Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tattoos in the workplace laws
Tattoos in the workplace why they should be accepted
Tattoos and Piercings in the workplace, essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tattoos in the workplace laws
After reading and evaluating the article, Tattoos and Piercings in the Workplace by Erika Icon I am able to stand on my view on the frequently asked question, should tattoos and piercings be covered up in the workplace? Yes, they should be covered. Although I am all for “self expression” I believe the workers of a company represent the overall appeal of the business and unless they are a tattoo company, showing your neck tattoo may give off the wrong impression to valued customers. The current mainstream culture and younger generation see no problem with the art of tattoos, but this does not include older men and women. Some people have a negative connotation towards tattoos and piercings and may affect their support of a business. It is up to the workplace to consider this when hiring. If I were an owner of a company visible tattoos would be a huge downside when looking for possible employees. I would have to consider if their experience and other resume attributions made up for their body art. Overall, at the end of the day I would rather choose a worker with no tattoos than one with them …show more content…
Some people have consulted laser tattoo removal. This profession of laser tattoo removal found in dermatologist and cosmetic surgery facilities has grown in popularity over the years with the increase of tattoos. On the flip side, careers in the art field have no issues with hiring tatted workers. The author added their own excerpt at the end of the article expressing her opinion on the whole debate. It gave an interesting perspective from a person with actual tattoos in the work force. Despite having the opportunity to “be herself” she still abided by the rules. I think this was very professional and considerate. At the end of the day you are the one who needs the job and it is best to follow the rules to avoid any dilemmas that may cost you your
In Kosut’s article “The Artification of Tattoo: Transformations within a Cultural Field”, the author takes a look at how tattoos are a form of art and should be seen this way. It also indicates how tattoo artists have to have a technical skill in order to do this job and should be seen as actual artists and not overlooked. In addition to having steady hands like a surgeon, tattoo artists create original work for their clients. If tattoo artists and their work were seen as a legitimate career, it would be even more likely that tattoos would be accepted in society.
In “Judging by the Cover” author Bonnie Gainley argues that employers have the right to discriminate against job applicants who have chosen to decorate their bodies in ways that, in the employers’ estimation, may detract from the applicants’ job performance. She supports this claim by explaining two major points: First, employers have an obligation to hire workers who will favorably “represent the business to its customers” (667), and second, job applicants with potentially offensive decorations, such as tattoos and piercings, have freely chosen to place them on their bodies, so the applicants must take responsibility for the consequences.
...llious and dangerous. One should be delighted to have the freedom to dress and decorate themselves as they wish. Having a tattoo in today’s world still may not be viewed as professional, but tattoos are definitely no longer, nor should they ever be, viewed as unprofessional.
Tattoos have been around for quite some time now, and they have always been a symbol of belonging, cultural expression or for religion. These days, individuals choose to tattoo themselves because it is part of their lifestyle or personal image. While continuing to grow in popularity and becoming a lifestyle, people are facing issues with having visible tattoos in the workforce. Although it is a form of free expression, employers have a right to enforce certain rules about tattoos in their company because they have a public image to uphold. How you present yourself to the public is solely important, which is why tattoos should not be allowed to be seen in the workplace, since it may appear offensive or unconservative.
A controversial topic today is whether or not body piercings and tattoos should be accepted by professionals working in health care. Currently, tattoos and piercings are allowed in health care as long as they are not visible. According to one of the studies, “Body piercing is defined as a piercing of the body anywhere other than the earlobes” (Westerfield). Therefore, the only visible piercings allowed are small studs in the lobes of the ears for females. The reason body piercings and tattoos are not suggested in health care is that they keep someone from looking professional as well as making them look intimidating. Not everyone sees them that way. The opposing side is that they do not affect
Just because someone has most of their body covered in tattoos and many piercings, that does not mean that they are not a wonderful person and it is not great at their job. On a personal account, I have met many great people covered in wonderful tattoos and are the nicest people in the world. But, I can understand why jobs will look at a person, and understand why they will not hire them for a job based on body modifications and tattoos that they have. Yes, when getting a job, they must look presentable and when working you can cover the tattoos with shirts and makeup. You should still be able to get the job based on how you work, if you are good for that job, not on how you look.
This is because our society has certain standards, and ideas of what a professional should look like, so many employers will force a person to cover their tattoos or take out certain piercings that do not fit society’s professional norms. By covering up ones tattoos, and still producing a great work ethic at the job shows that tattoos do not affect the person, or personality. So, showing a tattoo should not affect what the employer thinks of a present, or future employee. Someone that covers their tattoos is more likely to get a job rather than someone that freely exposes them. Our society has many brilliant minds that are capable of doing great things if the business world would lift the strict stereotype of what a professional should look like. (Williams, Thomas, Christensen
What impression would the employer get if someone came in for an interview with piercings and tattoos? The employer would think that this person really doesn't want the job because he/she doesn't care about their appearance. Unfortunately, people are very stereotypical and do judge a book by its cover. The business world is very conservative, and that's how you should look. It would be extremely uncommon to see people with tattoos all over and piercings everywhere.
The world has changed tremendously throughout the years. Through the personal and cultural expression of tattooing oneself most wonder why people today get tattoos. Furthermore, those who think tattoos are just for looks will have to realize that tattoos are a part of ones life. Therefore one might say, “ Tattooing is used in a way to mark important events or people in their lives in a permanent way.”(Milcetich) people today should look in the meaning and value of a tattoo “As a statement carved in ones body” (Milcetich). Along with that meaning in ones body, people’s attitudes towards tattoos have begun to change what one thinks about tattoos.
Tattooing has increased widespread from all ages, careers, and social classes (Westerfield, Stafford, Speroni, & Daniel, 2012). Tattoos’ usual meaning is “to stain the skin with colorings” (Goldstein, 2007). With the growing the populations, who have tattoos and/or body piercings in the work environment, there is requiring decision about what policies to establish forward associates a professional atmosphere. Thus, there assesses patients’ perceptions of health care workers with tattoos and/or body piercing (Westerfield, Stafford, Speroni, & Daniel, 2012).
Furthermore, I believe that an individual may have a tattoo, no matter what field of work they are doing and this is because that
People with tattoos and piercings are classified as uneducated, less qualified, lazy, irresponsible, and even defined as delinquents. This is simply prejudice and biased. There are so many employees today, including doctors, lawyers, teachers, and even businessmen, who have tattoos and/or piercings, and are qualified to successfully complete the tasks they are given on a daily basis. Whether these people had tattoos or not, each individual would have the same educations and same work ethic. If someone who had tattoos and/or piercings was serving a customer, and this customer knew the employee had tattoos, the service would be no different if the customer did not know. This clearly shows that having tattoos and modifications in the workplace is not a negative thing. However, in Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi’s article they state that Dr. Elzweig advises, “Employees need to use discretion in the workplace. In addition, employers need to recognize that the paradigm is shifting and that body modifications are becoming more mainstream” (Texas A&M University-Corpus
Tattoos have been around for over 5,000 years they are not something new, yet society still treats them like they are. Their new found popularity should be celebrated amongst everyone. You do not have to get a tattoo to be accepting of the fact that others have them. If tattoos were more openly accepted by society, there would be less of a social divide amongst each other. Tattoos are just another medium of art, we are told to embrace art and to evolve as human beings. Part of that process is to accept all forms of art without excluding one, just because you think it might be
They should change the rules of having to cover them up. There shouldn’t be discrimination to a person with them and them having a lower percentage of getting a job because they have visible tattoos. The workplace should make the dress code policy less strict and should allow for people with tattoos to have the same changes of getting the job as much as everyone else. Also on stapaw.com they list off 10 reasons why tattoos and piercings should be covered in the workplace. Four of those reasons related directly to this essay explaining the workplace’s reasons why they believe tattoos shouldn’t be allowed in the workplace.
There’s also been appearance discrimination on Individuals that like self-expression and therefore tattoo their bodies. As David Kirby states, in “Inked Well”, “[I]n addition to being nasty and unsanitary, tattoos only grace the skins of either bottom feeders or those who pretend they are” (693). To make a statement so profound based off an individual having tattoos is abhorrent and absurd. A tattoo does not define a person as being a criminal or bottom feeder. As Kirby later realized, “Tattoos have always been a means of identifying oneself, notes Ms.DeMello, and are always meant to be read”( 695). Tattoos are a way of self-expression, a way of art and are also spiritual and meaningful to the individuals with them. As Kirby interviewed a couple individuals he came across a woman named Jodie, “ Jodie was the sweetest, the most articulate, and the most heavily inked…Jodie explained that she had been a “cutter” who “was having a lot of trouble with hurting myself physically for various reasons, so I began to get tattoos”(694). Tattoos can have a positive meaning behind them. Jodie’s comment shows that people with tattoos are not criminals or bottom feeder but articulate individuals. Therefore, it’s not valid to discriminate on an individual that had a choice to be