The Importance Of Tattoos

1163 Words3 Pages

Winston Churchill, President Theodore Roosevelt, and John Fetterman they all have something in common and that is tattoos. I am here to argue that tattoos can be view as freedom of expression, strong Naval tradition, and more importantly no hindrance on job performance. The Marine Corps should have no restrictions on tattoos. Over the past 50 years’ tattoos have continued to grow in popularity, yet the Marine Corps wants to place restrictions on their service members; claiming their policy is designed to help their service members to maintain a discipline appearance. It would be proven that tattoo is viewed as favorable by royalty and the elite. Freedom of expression, Before one can truly understand the stance This became clear and concise with the following statement: “The American people expect Marines to be disciplined, physically fit, and ready to accomplish any mission. They also expect Marines to possess esprit de corps and a squared away and sharp personal appearance” (Marine Corps Bulletin 1020, 2016). Today, tattooing is the sixth-fastest-growing retail business in the United States, and the single fastest growing demographic group seeking a tattoo is middle-class suburban women (Cartoon, 2016). To put it plainly, the specialty of tattooing no more just engages insubordinate "social freaks." Rather, you are general as prone to discover a Fortune 500 executive, Doctor, Governor and Attorney are wearing a tattoo as a punk rocker. Seeing how 73 percent of today youth are receiving their first tattoos at 18 years of age, the chance of coming across a wage earner with tattoos is highly probable. Many contemporary companies stress commitments to diversity and inclusion, tattoos are becoming increasingly unproblematic across the board (Hennessey, 2013). A declaration as such supports my claim and that is the Marine corps needs to revisit their restriction guidelines in regards to

Open Document