Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal leadership and leadership styles
Brief Essay on Leadership Styles
Brief Essay on Leadership Styles
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal leadership and leadership styles
Abstract
The subject of this paper concerns the effects of poor leadership in business management. Research methods included Leadership Excellence, Corporate Governance, Leadership Styles, Journal of Knowledge Management, Oxford Dictionary Online, Information & Management, OhioLink sources. Emphasis will relate to Steven Berglas (2009) on victims of success. Findings are in agreement with Patricia Hind, Andrew Wilson, and Gilbert Lenssen (2009) Developing leaders for sustainable business; and Victor Newman & Kazem Chaharbaghi (2000) The study and practice of leadership, and Norma Sutcliffe (1999) Leadership behavior and business process reengineering (BPR) outcomes: An empirical analysis of 30 BPR projects. It may be concluded that Leadership Styles (1997) and Oxford Dictionary Online (2010) gave valuable insight on which temperament matches leadership styles.
The Effects of Poor Leadership in Business Management
Autocrat, Benevolent Autocrat, Consultative, Participative, Consensus and Laissez-Faire are types of leadership styles. Individuals’ personalities have an influence on which leadership style he or she claims. It is common knowledge to professional leaders that autocrat style leaders are directive and demand instant action from team members without explanation where as benevolent autocrat leaders declare with explanation (Leadership Styles, 1997, p.1 & Sutcliffe, 1999, p.276). Interactive leadership styles are consultative and participative. Consultative gets opinions before deciding on the plan and participative leaders consider team members’ view points before making final decisions (Leadership Styles, 1997, p.1 & Sutcliffe, 1999, p.276). Consensus and Laissez-Faire leadership roles...
... middle of paper ...
...
References
Berglas, S. (2009). Victims of Success Avoid self-destructive action. Leadership Excellence.
Retrieved from OhioLINK
Hind, P., Wilson, A., & Lenssen, G. (2009). Developing leaders for sustainable business.
Corporate Governance, 9, 7-20. Retrieved from OhioLINK
Leardership Styles (1997). Retrieved from
http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~gerard/MENG/ME96/Documents/Styles/
Newman, V., & Chaharvaghi, K. (2000). The study and practice of leadership. Journal of
Knowledge Management, 4, 64-73. Retrieved from OhioLINK
Oxford Dictionary Online (2010). Retrieved from www.askoxford.com/dictionaries
Sutcliffe, N. (1999). Leadership behavior and business process reengineering (BPR) outcomes:
An empirical analysis of 30 BPR projects. Information & Management, 36, 273-286.
Retrieved from OhioLINK
When I was on a post surgical floor I witnessed a scenario where leadership was ineffective. It involved an RN and the nurse manager for the floor who was responsible for assigning the patients to nurses. The nurse manager on this floor usually only had one or two patients and spent most of their time dealing with any problems that arose on the floor. One RN was very upset with her patient load and said it was unfair and wanted to have at least one less patient as she said all 5 of her patients were going to be a lot of work. The nurse manager dismissed the RN and said there were care aides on floor to help so she would be fine and told her to get to work. The leadership issues here were a lack of communication
In this section of the paper, I will discuss current relevant literary articles that are related to ineffective leader skills, effective leadership skills, and inadequate communication skills. These scholarly references will show how others are dealing with the issues of ineffective leadership skill. It will also illustrate what can be done to improve poor leadership behavior. By reviewing these references, I will be able to help my organization become more successful.
They further stated that most leadership forms a new paradigm for understanding both the lower and higher order effects of leadership style. The style of leadership which is adopted by a leader is influenced by the leader’s background, personal experience, religion, political affiliation, ideology, inclination, culture and even orientation without necessarily being based on the dynamics of the situation. The major leadership constructs consist of transformational leadership, transactional leadership, and lazzirfair leadership others that are going are common are democratic and autocratic types of
STYLES OF LEADERSHIP An autocratic leadership style is one where the manager sets objectives, allocates tasks, and insists on obedience. Therefore the group becomes dependent on him or her. The result of this style is the members of the group are often dissatisfied with the leader. This results in little cohesion, the need for high levels of supervision, and poor levels of motivation amongst employees. A democratic leadership style encourages participation in decision making.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
Leaders who employ an autocratic style use direct actions to dictate the rules, regulations, events, and culture (Nelson & Quick, 2011). In short, this type of leader makes all the strategic decisions for the followers (Gill, 2014). Followers have little power to stray from the leader’s guidelines (Nelson & Quick, 2011). Autocratic leadership is stereotypically a masculine style of governance (Arnold & Loughlin, 2013).
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
Suddenly, some companies become extremely successful, while rest of them unfortunately remains a failure. There can be off-course a lot of reasons for this failure but one of the main reasons is lack of leadership qualities. There are many s...
Organizations have leaders who are effective and ineffective. Many of us want to be leaders but, do we have what it takes to be effective or are we going to be ineffective. Leaders are people who build their organization and employees up. Ineffective leaders are those who only care about getting a check. This paper will discuss effective and ineffective leaders. The effective and ineffective leaders I have had the pleasure to work with.
This paper has summarized some prominent studies about leadership styles. Before understanding the styles which I may choose to practice, extensive studies on various leadership theories and approaches have been carried out. After conducting this research paper, I believe that there is no one-size-fits-all style for leadership. Lewin’s Model and Belbin’s Team Role Model have extended my knowledge and they have encouraged me to learn to assume different roles or styles in different possible situations. Therefore, I can get acquainted more easily to carrying out teamwork in my future job.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.
Chan, K. W. & Maubourgne, R. A. 1992, Parables of leadership, Harvard Business Review, July-August.
There are many examples of poor leadership behavior in today’s workplace. Inadequate leadership can be detrimental not only to a team within an organization, but also to the entire organization itself. I believe it is vital for upper management to ensure that their leaders are properly trained and aware of how to handle certain situations and employees. When a leader’s weaknesses are overlooked, large problems occur.
There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)
Leader should have the shared responsibility and collaborative quality. For example, instead of making the strategy alone, he will gather the idea of all brilliant workers to increase the productivity of the organisation.