Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflection paper on leadership self assessment
Reflection paper on leadership self assessment
Analyse how theories of motivation may be applied in the practice of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Reflection paper on leadership self assessment
Leadership is one of the main areas of study nowadays. A number of books, articles, and research papers are written on this discipline and we receive much information about this. Leadership is a relationship between leaders and followers, and building this relationship requires an appreciation for the personal values of those who would be willing to give their ener¬gy and talents to accomplish shared objectives. Transformational leadership and leader-member exchange are popular theories in the leadership arena. Various researchers and writers have established the validity of these concepts. A number of writers emphasize the role of fairness in the relation between a leader and a follower. In this essay I will try to compare and contrast two theories in relation to their capacity to develop differing qualities of supervisor-subordinate relationship. First we view main aspects of LMX and transformational leadership models and then discuss them in relation to their capacity to develop differing qualities of supervisor-subordinate relationships.
LMX theory emphasizes the quality of the relationships formed between members of dyad, rather than just examining the behavior and traits of them. LMX has been defined as a system of components and their relationships, involving both leader and follower, in interdependent patterns of behavior, sharing mutual outcome instrumentalities, and producing conceptions of environment and values. This theory explains the main point of exchange between two individuals and helps leaders accomplish their intentions when forming a relationship with a subordinate.
LMX theory states that the centered process of leadership is in the interaction between leaders and followers.
Make out some strengths of LM...
... middle of paper ...
...“Fairness in Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Do We All Belong on the Inside?” Kravis Leadership Institute Leadership Review, Summer 2002.
(http://www.leadershipreview.org/2002summer/article1_summer_2002.asp) viewed 03.05.2008
7. Greg Thomas, “Leader-Member Exchange Theory (LMX)”, Leadership Tip of the Month, November 2003. (http://www.leadingtoday.org/Onmag/nov03/LMX112003.html) viewed 02.05.2008
8. Tucker, Bruce A. ; Russell, Robert F., “The influence of the transformational leader”, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 2004. (http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/summary_0199-2375126_ITM) viewed 5.05.2008
9. Shaun Killian (MEd, MLead), “A practical overview of leadership theories”, Australian Leadership Development Centre, 2005-2007. (http://www.leadershipdevelopment.edu.au/Content_Common/pg-effective-theory.seo#personal%20tran) viewed 05.05.2008
ideals of leadership which could apply in a general case. This model emphasizes the fact that most leadership occurs in interpersonal interaction over an exposition to a large crowd. According to Scholl who performed a study at Jr. Labor Research Center, because leadership is constantly being evaluated by organizational members, superiors, and the public, there are always groups involved in the process as opposed to having a “formal leader” take charge (Scholl, 2003, pp. 2). He goes on to state that even though leadership assigns value to the individual role, there is never a point where the leader in that specific role exerts an absolute sphere of influence without competing claims (Scholl, 2003, pp.3). The process of exercising this type of leadership is inclusive and ethical because it gives an agency to everyone who is a part of the organization (Komives, 2007, p.74). Each person is a part of the leadership process because just be being a follower under a leader there is a relationship attached to oneself. This model is not descriptive but rather prescriptive. It tells one how to act and how to effectively lead rather than simply describe a process which can be observed in nature. The components of leadership involved include inclusivity of others views, the empowerment of those involved, being purposeful with one's goal and aligning others with that goal, and being ethical with good morals. As part of this model each component of this model must be part of a process which includes knowing, being, and doing (Komives, 2007, p.76). Knowing, being, and doing is an interrelated process which influences the leaders thinking and behavior. Knowing i...
Pierce, Jon L. and John W. Newstrom (2011) 6th edition. Leaders and the Leadership Process.
...rming relationships with employees was made clear by being efficient and fair to preserve and inspire their workforce. These results can be further studied in a dissertation that is duplicated in a different culture to test the consistency of its findings. Using the information from these two studies, it is clear that transformational leaders behaviors have an impact on their follower’s perception (Bacha and Walker, 2012; Cho and Dansereau, 2010).
My impression of leadership is the ability to motivate, inspire, set a visualization, connect, and lead by example. To become a successful leader you have to be able to convince your followers that you are trustworthy of being followed. During this semester, we have learned many, if not all of the major leadership theories and how they play a role in our everyday lives. But personally, a few of these leadership models caught me and intrigued me the whole semester so much that this paper is going to predominately be referenced about them. For example, the proposed framework that organizes leadership theories based on each theory 's focus and approach. Focus is referred to as whether or not leadership is viewed as a set of traits or actions.
Transformational leadership consists of few components which are idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, individualized consideration, management by exception and contingent rewards (Ahmad et al.,
LMX Theory organizes followers into groups defined by access to the leader. In some ways, it is like a target with the leader as the center and each concentric circle signifying groups of followers, each with less intimacy with the leader. LMX Theory components are: the leader, the inner circle, the in-group, the out-group, and strangers (Scandura and Schriesheim, 1994). As one gets close to the leader, he/she has more access to the leader and the leader has more influence in the life of the follower. LMX theory follows Jesus’ discipleship model very closely.
The book discusses that transformational leadership theory as “similar to charismatic leaders, but they are distinguished by their special ability to bring about innovation and change by recognizing followers’ needs and concerns, providing meaning, challenging people to look at old problems in new ways, and acting as role models for the new values and behaviors.” (Daft, 2015). Another definition of Transformational Leadership Theory is “Transformational leadership emphasises satisfying basic needs and meeting higher
Organizational justice and motivational theories, like the equity theory, may be used to attain this (Greenberg, J., 2013). Since GM seeks to make their employees speak up, it may come up with a system where those who speak up will not only be recognized, but will also be rewarded with both tangible and intangible incentives. A review of how the leadership is in GM can also help address its problems. The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership focuses on the dynamic relationship between supervisors and subordinates (Clemens, E. V., Milsom, A., & Cashwell, C. S., 2009).
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
In organizations aspiring for growth and continual improvement, relationships are more intricate and alternatives more numerous than the either/or imposition implied by the notion of leaders and followers. Practically no one leads all of the time. Leaders also work as followers; all in all, “everyone uses a portion of their day following and another portion leading” (Galie and Bopst, 2006, p. 11).
According to Yoder-Wise (2015), a leader can be defined as, “an individual who works with others to develop a clear vision of the preferred future and to make that vision happen” (p 35). As employees, we often have our own ideal of a good leader, which may be influenced by experiences and perception of workplace norms. While one’s opinion of an effective leader may vary, there are several recognized leadership theories. The following will focus on the transformational leadership approach.
After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggests leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each person.
When considering the term management, there has always been a common miss conception that this automatically makes an individual a leader. Leadership is only a single element of the management role. Many times managers are more comfortable utilizing a particular leadership style. While this may work well the majority of the time, certain employees or situations may require a different approach. Good leadership requires that the individual recognize the need for change to motivate their employees to accomplish the task at hand or to reach common goals. Understanding the importance of leadership is essential. However, the key element to focus on is what steps can be taken to improve one’s leadership capabilities. For many individuals this may be a difficult question to answer and may only be possible through self-assessment and reflection.
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Questionnaire Madhvi Jayarao Leaders- 481, Northwestern University April 24, 2015 Questionnaire Results The leader-member exchange (LMX) theory conceptualizes leadership as a process that is centered on the interactions between leaders and followers (Northouse, 2016, p 137). It is not uncommon for leaders to have varying relationships with team members and therefore, not treat all team members equally. There are those team members that they have developed strong relationships because the leader trusts them and the team members have worked hard for them and are reliable. The leader highly values these team members and offers more opportunities and challenges because they belong to the
The following review presents a discussion of five articles related to leadership. This discussion will identify themes shared by the five articles followed by a presentation of the author’s recommendations for applications of the concepts presented in the articles.