Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tattoos a form of self expression and individual identity
Tattoos a form of self expression and individual identity
Personal and social significance of tattoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For the last few months there has been an ongoing debate about whether troops with tattoos should have to get them removed or exit the military. Sgt. Maj. Raymond Chandler states that the new policy will not allow troops to have tattoos that are racist, extremist, and or sexist .Also under the new policy recruits cannot have tattoos below the knee and elbow and above the neckline (Stars and Stripes). Why is this just limited to the new recruits? As Chandler also stated the older troops that have tattoos will have to go through a grandfathering process for their, but they still cannot have a one that falls in the category of being vulgar(Stars and Stripes). No matter what their classification is they will have to meet with an army counselor to self-identify the meaning and discuss what will happen if they have to get it removed. While it is true that a person’s tattoos can tell a story about them, it does not necessarily dictate how well a person can perform their assigned job. It is now a heated discussion amongst the soldiers about whether it is fair or not for them to have to go through this. I firmly support troops not having to get their tattoo removed.
Why the Army thinks this Change is important.
As the late 90’s early 2000’s came in we were bombarded with war activity and were in high demand for troops. So as a result, the army loosened up on its requirements for enlistees. They overlooked weight standards, behavioral issues, felony charges, non- high school graduates and many more issues. While time went on they enlisted more troops than they needed, which gave them an all-time high of roughly 570,000 troops (Breaking Defense). Why is it such a big deal now that people have tattoos? Chandler states that the army wa...
... middle of paper ...
...eb. 23 Oct. 2013.
Geete, Stephanie Van, Staff Sgt. Www.army.mil. United States Army, 19 Sept. 2009. Web. 23 Oct. 424222013.
Dallet, Lydia. "Army Tattoo Regulations Are Set To Change, And Soldiers Aren't Happy."Business 00101Insider. N.p., 26 Sept. 2013. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.
"Troops Voice Anger over New Grooming Rules." Army Times. N.p., 19 May 2012. Web. 24 Oct. 2013.
Freedberg, Sydney J., Jr. "Breaking Defense." Breaking Defense. N.p., 25 Sept. 2013. Web. 24 Oct. 11111112013.
Quillin, Martha. "With Stricter Army Rules Coming, Tattoos Are a Priority." Washington Post. The Washington Post, 17 Oct. 2013. Web. 24 Oct. 2013
Reuters. "U.S. Army Weighs New Tattoo Policy." Chicago Tribune. N.p., 25 Sept. 2013. Web. 24 Oct. 2013
Web. 08 Nov. 2013."The Story of One Soldier Challenging Military Uniforms - The Takeaway." Takeaway. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Nov. 2013.
The Bill of Rights
Central America has seen tragic events happen to their people, but none as the stories in …after… and The Tattooed Soldier have to share. The main characters in the two books share many themes as they both struggle to survive during the war. This is one of the worst times for Guatemala people because they are left in poverty and the individuals are in the middle of everything trying to survive. They share stories looking back at the war and show how they got to where they are now, while others are telling a story as they live through the war. People died because of some form of mark or symbol that they carried with them during the war or because of someone they were, and this led them to their death. During that time two things are connected
In Hector Tobar’s The Tattooed Soldier, Antonio migrated from Guatemala saw Longoria in the L.A. who killed Elena and Carlitos, who are Antonio’s spouse and son. People lived in Los Angles were frustrated with the government and power system at the time. Consequently, Antonio got revenge against Longoria for Antonio’s family, others who were murdered by Longoria in Guatemala, and his justice. Justice is based on an absolute human right: the right to life, and whatever violates that right is unjust. If the power system is allowed to violate vulnerable people, the weak have a choice to use violence to attempt to reveal the responsibility of those who abused power. However, seeking violent revenge is also unjust because it violates the right to life. Nonviolent resistance can be further power to save the victims without contravening the right to life.
The United States Army, in its current state, is a profession of arms. In order to be considered a profession, the organization must have an ethical code rooted in values, strong trust with its clients, and be comprised of experts within the trade. These experts are constantly developing the trade for the present and the future and hold the same shared view of their trade culture. The Army currently has an ethical code embodied in the Army Values, which provides guidance to the individual and the organization. These values are universal across the Army, regardless of an individual’s personal background or religious morals.
Kock, Phillip. The Depiction of Violence and the Soldier's everyday life in Michael Herr's"Dispatches" and Tim O'Brien's"The Things they carried". Munchen: GRIN Verlag, 2010.
O'Shea, Brandon J. "ARMY.MIL, The Official Homepage of the United States Army." "OPERATION POWER PACK. N.p., 20 Apr. 2010. Web. 27 Feb. 2014.
"Update: Women in the Military." Issues and Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 29 May 2007. Web.
Department of Defense, Director of Administration and Management. (2012). Dod civil liberties program(DoDI 1000.29). Retrieved from website: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/100029p.pdf
Society’s outlook on “what’s in” changes every day, from what’s hot to what’s not. Fads repeat themselves over time and grow to be something that everyone now loves. Tattoos are the main trending thing of this century. They were once only a symbolism for criminals, sailors, prostitutes, and bikers, but now tattooing is mainstream in today’s times. Tattoos are seen as works of arts and your body is the canvas for aspiring tattoo artist. Nowadays there is such a wide variety of tattoos with different meanings, such as, a hand print of a loved one to someone’s favorite quote or bible verse. Some tattoos don’t always have to have meaning behind it. Anyone can decorate their body simply because they want meaningless, but artsy and funny tattoos. Inking up is becoming a significant part of someone’s life whether there is a meaning behind the tattoo or not, it is a growing thing to do and it doesn’t seem to be stopping anytime soon.
Looking back at how people perceived tattoos then and how many "normal" people have them today shows a lot about how the world has changed, specifically in mainstream society. These days one can thrown a rock and hit a tattoo shop, but why the change of heart? Why are tattoos so popular now? Holly Tuesday, a writer for "Skin & Ink" tattoo magazine and heavily tattooed person said "We all, myself included, like to think that we stand out from the crowd.
...businesses should probably think twice about setting a stricter dress code when an employee gets a tattoo, and widen their view of what the new “norm” is in today’s culture.
Even though tattoos are becoming part of culture and socially acceptable, the negative and prejudiced attitudes towards those with body art are still present. Not all tattoos are gang related, and one must note that they have historically been a symbol of someone’s culture or religion. Other tattoos may have just a personal meaning to its owner and was not intended to be offensive. People also do not understand that a tattoo may impede them from pursuing a professional career, regardless of their qualifications. Employers realize that the need to recruit workers from different backgrounds are important in such a competitive workforce, so they provide accommodation by having reasonable dress code policies.
There are many militaries throughout the world but the US Military is seen as the most professional and capable military in the world. We are perceived this way due to our rules and regulations that have branched from our fundamental principles and doctrine. Uniformity is one of our leading regulations in the military. Uniformity is what makes the military have a professional image. It is the basis of our instructions and regulations concerning the dress and appearance of our military personnel. Recently however, the Pentagon has decided that it is more important to accommodate certain groups of people then to have a professional and uniform military. On January 22nd 2014 the Pentagon passed a new policy that is easing up on the existing regulations by allowing beards, turbans, headscarf’s, tattoos and piercings of religious nature to be worn while in uniform (Pellerin, 2014). This new policy has started a heated debate about whether this is a good idea or not. I myself believe that this policy should not be allowed because it is undermining basic military values, lowering our standards on regulations, and it is a start to a new undesirable military force.
A persons’ image is vital when meeting someone for the first time. Our peers, employers, family, superiors, even strangers that you walk past can automatically judge someone, and imagine how they present themselves to the world. Tattoos have been predominantly linked with a rebellious attitude and pictured on out of control stereotypes such as rock starts, bikers, sailors, and disobedient teenagers who want nothing more than to hack off their parents. With a new coming of age generation and a step into a more lenient and liberal society these types of patrons still participate in body art but so do doctors, lawyers, or just the run of the mill house mom. Tattoos signify religious beliefs, cultural influence, or each individual’s sole style. Body art is no longer socially offensive, employers are more apt to hiring tatted hopeful applicants, parents are warming up to the idea of their children inking their body and no longer a stranger on the street with a tattoo is necessarily prejudged as a criminal or safety hazard. Tattoos have become more evolved over the years because they have become more of a socially accepted element of the general public.
Tattoos are a controversial subject in the world we live in. The kind of people that get tattoos is now varied to almost all humans regardless of race, religion, or age. What many people fail to understand or realize is how much of an effect a tattoo can have on the rest of your life. The original tattoo stereotypes have faded from what they were many years ago and yet tattoos still have a reputation as for what kind of people get tattoos. There are many reasons as to why people would get a tattoo but there are many reason why you should think before you ink. Our society and the social media today has a huge impact on the tattoo industry. Movie stars and pop singers with many tattoos are posing as role models for our generation and
The AD does not authorize Soldiers to wear them outside of the designated locations, on