School Dress Code

Bates, Laura. "How School Dress Codes Shame Girls and Perpetuate Rape Culture." Time. Time, 22 May 2015. Web. 18 Feb. 2016. In this article, Bates argues that today’s school dress codes are sexist and leave a lasting impression on young girls. Bates explains that there are several cases where girls are being punished for their adolescent bodies being distractions to boys. Also, it can teach a young girl that her body is dangerous and that a young boy automatically has the right to sexually diminish and harass adolescent girls in schools. This thought process is what causes a stigma later in college, declaring that when someone is sexually assaulted on campus, the person was asking for it. This can be detrimental to a young girl, and can even
"Dress Code!" MasterFILE Complete. Educational Leadership, Dec.-Jan. 2014-2015. Web. 18 Feb. 2016. This article comes from the point of view of a school principal Thomas R. Hoerr. Hoerr starts of with a comment that was made to him about a young girl and what she was wearing. The comment referred to her undergarments. The author continues to explain the two points he learned, and because of those points, he made his school a casual place. The dress code he established only proclaims to be “neat and clean.” The author saw no problem until the attire came so close as to be dressing at the beach, so he conducted a meeting with his staff and decided something should be said. When the author wrote the work dress guidelines, he got the input of the teachers and what should be expected by each guideline. However, the author only sent out the draft to people who had worked with him for fifteen or more years, so the question arose that the world is changing and he needed opinions from younger teachers. When he received feedback, he was questioned on if some codes really made a difference, and he made some changes. Next Hoerr tells his readers that when they give a restriction on something, they must have a rational reason why. Hoerr’s reason was that the school staff needed to have a professional experience, which make since because some students might not take their teacher seriously if he or she is dressed for bed. This article uses logos by appealing to logic on
"Can Teachers Really Wear That to School? Religious Garb in Public Classrooms." Taylor & Francis. N.p., 08 Aug. 2010. Web. 18 Feb. 2016. In this article, there is a deliberation of the first amendment in context with dress codes for teachers. Kiracofe explains that codes back in 1901 were much stricter than today’s dress codes. Males could only wear suspenders and a suit coat, and women were required to wear two petticoats and dresses two inches above the ankle. Then the author addresses dress codes in regards to religion explaining how some world religions require clothing to cover every inch of their body. Kiracofe tells the readers how the First Amendment contains two religion clauses, the first The Establishment Clause and the second being The Free Exercise Clause. The author goes on to explain that employers can deny religious dress to employees if the attire would threaten the health of employees or the employer. Also, if an employee is required by religious beliefs to wear a skirt, the manufacturing company could be required the female worker to wear pants. Ethos is used in this paper by appealing to authority and credibility when it uses the first amendment. Even though this article contains information other than dress codes in schools, it still provides a lot of reliable facts and statistics that could be very helpful in an academic research