Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of martin luther king jr
Malcolm X and the civil rights movement
Malcolm X and the civil rights movement
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of martin luther king jr
Some people believe that the use of violence is the best way of achieving substantial change. I argue that non-violence is the key to achieve lasting change, because some of the greatest acts of non-violence have led to changes which have not changed and have transformed the lives of many people. However, I understand that violence may have to be used in certain circumstances. Some figures who thought that change can be achieve through using violence and violent methods were Malcolm X, Camilo Torres and Nelson Mandela. Violence and violent protests only make things bigger, more complicated and only cause more violence. People use violence, because they believe it is required to achieve such change. Furthermore, some point out the fact that violence is used due to non-violence taking too long to cause change. Malcolm X was an African-American activist who violently protested. He used violence to fight for the rights and freedom of all Black Americans. Although he wanted the same changes as Martin Luther King, he was not remembered the same as him. Malcolm X was an Islamic ex-convict who believed in racial separatism. Racial segregation is where Black Americans live separately from White Americans in the United States of America. X also believed in gaining freedom and rights ‘by any means necessary’. Malcolm X was assassinated on the 21st of February 1965, aged 39 by three members of the ‘Nation of Islam’ after X left this group after being disillusioned by their radical beliefs. Camilo Torres was a Colombian socialist, teacher at the National University of Colombia and a Roman Catholic Priest. Torres was also a member of the National Liberation Army. The Nation Liberation Army is a terrorist group formed in 1963. They are respon... ... middle of paper ... ...im. He then went on to use them in his campaign against racial discrimination. On the 28th of August 1963 at a march to Washington DC for racial equality and the end of discrimination, Martin Luther King delivered his “I have a dream” speech. On October 14th 1964 Martin Luther King became the youngest man (age 35) to receive a Nobel Peace Prize for fight racial inequality through non-violence. Martin Luther King was arrested many times during his protests for civil rights, even though he was peaceful and did not retaliate to any violence towards him. Martin Luther King also protested against the Vietnam War. Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated on April 4th 1968 on the balcony of the Lorraine Motel in Memphis Tennessee. He was the first African American to be granted a national holiday and ‘Martin Luther King Jr. Day’ is celebrated the third Monday every January.
Of the people whose names are mentioned in history, some men like Thomas Edison are praised for their genius minds, while others such as Adolf Hitler are criticized for leaving a depressing legacy behind. While it is relative easy to notice the type of legacies these two men left, legacies of other men are often vague and they seem to be imbedded in gray shadows. This is how many people view the life of Malcolm X. Malcolm X during his lifetime had influenced many African Americans to step up for their rights against the injustices by the American government. One on hand, he has been criticized for his hard stances that resemble extremism, while on the other hand he has been praised him for his effort in raising the status for African Americans. The extremes in viewing his life from the modern day perspective have often come from reading his climatic speech The Ballot or the Bullet that he gave in many cities across America in 1964. When he was with the Nation of Islam, Malcolm X favored Blacks to be separated from the Whites, and during this time he strongly opposed White Supremacy. This also seems quite prevalent in his speech The Ballot or the Bullet. However, one events during the last year of his life reveal that he wanted the Blacks and the Whites to coexist as peaceful Americans.
Malcolm X was born May 19, 1925, and he was assassinated on February 21, 1965. Malcolm X was a Muslim leader and Civil Rights leader. He was born Malcolm Little to Earl Little and Louise Norton, who were both activists in the Universal Negro Improvement Association. Malcolm X was a bright student but was very bitter towards white authority figures. X quit school after a teacher said that his desire to become a lawyer was not a “realistic goal for a nigger.”
In the article, written by Cesar Chavez, an argument of whether people should react with violence or nonviolence is displayed. Chavez argues that violence is never the answer and will eventually lead to more violence. Examples of how to protest peacefully are shown to prove that it is the better solution. Chavez’s sophisticated use of juxtaposition, anecdote, and imagery appeals to the reader by showing them that nonviolence is far more powerful than violence.
The history of the United States has in it much separation or segregation due to race. For a long time our country has seen racism as a large problem and this has caused ethnic groups to be looked down upon and forced into a lifestyle of difficulties and suppression. Due to this, races, particularly African-Americans, have been forced to deal with unequal opportunity and poverty, leading to less honorable ways of getting by and also organizations that support change. Malcolm X is one strong example of an African American man who became apart of a group acted against it, uniting people to promote the advancement of colored people and change. Malcolm's thoughts towards race and civil right in the previous years were displayed in a less way to the people and "by any means necessary" perspective. After his pilgrimage in 1964 his view of civil rights had quickly changed into a more complete view of civil rights, and the peoples views towards him. No one really knows what kind of impact Malcolm X would have had on history if he had not been assassinated. His beliefs and philosophy did gain him a place in history as one of the best-known Black Nationalist Leaders. Everyone seems to have known who Malcolm X was, and he ranks high with all other Black leaders. His ideas were radical and he was very out spoken. He was a major force in the development of black history. He fought not only for his people but also for all oppressed people everywhere. He was well spoken and he laid the groundwork for the black power movement of the late l960's.
Malcolm X was an African American minister and civil rights leader. Unlike many activists of his time, he took a different approach to the movement. In his lifetime, from 1925 to 1965, he was known as an advocate for the rights of blacks, and has been named one of the greatest and most influential men in history. Early Life Malcolm was born on May 19, 1925, in Omaha, Nebraska to Louise and Earl Little. His Father, Earl, was a Baptist minister and an active member of the Universal Negro Improvement Association (founded by Marcus Garvey).
A key argument expressed within “A Force More Powerful” is that non-violent protest is an effective method to motivate social and political change. The documentary provides three case studies as historical instances where non-violent protest met high levels of success. A main purpose of the filmmakers is to investigate the non-violent aspects of popular uprisings that had been previously underestimated in terms of their contribution to a larger conflict. The instances taken as case studies are all of groups marginalised due to racial, colonial, and economic reasons. The histories of the conflicts from which arise the case studies are given only briefly, with a focus upon the groups shown to be oppressed by their respective states and governmental institutions.
Malcolm X had the ability to reach any one member of the black nation in America. This revolution was cut short on a sad day in February of 1965, when Malcolm X was assassinated. This left a void in the hearts of the people who he had touched upon in his revolt. This was where things began to get funky.
This became one of the biggest events in history and sparked the protest of African Americans. Martin Luther King Jr was asked to lead the boycott after Rosa was arrested. Martin was arrested, his home was burned, and he was subjected to personal abuse after he boycotted. In 1957 Martin Luther King Jr was elected president of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference for civil rights. He began to appear where injustice, protest, and action was present. Traveling over six million times and speaking over twenty five hundred times, Martin became a major target. He led a massive protest in Birmingham that caught attention of the entire world. During his time of protest he was arrested 20 times and assaulted at least 4 times. On August 28, 1963 he delivered his famous “I have a dream speech” in Washington D.C. to 250,000 people. He was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize at the age of 35 and he turned the prize money to the furtherance of the civil rights movement. As Martin Luther King Jr became a bigger threat, he was finally shot while standing on the balcony of a motel in Memphis. He had to travel to lead a protest and was unexpectedly killed by a white man named James Ray. Since Martin was killed by fighting for what he believed in he is now considered a martyr. To this day he is know as one of the most famous martyrs of all time. Shortly after his death, The
“Revolution is not an apple that falls when it is ripe. You have to make it fall.” It is believed that any individual who advocates or takes part in a revolution dreams to change not only the world but the ‘man’ itself. These revolutionists dream not only of transforming social structures, institutions, and the system of government but also produce a profound, radical and independent ‘man’.2 With the development of these ideologies, certain methods are partaken in achieving their desired goal. Some will seek the path of pacifism while others proponent a violent revolution when achieving these ideology. Growing up we have been taught that violence cannot solve any problems it only makes it worse. But can one claim that these violent desired to bring revolution to be unethical? If so, imagine how Cuba would be like if it wasn’t for the 26th of July Movement; how colored people would be treated without Malcolm X’s attitude toward racism.
Malcolm X was known to be one of the most influential Muslim Activist throughout the 1950’s and 60’s. Much Like MArtin Luther King Jr. He championed the civil rights for all African Americans across the world, specifically those of muslim faith. However unlike MArtin Luther King Jr.s NOn Violent movement, Malcolm X told his supporters to defend themselves, “By any means necessary”. BOrn in the early 1920’s Malcolm was introduced into the life of discrimination from a young age. At age Six his father was killed by a KLU KLUX KLAN like group, and was eventually put in foster care. Before starting high school, he Left to begin a life of crime. Being in his early 20’s Malcolm was sentenced to 6 years in prison for burglary, and there he met Elijah Muhammad, Leader of an All
Malcolm X was a freedom fighter like Dr. King who fought for the right and freedoms for black Americans. Unlike Malcolm, Dr. King called black Americans blacks while Malcolm called them Negros. Malcolm used violence in his fight for freedom when he said, “Revolution was based upon bloodshed”. Malcolm was ready for anything as far as blacks will gain the respect and freedom they needed. In Malcolm’s black revolution, he made it clear how blacks were treated differently no matter their age, what school they came out of, no matter what their intellectual or professional level was, they were still recognized as a boy and were not given the respect they deserved. He also pointed out how whites made them think they had different goals and objectives.
Throughout the history of the world, there have been many fights, movements, and wars. The thing about these, though, is not all can be successful. Now, we can look back in history to all of these disputes and find that the most successful movements are missing one thing- violence. This has been shown through leaders such as Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr, and Mahatma Gandhi. Even though these great leaders live in vastly different locations, that one missing tactic helped each achieve their own goals. Non-violence as a tactic has historically been successful, but a few things are required in order to make it work. Complete submission, unity (through the leaders), and respect for their enemies are just a few things that helped them achieve their goals.
Is violence justified in order to combat oppression or is nonviolence the most effective solution? Not using brutal force is the most effective way to restrain violence. In a “long way gone: memoirs of a boy soldier” Ishmael Beah goes through a lot, as a kid he should have not needed to experience all the violence he went through.
The “tension” that nonviolent direct action creates, can become a positive force which may enable change; far better than violent direct action as, who would want to listen to a violent person? The violent person is likely to snap under pressure; however the nonviolent person can better bend to logic. In fact one of the meanings of the word violent is “of, relating to, or constituting a distortion of meaning or fact.”
Parents tell their children that violence is never the answer– they are right. Nonviolent solutions should be the automatic way to resolve issues. Civil disobedience and nonviolence are still relevant today; the Civil Rights and Black Lives Matter movements, as well as other examples throughout world history, advocate their effectiveness.