Compare And Contrast Autocratic And Participative Leadership

1284 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Leadership styles

Autocratic and Participative Leadership – A Comparison
Leadership is the ability to influence followers to achieve group goals (Tost, Gino, & Larrick, 2013). The autocratic and participative leadership styles will both achieve the outcome, but the techniques are different. Autocratic leaders use a hands-on approach while participative leaders use a political tactic. Despite the method, a conflict will arise. The leader’s actions will determine if there are a winner and loser or if the parties will compromise.
Autocratic Leadership Leaders who employ an autocratic style use direct actions to dictate the rules, regulations, events, and culture (Nelson & Quick, 2011). In short, this type of leader makes all the strategic decisions for the followers (Gill, 2014). Followers have little power to stray from the leader’s guidelines (Nelson & Quick, 2011). Autocratic leadership is stereotypically a masculine style of governance (Arnold & Loughlin, 2013). Donald Trump, Chairman and President of The Trump Organization (http://www.trump.com/biography/), is an example of an autocratic leader. In 2006, Trump was …show more content…

If the leader uses this approach to conflict resolution, then it will lead to a competitive strategy and there will be a winner and loser (Nelson & Quick, 2011). On the other hand, organizations with participative leaders are familiar with group discussions and teamwork. Hence, both leadership styles (autocratic and participative) should get to know the people and the root of the problem before making a verdict on the situation (Cialdini & Martin, 2012). After the leader hears both sides, they should bring the parties together to discuss and negotiate the best course of action, therefore, using a cooperative strategy to produce three winners (Nelson & Quick,

Show More
Related

  • Leadership Lessons From Beowulf and Oedipus

    1488 Words  | 3 Pages

    Leadership can be defined as the ability of a superior to influence the behavior of a minor or group and persuade them to follow a particular course of action. A leader sets a course of action and ensures that everyone follows the action. Leading can apply to leading oneself, other individuals, groups, organizations and societies. The nature of how leading is done depends on the framework of the situation, one's point of view, and on the nature and needs of those involved. While leadership is learned, the skills and knowledge processed by the leader are influenced by their traits, such as beliefs, values, ethics, and most importantly character.

    Read More

  • Personality Traits And Leadership Styles Of Great Leaders

    731 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...esearch of the situation. This leadership style is beneficial in situations where a quick decision is necessary. The downside to this type of leadership is people who tend to use an autocratic leadership style are seen as controlling and dictatorial. This type of behavior can lead to resentment with the other group members.

    Read More

  • Leadership and Management

    1859 Words  | 4 Pages

    If the inputs are seen as used, employees are likely to feel as though they had a positive impact; if the inputs are consistently rejected, employees are likely to feel that their time has been wasted. Participative leaders clearly decentralize authority. Participative decisions are not unilateral, as with the autocrat, because they use

    Read More

  • What Is Leadership Style

    794 Words  | 2 Pages

    Participative (Democratic) leadership is, as its name implies, a participation of the group. The participants all collaborate in the decisions the group must make. “Researchers have found that this learning style is usually one of the most effective and lead to higher productivity, better contributions from the group members, and increased moral.”

    Read More

  • Leadership Style Essay

    1893 Words  | 4 Pages

    In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Autocratic And Transformational Leadership Theories

    1227 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).

    Read More

  • Social Work Group Analysis

    1019 Words  | 3 Pages

    Particularly, two members within my group began to emerge as leaders due to their knowledge, skills, as well as experience working with our chosen population. Although I always view them as ‘experts’ in this topic, our group became less focused on our goals and more concerned about the ‘power struggle’ between our two leaders, before we could reach any consensus. Essentially, our group had two authoritarians butting heads and trying to take lead throughout the beginning of the group process. Thus, the other members or ‘followers’ contribution, like mine, seem to not matter unless they adhered to either leaders’ opinions without question. According to Stringer (2014), “Leadership… Is defined according to its function of facilitating organizational and operational processes, rather than defining and controlling them” (p. 31). The researcher further states that active participation is the key to encourage and motivate group members to invest their time and energy to shape the quality of the group's production. Therefore, our group needed to find ways for all members to have a chance to participate fully and apply their individual strengths, in order to enhance our group’s

    Read More

  • Vroom Jago Leadership Model

    819 Words  | 2 Pages

    Autocratic II (A2). The leader takes a decision based on the information that is requested from the team members. This differs from the above type of leadership in the only aspect that the leader doesn’t have all the necessary information to arrive at a decision and requests the same from the team members.

    Read More

  • Essay On Personal Style Of Leadership

    1511 Words  | 4 Pages

    Halal and Brown (1981) write that participative management may not only increase productivity and decrease operating costs associated with low morale, it may enhance flexibility through lowering the decision making process to the operational level. This is because the operational level is where the actual work is completed. The manager or supervisor does not always have the best picture of how a process is completed, and they can get lost in the details. The operational level knows the details, thus to work together collaboratively is key. According to Mooney (n.d.) the participative leader empowers others. This is someone who is willing to share the spotlight by giving their employees the opportunity to make major decisions. They are also there to support these workers when they make mistakes and need help in solving problems. This leader invests much of their own success by placing it in the hands of those they

    Read More

  • Autocratic Leadership Case Study

    698 Words  | 2 Pages

    The leadership style that was possessed here was autocratic leadership. Autocratic leadership involves the leader making decisions and using power to control the situation and others Kelly, P.,

    Read More

  • Autocratic Leadership: A Case Study

    310 Words  | 1 Pages

    Autocratic leaders have been described as controlling, power-orientated and closed-minded (Bass 2008). They stress obedience, loyalty and strict adherence to the rules (Bass 2008). Autocratic leaders may be disliked by their team, but this may evolve into appreciation and fondness once the positive results of their leadership become evident (Bass 2008). Although staffmay dislike autocratic leaders, they often work well under them (Bass 2008). Schoel et al (2011) found that well-liked leaders might be perceived as ineffective while disliked leaders might be perceived as

    Read More

  • The Different Styles of Management

    996 Words  | 2 Pages

    An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.

    Read More

  • Four Leadership Style Essay

    1244 Words  | 3 Pages

    Autocratic leaders also known as authoritarian leaders are leaders that have absolute authority over subordinates, are in control of the situation they are in, dictate and enforce orders, rarely consult with or ask opinions of others, are highly task driven, and the emotional needs of people are a low priority. The advantage of an Autocratic leader is they typically achieve results quickly; they would make a great leader during the time of crisis or when a project

    Read More

  • The Importance Of Being A Participative Leader

    1468 Words  | 3 Pages

    Participative leaders or better known as democratic leaders include team members and others, but making the final decision is up to the participative leader. Participative leaders build confidence and knowledge within team members because their inputs matter within decision making. It helps team members think their opinions help with decisions. If there is change that needs to be implemented a participative leader helps team members understand the change in positive way. I would definitely consider myself a participative leader because I love gathering as many opinions from people just in case I don’t see the situation from another point. It helps me put everything in a good perspective.

    Read More

  • My Leadership Style Essay

    1115 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are a few different types of well known leadership styles, authoritarian, delegative, and democratic. To assess my leadership style I used two online tests to help me determine my style. I felt the results were accurate and I fall into a democratic style/participative style. If I am leading I prefer to include the group and get their feedback on solving issues. However, I still make the final decision after listening to the thoughts of the group on a particular topic. This is considered to be a positive style of leadership that is inspiring to the group involved. The leaders decision making tends to be more accurate due to the input of other experts. (Cite)

    Read More

More about Compare And Contrast Autocratic And Participative Leadership

Open Document