Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is discrimination of physical appearance
What Are The Importants Of Tattoo
Tattoo in culture and society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is discrimination of physical appearance
I am writing to inform you that in your article about Charlotte Tumiltry you have made incorrect accusations about individuals with tattoos. Throughout this letter I will raise valid points and hopefully succeed in changing your point of view about people with tattoos.
Firstly, you argued that, “teachers shouldn’t have tattoos because it looks unprofessional”. Being professional has nothing to do with your looks. You are just making an assumption and saying that all of the human population who have been inked look unprofessional. This remark you made is incorrect and this is because the majority of people who are working in high class professions have tattoos. For example one of the most successful human beings in history was Muhammad Ali. Even though he had inking it didn’t stop him achieving his goal and in today’s society he is a role model to others. So if an educator gets a tattoo what difference would it make? She is still qualified enough to teach. Wouldn’t you be outraged if someone discriminated against you just because of your inking?
Furthermore, I believe that an individual may have a tattoo, no matter what field of work they are doing and this is because that
…show more content…
person owns their own body and may do whatever they like with it. The thought that companies will not hire someone because they have inking on their body not only blows my mind but is absurd. Companies are not supposed to judge people on ethnicity, age, gender or looks, but they can turn away potential employees because they're tattooed? Tattoos have absolutely no effect on people’s intelligence, personality or skills. Hence getting a picture inked on your body doesn’t affect the person on the inside. You correspondingly mentioned that “tattoos give the British a bad reputation”, this comment that you made is highly incorrect.
This is due to the fact that tattoos are a piece of art and they are considered as a very important piece of work. In fact it arguably is one of the oldest forms of painting in history. In books and Egyptian work we can perceive that tattoos are a fragment of history and they’re for people from negative backgrounds. People in cultures all around the world are “judging books by their covers” and bodies. The primary focus of modern tattoos is self-expression. The stereotypes associated with tattoos are slowly being disbanded and now accepted around the world in multiple countries. So if it doesn’t give other countries a bad reputation then why should it give Britain
one? You claimed that young people might be innovated to have ridiculous tattoos if they see their teachers with them. Your actual words were: “we don’t want the kiddies getting encouraging signals about inking a pineapple on their nose at such a tender age”. I strongly believe that the majority of individuals won’t be influenced from others. This is because each person has a different personality and so a different taste, so actually instead of encouraging them they might actually discourage them. Furthermore getting a tattoo requires you to be eighteen. At this age all young people are mature enough to think for themselves and make decisions for themselves. Expanding on the same point, teachers are a whole different generation than students which means that a majority will not follow the same path. Most, if not all will consider celebrities, famous people, students and people their age as role models for style and taste. Additionally, you stated that: “tattoo of a giant cheryl rose on their buttocks or hot cross buns on their buns”. Here indirectly you are saying that people with art on their body are irresponsible and thoughtless. This statement you made is inaccurate and this is because when people get tattoos they are responsible enough to make that decision. Only a small minority will decide to get inappropriate inking. Secondly who are you to evaluate an individual’s tattoos? Individuals may get a variety which isn’t ill-advised and some people have religious emblems, so are you saying that even those are irresponsible? Every tattoo may vary from person to person. Two individuals having similar tattoos may not necessarily intend the same meaning. A majority of people get them to represent an event in their life or a specific time which they won’t forget. I personally believe that your body is like an empty canvas. Getting a tattoo just makes your body stand out and makes it unique from other people’s bodies.
His work has also made it possible for the non-conformists to know that their attitude towards tattoos is shallow and that in the near future, they are likely to also have tattoos because the rebelliousness is growing. The manner in which people have transformed and embraced the tattoo culture is also so strong that any negative comment against tattoos will be offensive to most people in the society. Brooks work has therefore achieved its aim of enabling people to understand that they have conformed to the tattooing culture.
Sperry, K. (1991). Tattoos And Tattooing. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 12(4), 356. Retrieved November 29, 2013, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000433-199112000-00042
In Kosut’s article “The Artification of Tattoo: Transformations within a Cultural Field”, the author takes a look at how tattoos are a form of art and should be seen this way. It also indicates how tattoo artists have to have a technical skill in order to do this job and should be seen as actual artists and not overlooked. In addition to having steady hands like a surgeon, tattoo artists create original work for their clients. If tattoo artists and their work were seen as a legitimate career, it would be even more likely that tattoos would be accepted in society.
This is completely invalid. I classify inappropriate as being vulgar or containing profanity or nudity. Of course, there are tattoos that contain these elements, to which I would say should not be displayed in the workplace. But any tattoos that do not demonstrate this should not have to be covered. An individual cannot make the excuse that a tattoo or piercing is inappropriate, just because he or she disagrees with the modified person’s decisions. I believe that tattooed and pierced individuals are discriminated against for the reason that they do not meet other people’s
Americans have been continuously encouraged to support and appreciate art. People are taught to appreciate paintings from a young age. They are informed that being unique is all right. Inventiveness and self-expression are continually being supported. Then, why are people so judgmental when they see an individual with tattoos? Numerous individuals decide to cover their bodies with tattoos. In fact, Jon Kelly, states in BBC News Magazine that, “Tattoos are more popular than ever, but workers can be dismissed from or denied jobs for the reason of their body modifications.” Although people have tattoos, it does not mean they have been in a gang or are violent, and it does not infer that they are not as competent or accomplishing as an individual without a tattoo. Tattoos are not character qualities. However, individuals with tattoos may not be considered for specific occupations, just for the reason that they make decisions with their own bodies; and they may be judged.
Tattoos have been used as a form of decoration on the body of the Egyptian mummies. In fact, tattoos were viewed as a “beautifying operation” to the Typee natives and in Wales they were once a royal fad. There have been many eras to see the tattoo as a prestigious decoration. The Japanese also practiced a form of tattooing that covered their warriors in intimidating designs. But after years of beauty and prestige, what changed the views of people? What made tattoos rebellious and unprofessional?
There still is a lot of intolerance towards people who have tattoos especially towards people who have a lot of them but these days a tattoo here and there is not looked down as it once was. There was a time when only "low lives," were thought of as having tattoos and people who had them were dirty criminals and should not be associated with. Due to the mainstream of the world not accepting the practicing of tattoos many tattooists and their clients went into an underground state. It was not always easy for people to even find a tattoo artist even if they were brave enough to be labeled a "low life" by the majority of culture. A lot of places even banned tattooing due to the fact that they thought tattooing was morally wrong and a health risk. Tattooing was still illegal in New York City until 1993. The mystery that surrounds the art of tattooing has always created ignorant ideas from people who are misinformed.
Even though tattoos are becoming part of culture and socially acceptable, the negative and prejudiced attitudes towards those with body art are still present. Not all tattoos are gang related, and one must note that they have historically been a symbol of someone’s culture or religion. Other tattoos may have just a personal meaning to its owner and was not intended to be offensive. People also do not understand that a tattoo may impede them from pursuing a professional career, regardless of their qualifications. Employers realize that the need to recruit workers from different backgrounds are important in such a competitive workforce, so they provide accommodation by having reasonable dress code policies.
A controversial topic today is whether or not body piercings and tattoos should be accepted by professionals working in health care. Currently, tattoos and piercings are allowed in health care as long as they are not visible. According to one of the studies, “Body piercing is defined as a piercing of the body anywhere other than the earlobes” (Westerfield). Therefore, the only visible piercings allowed are small studs in the lobes of the ears for females. The reason body piercings and tattoos are not suggested in health care is that they keep someone from looking professional as well as making them look intimidating. Not everyone sees them that way. The opposing side is that they do not affect
A persons’ image is vital when meeting someone for the first time. Our peers, employers, family, superiors, even strangers that you walk past can automatically judge someone, and imagine how they present themselves to the world. Tattoos have been predominantly linked with a rebellious attitude and pictured on out of control stereotypes such as rock starts, bikers, sailors, and disobedient teenagers who want nothing more than to hack off their parents. With a new coming of age generation and a step into a more lenient and liberal society these types of patrons still participate in body art but so do doctors, lawyers, or just the run of the mill house mom. Tattoos signify religious beliefs, cultural influence, or each individual’s sole style. Body art is no longer socially offensive, employers are more apt to hiring tatted hopeful applicants, parents are warming up to the idea of their children inking their body and no longer a stranger on the street with a tattoo is necessarily prejudged as a criminal or safety hazard. Tattoos have become more evolved over the years because they have become more of a socially accepted element of the general public.
In the twenty-first century, where people want to express themselves and their art, getting a tattoo isn’t all about representing gangs or committing crimes anymore. Times have changed and what people might consider normal nowadays wouldn’t be considered normal in the past. In the article, Secret Ink: Tattoo’s Place in Contemporary American Culture, states that, “The expanding popularity of tattoos seems to be based on the fact that these can serve various purposes for different individuals. Some use them as a fashion tool whereas others use them as a method of identity formation, such as commemorating a lost loved one or representing one’s neighborhood.” (Roberts 163). This challenges my assumptions because it argues that not all individuals that own tattoos don’t always get them for the intention of being perceived as criminals but rather for something that is very personal to them. My assumptions are influenced on what tattoos used to mean from the past more than what they mean in this era. For example, not all people who have tattoos are affiliated with gangs. “Perhaps some of these historically negative connotations have permitted the subconscious thoughts of society and perceptions o f modem day tattoo.” (Foltz 593). This quote challenges and proves that people still hold these perceptions towards those individuals that have tattoos because they still think of them on how they were
“The impact on the world today through the history and visual reasoning behind tattoos, lead to the inquiry of personal life changing experiences.
Tattoos are a controversial subject in the world we live in. The kind of people that get tattoos is now varied to almost all humans regardless of race, religion, or age. What many people fail to understand or realize is how much of an effect a tattoo can have on the rest of your life. The original tattoo stereotypes have faded from what they were many years ago and yet tattoos still have a reputation as for what kind of people get tattoos. There are many reasons as to why people would get a tattoo but there are many reason why you should think before you ink. Our society and the social media today has a huge impact on the tattoo industry. Movie stars and pop singers with many tattoos are posing as role models for our generation and
..., total approval of women with tattoos is still a long way off. The tattoo industry is still male dominated, even with 50% of clients being made up of females. Even though groups exist that attempt to empower tattooed women, such as The Gypsy Queens, those women who choose to alter their bodies with ink continue to face social discrimination. Thompson made an excellent point by saying that a “critical step that can be taken is for employment discrimination against tattooed people to end” and that “people should only be fired on the basis of their work performance, not their appearance.” Being a heavily tattooed woman I agree wholeheartedly. As a society we need to promote acceptance and understanding. Each person should be judged solely on their merits and capability; whether or not I choose to tattoo my body should not be a determining factor in any facet of life.
... no sense for a job to tell people what they can do with their body lets alone if it is not innapropiete why not? If theres no violence why not let whom ever wants tattoos to go ahead and get it with out telling them they cant be hired or they will be fired. I hope that in a couple of years from now more jobs will see eye to eye with me that having tattoos doesnt make u a bad person it makes you different it shows can tell so much about a person and there are so many rich people that do have tattoos. Some people dont get tattoos because of their parents but whatever there reason i stand by each and every person that deiceds to put body art on themselves. some people dont see tattoos as art but yet if it wasnt then why do tattoo ARTIST charge from 100+ at a professional shop. One day i beileve people will no longer think that theres has to be restrictions to tattoos.