Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Principles of supervision
Principles of supervision
A Theory Of Supervision
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Principles of supervision
Supervisors have a tendency to have too much pride in their respective work centers. The amount of experience he or she may have gives one a sense of entitlement, which can hurt when becoming an efficient leader in today’s Air Force. One of the most important roles or concepts as a leader is from the Four I’s, Intellectual Stimulation (Thinking). In Structural Maintenance, no aircraft repair or additional duty is the same and it takes “thinking outside of the box” to achieve the end goal. Using this concept is important because it gives our subordinates a chance to open their minds so that they may grow on their own experiences and become the leaders of tomorrow. It teaches them that “the way it always has been done” is not the final answer. Simply asking someone “What do you think?” can …show more content…
The consequences of not using Intellectual Stimulation can hurt a work center by putting a strangle hold on the creative process. Not allowing a young airmen a chance to speak their minds or to give incite on a certain challenge will hamper the development process, establishing an unhealthy environment. Subordinates will start to believe their supervisors are not approachable, opening doors for more mistakes in the work place and slowing down their chance to become the leaders we need for the future. According to our required reading for Module 3 in Chapter 7, Page 213, “This is the degree a leader values their subordinates’ rationality and intellect, seeking different perspectives and considering opposing points of view.” As a supervisor, I will apply the concept with this definition in mind. Intellectual Stimulation is a great way for a leader to know what type of airmen he or she has and to build on their strengths and weaknesses. In the future, whatever challenge may arise, I will always ask my subordinates what they think of the situation and how they would tackle the challenge. I will start group discussions on ideas to break up the “ism” that surrounds
Too many instances of leaders just agreeing with staff recommendations and taking a far too conservative approach in their decision making has affected many units because many times decisions and actions are approached way too late. This article shows that objectively assess the information presented and making an effective decision within a reasonable timeframe would increase the effectiveness of each decision.
The bystander effect refers to the tendency for an observer of an emergency to withhold aid if the:
They also relatably talk of the way that they affect students in their higher education. In Gerald Graff’s essay about hidden intellectualism it is implied that we all have intellect within us. It just may be show in different ways among different people. He offers the example that a love for learning about anything can later be converted into a love for learning about academic subjects. Where in the second essay we talk more about people who have feelings of anti-intellectualism which we learn is a negative feeling towards intellect or learning itself. You could say that those who feel anti-intellectualism tend to have dwindling desires to continue in school and gaining this so called intellect, leading them to complacency in their education. Whereas those who have increased desire to further their intellects will tend to stay on a path of fulfillment and
In The article “Brainology” “Carol S Dweck, a professor of psychology at Stanford University, differentiates between having a fixed and growth mindset in addition how these mindsets have a deep effect on a student’s desire to learn. Individuals who have a fixed mindset believe they are smart without putting in effort and are afraid of obstacles, lack motivation, and their focus is to appear smart.. In contrast, students with a growth mindset learn by facing obstacles and are motivated to learn. Dwecks argues that students should develop a growth mindset.
Sergeants of Marines are considered the backbone of the Corps, but a steady rise of fearful NCO’s, is now a common trend. Not ones that fear the terrors of war, violence, or bloodshed, but Marines that fear the pen on a piece of paper, both in combat as well as in Garrison. These are Sergeants that wait for the answer and accept what their being told without debate as opposed to taking split second moves that could be the lifesaving moments needed for their team in a real world scenario. The first step to correcting this problem is at the NCO level. Decisiveness is a leadership trait that is detrimental to the noncommissioned officers reputation within the Marine Corps. By encouraging outside the box thinking and making decisions with full confidence, Marines gain what is needed to ultimately decide when it matters, and most importantly influence junior marines by reinforcing this leadership trait.
...n was yet another display of the most beneficial style of leadership. Putting together teams, holding regular meetings in locations that were conducive to deep thinking, allowing debates, and discussions to take place, not choosing sides and arriving at a consensus is the very core of team building and fostering inclusive environments. Doing it all while displaying sound ethical principles routed in being a southern Baptist Minister enabled Dr. King to achieve huge successes as the primary leader of the Civil Rights Movement. Taking notes from one of the great leaders of yesteryear can and does help senior non-commissioned officers get better. Being an effective motivating speaker, putting the organization before self, team building, and having appropriate ethical principles to back it all up go hand in hand with leading Airman in today’s United States Air Force.
These questions are then used as the driving force for generating and implementing changes. To think through or rethink anything, individuals within an organization must ask questions that stimulate deeper levels of thought. Questions define tasks, express problems and identify issues. While answers on the other hand, often signal a full stop in thought. Only when answers generate further questions does thought continue to add value in terms of personal as well as organizational growth and change.
Many individuals in our military today have this notion that just because they earned their “stripes” that they automatically deserve respect, and that their subordinates should and will listen to them strictly because of what is on their chest. A true leader not only leads, develops, and mentors, but they embody and apply those leader competencies in their everyday life both on and off duty. Being a leader doesn’t mean you always have to be the mean guy. It means that you can successfully provide purpose, direction and motivation to make your Soldiers want to work for you to accomplish the mission. In this paper, I will discuss and give examples about the difference between Competent Leadership
Leaders must think to survive in every form of physical and mental conflict. Army leaders are responsible to solve problems, from “the mundane to the magnificent’ , with an expectation of complete success in determining the best possible decision to a given problem. Utilizing cognitive training tools to expand a stagnate mind (Drs. Paul and Elder’s Eight Elements of Thought) and following proven models of success (Army Problem Solving Process) facilitate a positive outcome for Army officers when they are making difficult decisions. Drs. Paul and Elder developed eight elements of thought that assist Army officers and provide additional definitions to the thought categories in the seven steps of the Army Problem Solving Process.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
The old paradigm of students as empty vessels waiting to be filled with knowledge has given way to the constructivist belief that students continuously build understandings based on their prior experiences and information. The idea of a fixed intelligence has given way to a more flexible perception of gradual intellectual development dependent on external stimulation (6)
Intellectual stimulation in a brief definition is the leader giving the followers opportunity to look at the problems from many different angles. Mark Zuckerberg not just upraises the priority of sharing a vision of the company to his employee, but he also upraises the creativity of the employee when work for him. Especially it is a social media website, where he need people with creativity and innovative work for him to create a website that will attract more people. In an article from Entrepreneur about working for Facebook, the author has mentioned a quote from Mark that show how his feature the creativity in his company: “[Employees] need the ability to fully exercise all their creativity and all their capacity, or else they’re not going to be having the biggest impact that they can have on the world, and they’re going to want to go do something else” (Weiss). In addition to that, Mark Zuckerberg also focuses on approaching the problem from different perspectives. Especially when working with connecting people from all over the world, the diversity of thinking and perspective on one problem is very important. On Facebook career website, Mark Zuckerberg has mentioned on how he values the diversity at his company. Quote from his website: “We value the impact of every individual. We’re creating a workplace where everyone can celebrate and share their different perspectives”. As a company focusing
As General Dempsey states in his White Paper, “Leader development is an investment required to maintain the Army as a profession and is a key source of combat power. Leadership entails the repetitive exercise of discretionary judgments, all highly moral in nature, and represents the core function of the Army professional’s military art, whether leading a patrol in combat or making a major policy or budget decision in the Pentagon.”
It is simple but it left me with questions and the want to ask, “why?” and I asked a lot. At a later time in my career I noticed another type of leadership style, and the question was, “What do you guys think?” and that was asked quite often. This style had about the same success rate when completing a task than my first encounter, but why?
Elements of thought are precepts that state that all reasoning has a purpose, is an attempt to figure something out, is based on assumptions, is done from some point of view, is based on data and evidence, is expressed through concepts and ideas, contains inferences or interpretations by which we draw conclusions, and leads somewhere or has implications or consequences. The universal intellectual standards that must be applied to these elements are; accuracy, precision, clarity, depth, relevance, significance, logic, fairness, sufficiency, and breadth. Successfully applying these standards to the elements of thought result in the eventual development of intellectual traits. These traits are; intellectual humility, intellectual courage, intellectual empathy, intellectual autonomy, intellectual integrity, intellectual perseverance, confidence in reason, and fair-mindedness. The use of these intellectual traits will produce a critical thinker who can raise vital questions and problems with clarity and precision. They will allow a critical thinker to gather and assess relevant information, and come to well-reasoned conclusions and solutions. The ultimate goal of using this framework is to produce a thinker who communicates effectively while finding solutions to complex problems (Paul & Elder, 2006).