Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Issues of ethics within the workplace
Importance of ethical decision making
Bribery and ethics in business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Issues of ethics within the workplace
The ethical dilemma that Sarah finds herself engulfed in has many different ethical solutions depending on which ethical theory is being applied. I believe that a great ethical theory to apply in this certain situation would be Joseph Fletcher’s situational ethics. Fletcher states that “we must let go of the crutches of a system” and look at the specific situation being dealt with. He believes that the only unbreakable principle is love and that all other principles are merely guidelines. Therefore, I believe that Fletcher would advise Sarah to lie on her resume in order to keep her job. Fletcher believes that “it is better to sin bravely than to be too prideful or to hide behind systems.” No matter how her decision may affect her co-workers or …show more content…
Previously, I had no knowledge of any ethical theories and therefore had a hard time justifying why Sarah should lie on her resume. Instead, I had a “gut feeling” that it was best for her to lie and I justified that by saying that since everybody in her company already agreed to lie on their resumes, the system is corrupt and there is no problem with Sarah lying on hers. Having no sense of what morality and ethics truly is, I was unable to fully understand Sarah’s dilemma and rather acted on instinct instead of carefully examining the situation. I still agree with my logic that if she lies on her resume, the worst possible outcome for her would be getting sent back to her home country. Even though my advice for Sarah to lie on her resume remained the same, I now have an ethical justification to back up why she should. By a good base understanding of ethics, I feel that my argument is much stronger now than it was at the beginning of the semester. Therefore, if I were to be presented with a counterargument, I would be able to defend my opinion and use what I have learned from our readings to do
The ethical dilemma is whether Mark Solomon, a human resource specialist, should hire Lupe Garza knowing that her real name and identity is Carmen Mendoza. If Mark hires her knowing she is using a false identity, this could result in serious consequences for himself, his employer, and also Lupe and her family.
Richard Gunderman asks the question, "Isn 't there something inherently wrong with lying, and “in his article” Is Lying Bad for Us?" Similarly, Stephanie Ericsson states, "Sure I lie, but it doesn 't hurt anything. Or does it?" in her essay, "The Ways We Lie.” Both Gunderman and Ericsson hold strong opinions in regards to lying and they appeal to their audience by incorporating personal experiences as well as references to answer the questions that so many long to confirm.
The major true ethical dilemma in this case is whether the human resource specialist should hire Garza permanently knowing she is an illegal worker or deny Garza the position. An additional ethical dilemma is presented to Mark, after the interview with Garza. Mark is faced with the decision whether the plant should continue to employ temporary Hispanic workers knowing that they may be an illegal or stop hiring these employees.
False Information: This is probably the most obvious as to why it has negative ethical implications and a hard topic to defend
Gomes and Grant are not the only two employees that have faced an ethical issue in the workplace, employees in numerous different organizations encounter similar dilemmas. However, they should all consider the consequences that will follow if they choose to act unethically. Rather, employees should possess and abide by a code of ethics so as not to potentially put their reputation and future in danger along with that of the organizations they work for.
She lies to the bank so she doesn’t get charged with “$60 in overdraft fees”, out-and-out lie. She does not tell the truth to her husband about her day so he does not “[keel] over,” white lie. She lies to her clients so that she does not get fired for telling the truth about the reason she is late. She lies to her friends so that her friend’s feelings do not get hurt, (Ericsson 181).All of these are justifiable because of the intent. There are consequences to telling the truth in these cases and thus Ericsson needs to lie to avoid the
Lying is an issue that has been debated on for a long time. Some people believe that lying is sometimes ok in certain circumstances. Some people believe lying is always acceptable. In contrast, some believe lying is always bad. Keeping all other’s opinions in mind, I believe that lying is a deficient way of solving problems and is a bad thing. I claim that only certain situations allow the usage of lies and that otherwise, lying is bad. Dishonesty is bad because it makes it harder to serve justice, harms the liar individually, and messes up records. Furthermore, it should only be said to protect someone from grave danger.
Pfeiffer, R., & Forsberg, R. (2005). Ethics on the job: cases and strategies (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Abortion has been a political, social, and personal topic for many years now. The woman’s right to choose has become a law that is still debated, argued and fought over, even though it has been passed. This paper will examine a specific example where abortion is encouraged, identify the Christian world views beliefs and resolution as well as the consequences of such, and compare them with another option.
The first solution to this issue could be for Charlie Davis to lie for Alex Adams. In result to this solution, they would both keep their jobs as well as their friendship. If they pursue this solution, there is always the chance of Keller finding out the truth or Charlie Davis would have to live with the guilt of lying to his boss for as long as he works there. In this solution, altruism is upheld, while it violates role duty, veracity and lawfulness. Altruism is upheld in the solution because Davis his putting his friend first, regardless if it puts himself in harm’s way. It violates role duty because Adams’ did not do as he was supposed to then pushing Davis to follow suit by lying. Veracity is violated because he is not telling the truth and lawfulness is also violated because he is not obeying the law to not
One day while doing his job, a physician used a used swab that was possibly infected with HIV on another patient. When looked at by certain people, the doctor did the correct thing by telling his patient that he roused a swab on him/her. However, the chances of this patient getting HIV was substantially low, and he should have waited for the patient to develop symptoms, which would have been rare, before telling the truth. As stated by Michael Greenberg, “he might have done better by keeping his mouth shut.” If the doctor did lie, he could have lied to protect himself, the quality of life of the patient, and his ability to help others with their lives. If he had not told the patient that he used the swab on him/her, he/she would not have had to live in fear of getting HIV. Because of this decision of truth telling, the doctor lost his job, money, confidence, and also affected someone’s quality of life.
Actions are either classified as right or wrong with no allowance for a gray area. Furthermore, the strict guidelines tend to conflict with commonly accepted actions. For example, lying is always considered morally wrong--even a “white lie.” Therefore, one must not lie even if it does more good. In our society although individuals accept lying as being morally wrong, “white lies” have become an exception.
The ethical case is that there is a perfectly good worker who needs money more than most that is trying to work illegally. There are a lot of people who are stakeholders in this situation. There are other workers who established a relationship with Carmen as well as people within the community. The biggest stakeholders are Carmen’s kids, they didn’t ask to be born and the life they have isn’t their fault. The second biggest stakeholders are the human resources management team. It may not be obvious, but people can get into a lot of trouble for hiring an illegal immigrant. In fact, I’m reasonably certain that by not immediately calling the police Mark is already breaking the law.
Everyone in this world has experienced an ethical dilemma in different situations and this may arise between one or more individuals. Ethical dilemma is a situation where people have to make complex decisions and are influenced based on personal interest, social environment or norms, and religious beliefs (“Strategic Leadership”, n.d.). The leaders and managers in the company should set guidelines to ensure employees are aware and have a better chance to solve and make ethical decisions. Employees are also responsible in understanding their ethical obligations in order to maintain a positive work environment. The purpose of this case study is to identify the dilemma and analyze different decisions to find ways on how a person should act
In chapters three and four of A Short History of Ethics, Alastair MacIntyre makes a clear distinction between two philosophical doctrines at loggerheads: the Sophists and Socrates. The Sophistic amalgam of personal success, lust and power is constantly interrogated by an interlocutor in an endless plight to reveal Sophistic ignorance, fruitless desires and the right to universal justice. MacIntyre identifies the codes of both parties, and further complements the debate with historic examples to conclude the social success (or lack thereof) and persuasion of both sides.