Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on "PEACE
When we are trying to attain world peace, we must first start with peace between individuals as these relationships are the building blocks of society and nations. Peace can be achieved by non-violent means or by the use of lethal force. This essay will explore notions of peace and conflict, advocating the use of non-violent means for resolving conflict. The environmental and social cost of lethal force is very high and unsustainable. Never the less, there are situations when justice requires the use of lethal force and examples of these will be discussed. The paper will conclude with the argument that ongoing life enhancing structural reform is required for the management and the prevention of future violent conflicts throughout the world.
What is peace?
Our modern understanding of peace discusses the absence of war (the Macquarie Dictionary, 1987, p.1254), which Raymond Aron, (Barash, 1991. p7), calls negative peace. The majority of people in the West would expect more from the concept of peace, as many would not have experience war first hand. We would also include the freedom to choose for ourselves, freedom to pursue our own interests, as long as no one else was hurt in the process, tolerance for one another and living in a stable society. John Galtung expands the concept of peace to include positive peace, which is the absence of ‘structural’ violence that is built into the social and cultural structure of society that denies people the right to economic opportunity, political and social equality and self-fulfilment, (Barash, 1991, p.8). Positive peace includes the active role of building social structures that are non-tyrannical and harmonious, even in the absence of war.
Laue believes that peace is a proc...
... middle of paper ...
...aige, G.D. (1996). To leap beyond yet nearer bring: From war to Peace to non violence to non killing. “Creating non violent futures”. 16th General Conference of the International Peace Research Association, July 8-12, 1996, University of Queensland, Brisbane, pp. 2-24.
Schellenberg, J.A. 1996. Conflict Resolution. State University of New York Press: Albany.
Scimecca, J.A. (1993). Theory and alternative dispute resolution. A contradiction in terms? In Sandole D.J.D. & van der Merwe H.(Eds.), Conflict resolution theory and practice, integration and application (pp211-221). Manchester University Press: Manchester.
Tidwell, A.C. (1998). Conflict resolved?: a critical assessment of conflict resolution. Pinter: London and Washington.
Tillet, G (1991). Conflict and its resolution. In Resolving conflict (chap. 1, pp 1-10) Sydney University Press : Sydney.
Wieviorka, M (2009) Chapter 1, “violence and conflict” Violence: a New Approach. Pp 9-26. SAGE: London
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) involves resolution methods and approaches that fall outside the structure of the judicial process. Despite its praise in preventing costly litigation and unpredictable outcomes when there are severe disagreements and impasses this, there have been objections to ADR in the past. Still, alternative dispute resolution has increased its comprehensive reception among the legal profession and business world, in recent times. In fact, numerous courts require applicable parties to remedy through resolution before consenting the parties' cases to be heard. In addition to the increased caseload of traditional courts, its growing popularity can be linked to the perception that ADR levies lower costs and
The way someone manages a difference can make conflict turn into a sphere of harm or a sphere of value. The sphere of harm is when differences are managed in destructive and damaging ways. Littlejohn states (2014) states, “Conflicts are managed so badly that damage is done to people, relationships, and, indeed, entire social worlds” (p. 188). If a party were to react to an indifference by using physical or verbal violence the conflict would move into the sphere of harm. On the other hand, the sphere of value is when differences are significant, but not controversial. Instead, parties value the difference, appreciate it and view it as a positive asset. The goal of conflict is to move from the sphere of harm to the sphere of
Pruitt, Dean G, and Sung Hee Kim. Social Conflict: Escalation, Stalemate, and Settlement. 3rd ed. 2004. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2004.
Conerly (2004), further states two things attribute to the way conflict is managed. One is the importance of meeting your own goals and the other is the importance you attribute to relationships and wanting to get along with others.
Abolishing War? An appeal to Christian Leaders and Theologians is on the pro side of the abolishing war argument. The document argues that we need to find a non-violent alternative to war. It uses the “teaching of Jesus Christ which summons Christians to renounce war and to seek with the wider and religious and human communities to develop alternatives to protect the innocent, to restrain, to restrain aggressors and to overcome injustice”. This specific article
Violence has been recorded down in our history from the dawn of time; it seems that in the past, violence was the answer for all disputes. Though time has progressed, “violence has been in decline … and today we are probably living in the most peaceful moment of our species’ time on earth” (Pinker). This decline in violence helps illustrate that mankind has been able to change, by dealing with conflicts in a peaceful manner, for violence is now not the first option to deal with issues. This turnaround also shows an evolution in mankind’s thinking process and ethics. Mankind now has understood value in living; thus, this has allowed for peace to play an integral part in society’s culture today.
Abigail, R. A., & Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing conflict through communication. 4th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
M. E. McGuinness (Eds.), Words Over War: Mediation and Arbitration to Prevent Deadly Conflict (pp. 293-320). New York: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Some people believe that the use of violence is the best way of achieving substantial change. I argue that non-violence is the key to achieve lasting change, because some of the greatest acts of non-violence have led to changes which have not changed and have transformed the lives of many people. However, I understand that violence may have to be used in certain circumstances.
the change for a peaceful future. In today's society violence is saturating the minds of
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management: Reflections and update. . Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 13(3), 265-274.
DuNann Winter, D., & Leighton, D. C. (2001 ). Structural Violence . Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st. New York : Prentice-Hall.
‘A dispute is a problem to be solved, together, rather than a combat to be won.’
(Asawo, 2011). Conflict can occur in any setting and as leaders in organizations guide and