Servant Leadership Behavior Paper

Are leaders born or created? We hold leaders at the pinnacle of society. They are often times those who hold strong ideals and are adequate at making decisions. Additionally, they seem to possess distinct leadership characteristics that boast vast influence, and indirectly convey just how their individual methods differ. This paper will evaluate leader behavior and every concept that develops and refines leadership.

The studies concluded that the overall lifestyle of supervisors affected their behaviors. Factors such as gender, age, educational qualification and experience were direct influences of the leadership behavior. The research determined that leaders who had more divergent thinking and openness conveyed a high correlation in cognitive ability and personality relations. This trend was reflected in the subordinates as well. Servant leadership worked primarily through follower need satisfaction. Transformational leadership worked mainly through perceived leadership effectiveness. The study determined that leadership behavior is a natural occurrence. At the very base level, it is akin to animalistic behaviors.

The researchers labeled leadership as a characteristic that is

The correlation of such was compared with that of their subordinates’ job expectancies and tendencies. The researches conducted the experiment to evaluate transformational leadership. They hoped to determine how it directly related to creativity disposition. The researchers set out to determine how servant leadership (SL) and transformational leadership (TFL) differed. The goal was to see how each adversely affected their followers. The researchers wanted to identify how human leadership and followership originated. They found that animals shared the same tendencies and thus used this to understand, predict, and improve modern