Four Fish: The Future Of The Last Wild Food By Paul Greenberg

792 Words2 Pages

Personally, I love seafood. I have had the privilege to eat the freshest of fish from both the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. I have been able to enjoy many types of fish cooked in many different ways. With that said, I was interested in Paul Greenberg’s, Four Fish: The Future of the Last Wild Food, due to my simple curiosity to what it is that has made fish so popular. Diving into the book I found that Paul Greenberg takes his readers on a journey starting from when he was just a boy and enjoyed the simple act of casting a baited-line into the water and waiting for a fish to latch onto the hook. “By the summer of 1981, I had a boat...and several thousand square miles of sea for my own use.” (3) After being hooked by Greenberg’s opening story, …show more content…

Greenberg knows that the demand for food will only increase. For that reason, he thinks that the solution to overfishing is fish farms. Although he does not support the current fish farming methods, he provides the idea that fish other than the big four should be farmed to take pressure off of the wild populations of the big four. All in all, Greenberg strongly supports wild over farmed fish and would love to find a way to repopulate the wild fish and therefore supports fish farming. He offers tilapia as an alternative to the big four because, “tilapia and tra grow extremely fast and are extremely efficient in turning feed into flesh(protein).” …show more content…

For example he is upset by the fact that nutritionists suggest that people eat fish twice a week. While it may be unsustainable, it does not mean that people should not do it. The chapters are also much too long as Greenberg sometimes strays a little too far from the point. On the flip side he sometimes does not go into enough detail. At times Greenberg repeats himself and at other times he barely even talks about a topic. Four Fish was hard for me to get into. It was not the kind of book that I could sit down and read from cover to cover. The main part that deterred me was the fact that the chapters were so long. I was just about sick of cod after I was only half way through the chapter. I feel like Greenberg could have done a better job of separating the book and make it more readable. While I really enjoyed Greenberg’s opening personal story, I did not see its purpose by the end of the book since he did not tell any more in-depth personal stories. For me personally, I did not really enjoy this book. I would not read it

Open Document