Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational leadership synergistic leadership organizational change development
Leadership In Public Administration
Leadership In Public Administration
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Leadership has many definitions and meanings with those definitions evoking various descriptions. Administrative leaders must consider planning, decision-making, financial, cultural, communication, logistical, and maintenance concerns on a day to day basis (Karabanoff, 2013; Swanson, Territo, & Taylor, 2012; Williams & Kellough, 2006). Leadership is multidimensional. It is fluid, self-motivated, and circumstantial. Courage and fairness signify main characteristics of an established administrative professional. Applicable leadership behavior in one situation may not necessarily apply to the next. Law enforcement leaders often are so focused on their departments' mission of crime prevention that they fail to recognize where the department stands as a team within the organization (Karabanoff, 2013; Williams & Kellough, 2006). The desired outcome of where the agency will be in the future and the legacy the department will leave behind cannot be overstated. The preferred goal is to create a well-trained and better-equipped squad of officers to take on the business of administering the law and be exceptional public servants (Karabanoff, 2013).
Leaders often are seers by advantage of their capability to plan ahead, focus on important issues, and create a better working environment by implementing small, progressive steps (Karabanoff, 2013). This can involve risk taking, leadership agility, tactical management, and thinking critically, as well as carefully. However, these characteristics do not substitute for the importance of a leader to have a clear outline of management and a plan to execute it. Law enforcement administrators are accountable to the political leaders, the community, and the employees for motivating leadership and operat...
... middle of paper ...
...in situations. The contingency models concentrated on the fit between personality characteristics, leader behaviors, and situational variables, but did not make clear which ones or what grouping of these determine effective leadership. The theory approach to leadership supports the argument that effective leaders are able to address both the duties and human characteristics of their organizations (Brown & Trevino, 2006). Leadership remains to be recognized as a complex enterprise, and as recent research suggests, effective leaders are more than managers (Swanson et al., 2012). They have vision, develop a shared vision, and value the contributions and efforts of their subordinates in the organization. Transformational leadership holds promise to further an understanding of effective leadership, in particular the leadership required for the ever-changing organization.
One may wonder exactly what it is that qualities a strong leader possesses. A strong leader is determined, and strong willed. They must be of good judgment, and without bias. They cannot easily be persuaded, and they are firm, yet at the same time, a good lead must also empathize with his subordinates, and have the best interest at heart for said subordinates, at all times. However, with that being said, a good leader cannot be afraid to discipline his subordinates when necessary. Unmistakably, being a leader is a very difficult feat – one which not everyone can accomplish. A leader must be an authority, a friend and a counsellor, all at once. They must be responsible, and always take into account the disadvantages of a situation. Not everyone is suitable to be a leader, whereas, just about anybody can be a good role model.
In an area of work such as law enforcement relationships built upon trust and reciprocity go a long way in helping both leaders and followers. Not only will Detective Doe’s relationships and personal growth benefit but it has been proven that his group’s cohesion and participation will also be improved by the development of strong leader-follower relationships (Naidoo et al. 2011, Sparrowe et al. 2006). Regarding this it is also important that Detective Doe is careful regarding the use of transactional leadership, specifically related to extrinsic rewards. It is clearly extremely difficult to be solely one and also be a good leader since a balance transformational leadership and transactional leadership make a strong leader (Judge & Piccolo 2004). It is absolutely necessary though to try and keep rewards intrinsic and keep people motivated by their self-satisfaction than extrinsic compensation. If too many extrinsic rewards are offered as compensation than many people may lose their initial interests and reasons for entering the field of law enforcement (Deci
William Bratton, born and raised in Boston, was appointed as New York City’s new police commissioner by Mayor Rudolph Giuliani on December 2, 1993. William Bratton was a leader who spent his whole life turning around low-performing, dysfun-ctional police departments. It was his specialty and it soon became his trademark. Bill Bratton hit the ground running as the commissioner of police by implementing several policies and visions that he had, that many believed would be unfathomable in policing. His goals were revolutionary and unprecedented and would not be possible to achieve if not for his incredible leadership ability. His ability as an effective leader allowed him to select intelligent, experienced, and quality individuals who shared identical beliefs and visions as he did. Any leader would agree that anything is possible through optimism, intelligent planning, and preparation, but nothing is possible if your chosen “executives” lack the leader’s confidence to operate freely and carry out the organization’s ultimate goals. Bratton was a believer in Theodore Roosevelt’s ideology that “the best executive is the one who has sense enough to pick good men to do what he wants done, and self- restraint enough to keep from meddling with them while they do it.” Bratton was a master motivator. His optimism rubbed off on everyone around him and this reflected their performance. He had a belief that “leadership is the ability to enthuse and encourage the people in your organization so highly that, whatever idea is put into action, they embrace it so fully they forget the genesis and assume it was their own” (Bratton pg.155). This was Br...
Toxic leadership, likely found in all agencies at some point, and the general awareness of toxic leaders with whom individual officers have worked, makes this a real problem for law enforcement agencies. Knowing the root and cause of this type of leadership helps develop understanding on the part of those that can effect a change in leadership within an agency. Comprehending the methods by which such environments develop and their negative impact on the agency as a whole - via individual officers’ experiences, opens the doors on hidden collusion that destroy morale.
The five styles of police leadership are autocratic, bureaucratic, diplomatic, participative, and free-rein. I feel the best type of leadership is the combination of a bureaucratic and participative style. I think these two styles are important to have because the bureaucratic style makes decisions by consulting their supervisor then make a precise planning to make sure everything goes well according to the law and regulation. A great leader needs to make sure what they do is absolutely lawful and not leading their team in danger. A great leader also needs understand their team members well and assign each individual based on their ability and expertise. Consulting with team members before execution is better so that every member understand
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Hays, K. L., Regoli, R. M., & Hewitt, J. D. (2007). Police Chiefs, Anomia, and Leadership. Sage .
Kouzes, J., & Posner, B., (2007). The leadership challenge, (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-
Transformational leadership consists of few components which are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, management by exception and contingent rewards (Ahmad et al.,
Leaders are the individuals who help to create options and opportunities. They help in identifying the choices and solve the problems. They build commitment and coalitions. Leaders do this by inspiring others and working along with them to construct the shared vision of the possibilities and commitments of a better group, organization or community. They engage the followers in such a way that most of the followers become leaders in their own right. The variety of demands of an increasingly complex world very often require that leadership be shared by most of the members of an organization, in appropriate ways for different situations. A leader is the on...
All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, require leadership. Maintaining a dependable leadership structure is key to the success of any organization. The philosophy of the modern style of police leadership involves a leader who is strong, competitive and unreceptive to change. Police leadership is based from an autocratic style which is founded on integrity and courage, embracing teamwork, involvement and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). This style of leadership works well in an emergency situation in which rapid decision making and strict control is needed. The negative aspect to this style of leadership is the inability of the organization to function with the absence of leadership.
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
A leader's situation or environment plays a critical role in his or her success or failure, especially in today's ever-changing organizations and marketplace. The contingency and situational leadership perspectives, such as Fiedler's Contingency Theory of Leadership and Hersey and Blanchard's Situational Leadership Theory, proposed that a leader's effectiveness is influenced by situational factors as well, rather than simply traits and behaviors. Both leadership theories introduced a pragmatic approach to leadership by recognizing leadership as an interactive process involving the leader, the follower, and other internal and external organizational factors. Fiedler and Hersey and Blanchard's theories broke ground in the leadership field by departing from the “one style fits all” leadership
2. I have seen supervisors that held no one accountable for anything. I have seen some that would not deal with any problems between members in their unit and were commonly referred to as the “ostrich” because they kept their head in the sand and pretended there were no issues. I have seen first hand how that type of leadership also damaged morale and unit cohesion. One interesting thing that I have noticed over the years is that almost every true leader I have encountered in law enforcement was consequent...
Many people associate leadership with a specific job title or form of power within an organization. However, through personal experience, I have concluded that leadership can come in many forms and position as well as from multiple sources of roles and job titles both with and without power. Based on the definition of leadership, anyone can be considered a leader as long as they have the ability to influence people to achieve a particular result or goal which benefits the organization or group as a whole. Individuals with a secure sense of self and understanding, acceptance of diversity within an organization tend to be the strongest leaders that not only make others want to follow, but they also encourage other leaders to gravitate to their