Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Police leadership principals
Police Leadership And Management Principles
Leadership in police organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Police leadership principals
The five styles of police leadership are autocratic, bureaucratic, diplomatic, participative, and free-rein. I feel the best type of leadership is the combination of a bureaucratic and participative style. I think these two styles are important to have because the bureaucratic style makes decisions by consulting their supervisor then make a precise planning to make sure everything goes well according to the law and regulation. A great leader needs to make sure what they do is absolutely lawful and not leading their team in danger. A great leader also needs understand their team members well and assign each individual based on their ability and expertise. Consulting with team members before execution is better so that every member understand
their role to reduce misunderstanding and confusion. In our society needs leaders who can explain the plan and avoid arbitrary decisions. If a plan is legitimate and not put any members of the team at risk is a great plan if not it may seem like self-promotion. If a leader only makes decisions based on their beliefs, rather consult with others than there is no room for self-improvement. Members have expertise should be able to contribute their thoughts and consult on their experience in this field. Know the abilities of team members and performance will help reduce the risk when making a plan. For example, when needs to handle a situation where hands on is needed and require combative skill and the leader decided to put a member who has none combative skill vs. someone who is more expert in this field than it is irrational decision making.
In looking at the Kansas City Patrol Experiment, it appears that adding more police officers has little or no affect on arrests or the crime rate. Please review the study and explain why more police does not mean less crime. Due Date March 11, 2005
would just like to piggyback off what you said by saying that police subculture is a method used to set a standard of behavior that is considered to be appropriate for law enforcement personnel. A strong cultural value among police is considered to be inportant to act tough and demonstrate to fellow officers that they are capable of handling just about anything. Sometimes displays of emotion are not encouraged, because this may demonstrate an image that police officers are weak. Therefore, officers often keep problems to themselves. However, this same culture appreciates dry, sarcastic humor that may seem dark to outsiders, but it allows officers to mentally deal with disturbing situations.
The word culture means a group of people sharing the same beliefs, values, knowledge and behavior. The culture of policemen evolved as with the development of policing. Policeman is individuals empowered by the state to enforce law, serve and protect. The word police have a history from a Greek word called politeia. The word politeia in Greek was used to refer to dealings that affected the stability and safety of the Greek State. In the 18 century the word “police” were taken from the French and brought into the English language. King Louis XlV organized the first central police force in 1667 to police Paris, because back then Paris was the largest city in Europe. August “Gus” Vollmer was known as the father of policing because he started the first school, where officers could learn the law of evidence. In 1905 August became the first chief in Berkeley, California. He also was the first chief to tell his department to use the lie detector. August Vollmer was the first American officer to incorporate the use of blood, fiber, and analysis in a criminal investigation. Technology in policing began to advance in the 1800’s. DNA was discovered 1868, and in 1882 Alphonse Bertillon used anthropometrics as a mean of identification. As years past they continue advancing in policing. How policing is run now and how it was ran in the early years are totally different. Strict laws and consequences are put into place, and by then there was any. All these things affect police culture, and that’s what makes culture of policing different then the culture of policing in the early years.
To think one style of leadership is the only style seems rather pompous. You have several different types and brands of blood pressure pills to lower the blood pressure depending on the cause, therefore why would we think we only need one type of leader. At times I am needed to make a decision that I do not ask for outside participation. For example the attendance policy. I decided what would be a fair policy, how many points would be assigned for each call off and how long each point would stay active for. The situation did not need a meeting, it did not need input for others. I utilized a laisse fair style when the nurses were complaining about medication pass times. I simply gave them the task to develop a standardized medication time and let me know. When I hold a risk meeting I have several nurses and other disciplines present to assist at problem solving risk behaviors and that also means trying new techniques. Every situation is different and it is my responsibility, as the leader, to know which style would work best in each situation; sometimes it also depends on the people involved. Some staff need a leader to stand back more, others need one to effectively manage them. So not only do I have to know the situation, I also need to be sensitive to the persons involved, why it is important for me to know the staff I work
Public Safety (2007) has stated that throughout history almost everyone have wanted a form of protection so they did not have to live in fear every time they left their house. People generally want to live their lives knowing that they are safe. It is not known for sure where the origins of police work have actually begun. During the medieval times, fudal lords would hire strong men who would ensure that everyone paid their taxes. These hired brutes attempted to maintain some sort of order throughout the kingdom among the people. Unfortunately, in most cases, these men only followed their employer’s wishes and did not handle situations in honest or civilized ways (p.142).
I believe the chain of command is important in a police agency for many reasons. It is a roadmap that shows the route within the organization that order would flow coming down through the organization or that requests flow going up the organization, like a two-way street. The chain of command also establishes formal lines of communication within the department for organizational purposes and it must be used by everyone to communicate formally. This will eliminate crucial departmental problems. For example, if the chief administrative level does not follow the chain of command downward and gives an order directly to the patrol officer, this could cause confusion. For example, the supervisory level might feel that it is alright to do the same thing sending information up the chain. The purpose of the chain of command is to show individuals who their bosses are, from the chief
In my opinion, the many different views of police culture can vary in many different situations. I say this because of the many different views this can be misleading at times. I think what's needed is reform of a police culture that has often infected relations between police and blacks, destabilized respect for cops and the law, and set the basis for the many deaths. The overall image of the police offers is an overview of the public’s perception of the police in reality. Without the public’s view of this police culture wouldn’t have the look it has now. Specific characteristics of the publics, association, or foundation remain interchangeable. Actions of the overall image are valuable because they
All organizations, especially law enforcement agencies, require leadership. Maintaining a dependable leadership structure is key to the success of any organization. The philosophy of the modern style of police leadership involves a leader who is strong, competitive and unreceptive to change. Police leadership is based from an autocratic style which is founded on integrity and courage, embracing teamwork, involvement and shared leadership (Cordner & Scarborough, 2010). This style of leadership works well in an emergency situation in which rapid decision making and strict control is needed. The negative aspect to this style of leadership is the inability of the organization to function with the absence of leadership.
A law enforcement leader must be able to call people to action, motivate, and lead individuals who otherwise would not react. Gone are the days of leaders leading from a managerial perspective, now more than ever leaders in law enforcement are the patrol officer working the streets and calling to action everyday citizens.
There are five core oriented policing strategies. Preventive patrol, routine incident response, emergency response, criminal investigation, and problem solving. Each strategies represents a way that approach situations that the police encounter.
The New Zealand Police is the lead agency responsible for helping the community to decrease or reduce crime, corruption and improve the responsibility of safety and protection in New Zealand. There is a need to make changes to the police culture in order to improve the performance of their organisation. However there are three fundamental errors that need to be addressed which will be discussed in this essay. Firstly, there is a lack of an established sense of urgency which has the potential to jeopardize the future of the organization. Secondly is, not creating a powerful enough guiding coalition which means there is a lack of communication which resulted in an absence of leadership and teamwork from frontline staff to national headquarters. Finally, an undercommunicating the vision by a factor of ten that organisation leader needs to communicate visions and strategies. These three errors are relevant as they are pivotal in the implementation of a managing change programme. Recommendations are also provided to improve on how the New Zealand Police can be enhanced within a management perspective.
If I were appointed chief executive of a law enforcement agency, the executive styles that I would adopt would be the Top Cop and the Statesman. The reasons why I would choose the Top Cop is because I like to lead by example and be heavily involved in police operations (Cordner, 2016). Another reason why I would choose Top Cop is because I feel that as a leader you have to be able to do everything that you ask your troops to do and even though I am the chief executive, there is no task that would be beneath me. It is my experience that having a leader who leads by example shows everyone “what behaviors and attitudes are most highly valued by the organization” (Cordner, 2016, p. 205). I would make sure that I am empowering my leadership personnel to make the decisions when it comes to leading and directing the men and women of the department. A great leader knows that he or she can delegate authority but the responsibility always falls on the shoulders of the leader. While as the chief executive, I understand the importance of dealing with the politicians and media and trying to be transparent with them, but my focus will be on the safety of my department as well as the overall safety of the community that we serve
In today’s society, most cops are looked at as the “bad guys”, but what if you had the opportunity to change that? What if you could pick and organize your own police force in the manner you think it should be? If that was the case police forces would get worse or better. He is how I would recruit if I was the chief of my own department.
Leadership is defined as a process by which an individual influences others to obtain goals. There are three aspects that should be addressed when explaining leadership. One aspect is that leadership is a social influence process; leadership could not exist without a leader and one or more followers. Another leadership aspect is compliance; all of the leader’s directions must be complied with voluntarily. Compliance is what separates leadership from other influence-based formal authority. Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009).
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.