Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Reflect on the development of own communication skills, noting areas for improvement
Leadership theories and principles
Personal experience about communication skills
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
before the last minute. Chess works the same way; you are not only working on your current move, but trying to set your opponent up by thinking several moves ahead as well. A good grappling competitor does the same thing; you are probably not going to catch a seasoned opponent on your first technique; you have to be able to “foresee” to set them up and catch them on the second or third technique.
Chapter 6: Problem Solving for Verbal De-escalation
To effectively communicate with our clients during de-escalation we need to uncover what they need. We already know what we need and that is cooperation from the client. In addition, we need to ask ourselves why the client is escalated today, but was not escalated yesterday. This information
…show more content…
This can show the client you not only have an interest in them, but are really trying to “understand” their situation. This could be a past experience of your own or maybe someone you knew closely. Not all environments will allow for you to do this, because maybe there is a policy about sharing personal events/information. Either way use “caution” not to release too much personal information. Also, make sure the facts you do share do not make you look too bad. We want the client to know we are human and that we make mistakes, but we are not necessarily of bad moral fiber. For example, telling the client you had a rough childhood and made some bad choices, is not the same as telling the client you robbed banks for years without ever getting arrested. Remember, most of us are still in some kind of position of authority. Lastly, if you are going to tell a story about your past experience, make sure the attention stays on them and not you. I am notorious for not doing this with my older grappling students. They tell me about a muscle ache or minor injury they are experiencing from grappling and before they are even finished I start telling them about all my physical ailments from grappling so long. In my defense the old time judo competitors refer to judo as the great “crippling” …show more content…
A top/down management philosophy/pyramid is not the best way to accomplish your goals as a leader. It is harder for information to flow upward. Also, if you remove the larger bottom portion of the pyramid your organization cannot function. For example, in a prison the “guards” make up the larger portion of the pyramid. We cannot operate a prison without them. However, we could possibly operate the prison in an emergency without top management or the very top level of the pyramid. We must “tap” the largest portion of the workforce for “innovative” ideas on getting better at verbal de-escalation. Top level leaders cannot achieve good strategic leadership without this valuable input either. Leaders need information of all types to help make informed decisions. Let me give you another example. As a prison investigator you need officers/guards to bring you information to be
Management does not communicate with the workers, so they cannot discuss problems that are accruing, and possible solutions that may help the business run smoother. You can see this at Carson’s, the study mentioned that employees had no say in important decisions and were even afraid to address concerns to management. The study also mentioned that employees were not given proper constructive criticism. Instead of management teaching employee’s better ways to handle tasks, they would get upset and punish their employees. This is another aspect to an Exploitative Authoritative structure. According to text, all rewards are given to management. Instead of rewarding good things that their employees do, management punishes and threatens. After looking at the Exploitative Authoritative System that was used to run the Carson’s location, it is easy to see how and why the employees are
In retrospect, the decision to place the top people on the best opportunities resulted in several of the companies failing. I think with quarterly or yearly deadlines looming, leaders may be forced to reshuffle the deck, placing their top people on the biggest problems in an effort to finish strong. Whereas this may result in a short term “fix” you are neglecting the future of an organization by having your most valuable resources working on the wrong
Top-level managers in bureaucratic organizational structures exercise a great deal of control over organizational strategy decisions, which is ideal for business owners with a command and control style. As for the disadvantages, bureaucratic structures can discourage creativity and innovation throughout the organization. No matter how ingenious a business owner is, it is virtually impossible for a single individual to generate the range of strategic ideas possible in a large, interdisciplinary
The one skill that I used more of was empathy; I wanted the client to know that I understood her situation as well her feelings. At the end of our conversation, I summarized everything that we talked about, especially her want to open up to her parents and express herself to them. She mentioned that she wants them to fell empathy towards her, because the lack of parental empathy that she felt when she was younger, has even affected her in her adult life (Kilpatrick,2005).
of what I would experience as a client, unsure of how I would react or what I would disclose
The success of the organization depends on how the leaders utilize their management and leadership skills in the organization. Mission, vision and core values of the organization are posted everywhere in the organization to remind every stakeholder about their accountability and responsibility in accordance to the corporate goals. This can’t be effective without successful leadership approach. Effective leader must know how, when and where to communicate the shared vision of the organization to its stakeholders. The goal is to align personal values with the corporate values to reach optimum level of satisfaction towards the work, and the company expectations to its stakeholders. Ineffective leaders are not capable of employing this. They are not capable of employing management by objective or the ability of the managers to align the objective of the all the units and departments of the organization into the organizational goals and values. MBO starts with setting organizational objectives, followed by cascading objectives down to employees-cascading objectives down to employees requires adoption of SMART approach to ensure that goals are attainable and accountable (Mindtools, 2014)
The last episode of conflict is conflict aftermath. At this stage if the issues listed in the latent conflict episode are dealt with in a satisfactory manner, the conflict will be resolved (Stojkovic et al, 2008). This is the type of resolution that managers and supervisors should seek in order to keep organizational conflict to a minimum. However, if the conflicts listed above are not addressed and only suppressed, then the conflict will resurface and the organization will enter the stage of conflict aftermath (Stojkovic et al, 2008). The problem with this episode is that it could become serious and weaken the relationship between two parties and will never be repaired fully. For example, in prisons, if the conditions listed in the latent conflict are never resolved the conflict will worsen until another disturbance occurs (Stojkovic et al, 2008)
Organizations need strong leadership and strong management to challenge the status quo, create visions of the future and inspire/motivate members.
I agree to a certain aspect to this ideology. Without a doubt, without the proper information, the manager is useless because they are not able to direct their workers in the right direction. People working for the manager tend to require more information from the top. More important, they need a general and, sometimes, a specific sense of direction and support. Without a proper direction, all people involved will concurrently feel underutilized, and will try to gather all information, relevant or irrelevant and fill up their work time, without achieving any goals.
Leadership, managers, and power all have a vital role in organizational management. Utilizing these three concepts can assist business with the proper utilization of organizational management as well as the success of the company. This discussion board will focus on the three concepts of leadership, importance of managers, and power, as well as the biblical aspects of each, and how they are important to the success of a business.
Usually, the belief is that the managers, administrators, presidents or even the supervisors, have the greatest source of power, because they are at the top of the ladder in the hierarchy of the organization. The reality is that they need
Pinnacle leaders stand out from everyone else. Leadership at this high level lifts the entire organization and creates an environment that benefits everyone in it, contributing to their success. Level 5 leaders often possess an influence that transcends the organization and the industry the leader works in. For example, Steve jobs was a productive leader because he made sure the people around him were productive, and they respected and followed him because of his legacy.
The Industrial Revolution brought with it a new form of class distinction; society did away with feudal lords, vassals, guild-masters, and serfs to embrace that of the bourgeoisie proletariat relationship. The bourgeoisie class, consisting of the modern capitalists, are the employers of wage laborers and owners of the means of production. The proletariat class is the much less fortunate modern wage-laborer; they do not have their own means of production and therefore must sell their labor in order to survive. Karl Marx expresses these ideas in the “Communist Manifesto” along with the theory of proletariat redemption and across the board equality. Orestes Brownson and Henry Ward Beecher, also writers of the time, express views that coincide with Marx’s concepts and ideas. The Industrial Revolution, birth of new class distinction, and the consequential societal norms framed Rebecca Harding Davis’ short story “Life in the Iron-Mills”.
An organization is often viewed as systems and management is often defined as human action that facilitate any organization , in other words management is said to be a distinct process that comprises of planning , organizing , actuating and controlling. It is practiced in order to accomplish pre determined objectives. (George R. Terry) Leadership is another facet that accelerates the further process of management , it is one of the key components of direction which is further termed as an asset required for successful management of an organization. Management and leadership are two different notions that are interchangeable but having different approaches with a similar outlooks. Management as a whole is a process that is having main focus on completion of task efficiently at minimal cost. The main aim of a management is to direct all the activities related to an organization towards accomplishment of targeted goals. On the flip side leadership is said to be more directed towards vision and inspiration, it is often regarded as an influential process in an organization that is carried on by an individual which has a focus on achieving the targeted goal that is recognized and benchmarked by the management. In today’s 21st century both effective mangers as well as efficient leader play a vital role.
The counseling session began with the introductions where I introduced myself as the counselor and later introduced my client. This stage is important in any counseling session since it is the time of exploration and focusing according to Gerard Egan as quoted by Wright (1998) in his essay on couselling skills. It is in this session that I was able to establish rapport and trust with my client in order to come up with a working and fruitful relationship with him. During this stage I made use of skills like questioning, where I would pose a question directly to my client, sometimes I would choose to just listen to what the client wanted to speak out while in some instances I would be forced to paraphrase the question if I felt the client did not understand the question I had asked previously. There were also other times when I would reflect through silence. During such a period, I got time to study the client and the information he had given. This being a difficult area, since some clients may not be able to volunteer information to you as the counselor, I decided to assure the client of confidentiality of any information he was willing to share with me with a few exceptions which I also told him about. Being open to him about the only times the information may not be confidential was part of my building rapport and establishing trust with him. I therefore, decided to ask the client what information he wanted to share with me and lucky enough he was ready to speak to me about different issues that he was going through.