Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Creative writing about a soldier in war
Narrative about war experience
Redeployment by phil klay: analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Creative writing about a soldier in war
When we first discussed about what would convey the essence of the book Redeployment we first thought of covering a mannequin with objects and quotes that were essential to the book. We later realized it wouldn't fully capture all of the stories of the troops the were described in the book so we decided to abandon the idea of the mannequin head and instead use a military uniform because it would represent the main focal point of the book which was the troops. We then thought of how we would be able to convey the different views and thoughts of the troops. So we decide to choose quotes from different characters from the book to represent their thoughts. We also placed words on the uniform that were commonly brought up in the book which were …show more content…
their hardships when they returned back from war. Our object fully represents the important aspect of the book Redeployment by Phil klay because it incorporates all the main themes that were apart of the book, which was their lives after war. It shown when Klay states “You don’t see or hear like you used to”. We incorporated quotes to show what they thought like when klay states “ I’ve gotten a lot of Thank You For Your Service handshakes, but nobody really knew what that service meant”. Our object represent what the troops are thinking when they come back and the words show how they would struggle to make sense of everyday life beauce of how war has altered them. Redeployment by Phil Klay was a mediocre book not an outstanding book.
The Books flaws where the change in perspectives. It never had one main character it would change from character to character and it would cause a change in the story which wasn’t a trait I liked. But my favorite part of the book was the humor and the description of the life of a veteran after the war. I expected the book to be lenient on combat experiences, but I surprised when that wasn’t the case. It was full of humor. There was never a dull moment in the book it was constantly filled with edgy jokes that constantly made me lose my breath. But the humor wasn't all that was good with the book. The description of life after the war was another trait of the book I found phenomenal.In the twelve stories he describes the challenging task of coming back home because of strained relationship they come back to because of the time they had been separated and the disconnect of troops and citizens.Phil Klay states that “when you get back to the States no civilians will be able to understand what you've gone through?'”. But the part I resonated most with the book was the humor. The humor in the book is not for everyone. Some may not find it as hilarious as I do. An example of the humor is when Klay says “ Harvey asked how he knew what santa’s assshole tasted like and mac said. Yo, son. You signed your enlistment papers. Don't act like you ain't have a taste.”. I don't expect everyone to find it as hilarious as I
do, but it was my favorite part of the book.
Based on true story, Lieutenant Phillip Caputo and his experience of the Vietnam War. During this era there was a rebalance act within the young adults community in America, they did not want to live the boring and peaceful life their parents lived. This generation of young adults got fixated on the stories and heroes that came from the WWII and what they can do to experience this “trill” first hand. The novel is written with Lieutenant Phillip Caputo in mind starting when he first enrolled in the Marine Corps at the age of 20 in hopes of chasing his fixated dream of the war. At first Phillip had this elusion that the war would only last a couple of months and that he’ll be the American hero everyone talked about. Then the slap to the face
what kinda sucked about it is that they dragged out to the end. which made you know what's going to happen when ending came. that's why it was so dull cause I was on the last page and Sam still hasn't been killed yet so I knew right away what was going to happen. Recommendations: I would recommend this if you want to study the sight affects of the war.
... a "lost cause." Many children grow up with the thought of one day becoming a hero; only a few can complete the feat. In my opinion, Philip Caputo is an irreprehensible character in American History who totally fit the role of a hero, and became "A LEADER OF MEN" (6) as the Marine slogan states. I believe the fact that he became mentally unstable and ended up killing innocent people is wrong, but I also believe it wasn't his fault. The war was at fault for Caputo's downfall, the war was at fault for the depletion of all the soldier's mental stability, and the war was at fault for every casualty the United States was forced to deal with. My thoughts after reading this book are that war can really take a toll on someone and war can bring out the worse in everyone.
...uage in the book was vulgar and depicted gruesome visuals and Terry made no attempt to polish these veterans’ words. This overall made the experiences of the veteran’s that much more realistic. Even though there is no order in which the stories are told, there still is a sense of cohesiveness. Each individual story is different but yet they all go along with one another due to the themes of the stories. This book was historically correct and would be recommended to anyone who is unaware of the details of the Vietnam war since the first-hand stories would provide a better insight on what was actually experienced. Wallace Terry’s purpose in writing this novel was to seek out “a representative cross section of the black combat force.”(p. XV) Terry achieved his purpose by showing his audience that black war veterans endured the same as whites and perhaps even more.
... in Afghanistan is to so many others in our history. Parnell’s writing is very engaging and even in times in the book where you are not engaged in a conflict it is still so interesting and leaves you wanting to know more. It expanded my knowledge of the Afghan war tremendously. The reference of the born citizen soldier who sheds his uniform when he gets home and never looks back makes me think of how many people I have come in contact with and even just see in the supermarket or in a restaurant have fought for my freedom. Hearing what the conditions are like in a country like Afghanistan also makes me so grateful for the freedom and life I live in America. This book was more than an eye opener for people both in support and not in support of war and I would suggest it to anyone no matter what walk of life and no matter what books they typically like to read.
...s were so long. I was just about sick of cod after I was only half way through the chapter. I feel like Greenberg could have done a better job of separating the book and make it more readable. While I really enjoyed Greenberg’s opening personal story, I did not see its purpose by the end of the book since he did not tell any more in-depth personal stories. For me personally, I did not really enjoy this book. I would not read it again.
In Tim O'Brien's story "The Things They Carried" we see how O'Brien uses symbolism in order to indirectly give us a message and help us to connect to what the soldiers are thinking and feeling. During a war soldiers tend to take with them items from home kind of as a security blanket. The items they normally take with them tend to reveal certain characteristics of their personality.
In particular, The Things They Carried depicts this consequence of war through the repetition of phrases such as “they carried” and “they would” to indicate the homogeneity among the soldiers when fighting as a collective. Additionally, it is important to note how prevalently longer sentences are incorporated within the text to suggest the plethora of items they carry in common for the war, as O’Brien elaborates, “They carried M-14s and CAR-15s and Swedish Ks and grease guns and captured AK-47s and Chi-Coms and RPGs…” (7). In this case O’Brien’s inclusion of “and” allows him to extend his sentences in order to convey how uniform the soldier’s identities have become due to the war, as they are now only responsible for carrying their necessary weapons and equipment. Another passage that suggests the soldiers’ uniformity is when O’Brien depicts their lifelessness while marching by claiming, “They marched for the sake of the march. They plodded along slowly, dumbly, leaning forward against the heat, unthinking, all blood and bone, simple grunts…but no volition, no will, because it was automatic,” (15). From this, the soldiers have become robotic due to the war, as they no longer possess any emotion or individuality among themselves and thus are no longer differentiable. In order to restore what’s left of their respective
In The Red Badge of Courage, Henry Fleming was drawn to enlist by his boyhood dreams. His highly romanticized notion of war was eclectic, borrowing from various classical and medieval sources. Nevertheless, his exalted, almost deified, conception of the life of a soldier at rest and in combat began to deflate before the even the ink had dried on his enlistment signature. Soon the army ceased to possess any personal characteristics Henry had once envisioned, becoming an unthinking, dispas...
Or the way that they all look up to the pantyhose as an almost godly relic. All the way to Norman Bowker finally realizing that courage comes from within, not from winning the Silver Star. These things, made up the soldiers attributes, made up the soldiers’ persona, made up the soldiers. But they didn’t stop at the soldier; certain items characterized all the soldiers as a collective group. It even went as far as to describe an entire group by the things all of them carried, of course, being the green berets.
Billy was not dressed as a soldier should be, lacking a helmet, an overcoat, a weapon, and boots. In fact, “He didn’t look like a soldier at all. He looked like a filthy flamingo” (33). Much like other children sent into the war, Billy was not prepared for what he would face. To other soldiers he seems laughable, a joke on the face of the entire army, but all other soldiers are as unprepared as Billy. Billy’s comical appearance acts as a symbol of his placement in the war; in other words, a scrawny, unprepared soldier is absurd during wartime.
Redeployment and Bodies are both short stories by Phil Klay that vividly illustrates the experiences of soldiers in war and on the homefront. Redeployment tells the story about a man named Sgt. Price who tells about his experiences on the battlefield and how he tries to readjust to society in America. He struggles at the end of the story when he has to put down his dog. The narrator of bodies tells the story of how he processed dead bodies in the war. The story reveals his character development and how he tells the "what really happened" to a man at the bar. Redeployment is a war story that is melancholy because it gives a glimpse of what marines go through. Similarly, Bodies is another war story that is gloomy because
The setting remains the same throughout this chapter but the scenery changes quite dramatically. From varnished wood and stripes and painted circles the scenery transforms into army cots and army issue blankets. This seems to cry out a lot of powerful emotion to the reader as the army image continues to come up, keeping a clear focus on what main be one of the main issues of the story.
...bol of their innocence, and just as she became "dangerous and was ready for the kill"(O'Brien 111), the soldiers changed to become mysterious and cynical because of the war. A piece of the love story that vanished; the dreams and futures of the soldiers. They became tainted forever with terrifying images burning through their minds. “‘What happened to her, Rat said, was what happened to all of them. You come over clean and you get dirty and then afterward it’s never the same” (O'Brien 109). The things they saw; the things they lived, they couldn't retell, for no one would believe it. Mary Ann Bell and Mark Fossie represented the relationships lost due to the war, the loved ones that had forgotten or who would never understand the changes. They represented the dreams that had changed and been lost. They were the innocence and naivety turned to disparagement.
I really liked this book because of the stories it had in it, that really helped me understand how bad these times really were, and how the treatment was horrible. I read a lot of how strict they were which was a part of my essay.