and the family they love” (Hayes). The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 is the first national law created to help Americans balance the demands of the workplace with the needs of the family. It successfully helps bridge the gap between family and work and secures the right for both men and women to get unpaid leave and assistance when dealing with family related circumstances.
This policy allows working couples to choose how they balance their work and parenting commitment to their new baby. The first two weeks are reserved for the mother but the remaining fifty weeks can be shared between both parents (Glegg, Swinson, 2013).This will definitely give chance to fathers to bond with their infants on an equal footing with the mother. Sarkadi, et al (2007) also suggests that policies should be made that fathers of young children may choose to do part time jobs so they can have time with their
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) was passed in 1993 and allows employees to take unpaid leave for up to 12 workweeks in any 12 month period because of any of the following reasons: the birth or adoption of a child, for the care of a family member with a serious health condition, or because the employee’s own serious health conditions makes the employee unable to perform the functions of her or her job. This paper will discuss the advantages and disadvantages to both the employer and the employee concerning this act. The current use of FMLA and management concerns over the FMLA will also be discussed.
Family leave has many benefits to children and the family. Rossin (2011) states, “[family] leave may affect the amount of time a child spends with his mother rather than in non-maternal care. [family] leave will also affect the quality of time the child spends with the mother, depending on changes to her stress level and her satisfaction with the trajectory of her career. The quantity and quality of time a mother spends with her child in his first year of life matter for the child's well-being”
While the 1993 Family and Medical Leave Act theoretically guarantees all workers up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave to care for a new child or sick family member, it applies only to businesses with more than 50 employees, only covers workers that have been with their employer for at least one year, and doesn’t extend to part-time workers. These exemptions are significant; they ensure that just over half of American workers and less than a fifth of all new mothers are actually covered by FMLA. And they disproportionately affect low-income workers, who are more likely to work for small businesses, change employers frequently, and piece together multiple part-time
The effects on individuals has thus far revealed only part of the whole picture. When focus is shifted to workers with family situations, reports are revealing that time constraints are also connected to the shared working time between parents in households, with dual-earner based households and single parents meeting intensified challenges. Among these parents, women are even today continuing to take on the biggest share of family based responsibility and caretaking. This is thus making women workers, or single fathers, feel even more pressure than their workforce counterparts who have no children. The separation between workers who have no children and mothers or fathers with caretaking responsibilities has led to yet another growing divide that demands a change in policy that will address the specific conditions of workers and their families.
In today’s economy one’s livelihood is extremely important. Employers depend on their employees to show up for work on time, and give 100% effort to the tasks at hand. Typically when the employer is aware that the employee is a single mother, there is a certain amount of tolerance when she calls in to miss a day of work due to an emergency with her child(ren). However, the tolerance for missed days of work for the single father is not present, an...
In a society with the muajority of mothers joining or returning to the workforce, there is a growing body of research documenting the demands placed on these women and what can be done to help their transition into this new role. According to the United States’ Department of Labor, in the year 2012, 70.5% of mothers with children under the age of 18 were a part of the workforce; of these women 73.7% were employed full-time, working over 35 hours a week, and 26.3% were employed part-time, working less than 35 hours a week (United States Department of Labor, 2012). Given this information, it is becoming more important to further research how this new role as an employee affects the role of parenting and what can be done to help this transition. The intent of this paper is to compare the experiences of a working mother to the current research on the topic of working mothers. Moreover, this paper addresses the demands placed on working mothers as well as the factors that ameliorate their transition into this new role.
Millions of people each year have reasons to visit a medical facility; however, time without pay from work can be detrimental to the family’s income. Women missing work or not being promoted because of pregnancy, illness, or illness of a family member is a factor that is being discussed in the workforce. The fact that women are often paid less than men causes them not to use their unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act(FMLA) simply because they cannot afford the loss in pay. Life events such as having a baby or taking care of a ill family member have prompt some states such as California, New Jersey and soon to add Washington to recognize the importance to make policies that ensure paid family leave is available to all persons in the workforce regardless of work status and gender. This undertaking by theses state can be the beginning to other states and employer to provide this opportunity to be paid while out of work to their
Thank you for this week’s post. I really enjoyed reading the information that you provided. I agree with you that although the Family and Medical Leave Act serves the intention for eligible parents to be able to spend 12 weeks to care for their newly born or newly adopted child without losing their jobs, the unpaid part of the policy creates issues of disparities between advantaged and disadvantaged parents, parents don't take the full 12 weeks of maternity leaves, and the fact that the shorter maternity leave is related to a higher depression rate which may eventually lead to some negative impacts on the infants. I think this makes sense because if a parent wants to support their new child financially, she/he would choose to return to work
The stress that also comes with a loss of income can break up couples or families because the father is the sole provider. This stress can be avoided if companies provide paid maternity leave. When companies provide paid maternity leave, it actually encourages a more loyal in employee. Google implemented paid maternity leave and saw positive results. “When Google expanded its maternity leave program, the company found that women who took the new leave were "more productive and happier" when they came back to work.
Well that is just not true,” says Senator Kirsten Gillibrand in a video interview on paid maternity leave (Maternity). In most families, both parents have to work to provide for the family in today’s economy. When someone has a child, they should not have to worry about losing their job, or having to return to work before
Many other developed countries recognize that maternal employment plays important role in defining the direction of changes in society. In those countries, many different public policies are placed to insure support for working mothers. However, U.S. is way behind on implementing those types of policies. In fact, U.S. is the only developed country that does not...