Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Transformational Leadership vs Autocratic
Autocratic leadership and its problems
Autocratic leadership and its problems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Transformational Leadership vs Autocratic
PAGE 5
An Autocratic leader is one who believes the key to leadership is being centre to all activities (Ram 2001, Mgbodile 2004, Melling and Little 2004).
This leader ship style is similar to Goleman (2002) leadership styles:
• Pacesetter
• Commanding
•
And Macbeath (2003) leadership descriptions:
• Authoritarian
•
Characters of an autocratic leader:
• Authority begins and ends with the leader
• Absence of communication with staff in decision making
• Reluctant to share power or authority with others
• Expects staff to comply
Notes
An autocratic leadership style is similar to the pacesetting and commanding styles of leadership which Goleman (2002) refers to.
Macbeath (2003) also discusses an authoritarian style, where leaders do
…show more content…
• Distributes responsibilities and encourages participation from all (Harris and Spillane, 2008).
• Highly motivating and raises moral.
• Encourages staff to take a leadership role in their own initiative (Heikka et al, 2013).
• Shares responsibility with all employees. Leadership is not the sole responsibility of the manager but is shared amongst the team (Brighouse and woods,
…show more content…
• Collaboration.
• This would be affected if used to give staff, parents and children a voice (O’sullivan, 2009).
Notes
Leithwood et al (1999) suggests that distributed leadership allows staff to become more satisfied within their role and increases professionalism, efficiency and collaborative working. Distributing leadership within the staff teams ensures that they work collaboratively.
This can be ensured by creating targeted and focused improvements.
Furthermore, by allowing staff to lead change in line with the National Improvement framework (2016), Building the Ambition (2014), How Good is our Early Learning and Childcare (2016) it will build establishments capacity for improvement in creating a high quality learning environment for children where shared vision and values are placed with great importance. Staff are highly committed to their role in supporting children and their families, the community and working collaboratively with other agencies to provide individual support.
PAGE 8
Similar leadership styles
Democratic Leadership
Situations to use Distributed leadership style in an ELCC
Introduction According to the Oxford Dictionary, a leader is defined as “the person who leads or commands a group, organization, or country” (Oxford Dictionaries, 2013). Though there is a definition for what a leader is, people still have different ideas about what a leader should be and how he or she should act. There has never been a concrete idea of what a leader is; the only thing we know is that this person is the one in charge of the unit. We look at characteristics of those people we see as leaders and use those attributes to compare other people to see if they are able to be as good as, or even better than, those aforementioned leaders. We have to keep in mind that in different situations, leaders must do different tasks which indicates the need for different qualities.
Listening to and involving children and young adult in delivering of services, and respond to their concerns.
The leader is in complete control, taking charge of everything, and holding the key to success.
Moreover, the Burke-Litwin model associates leadership with the ability to provide direction. This direction can steam from the need of change and can come from anyone in the organization in order to serve the organizational needs. The model lists “vision change; using one’s intuition, influence, persuasive and presentation skills; and rewarding people with personal praise and providing opportunities to learn new skills (Burke, 2014).”
Lewin, Leppit, and White were cautious in the conclusions the drew from this study. They noted that autocratic leadership does get results and is preferred over democratic leadership. However they observed that autocratic leadership can create tension, apathy, frustration, and dependence by the group on the leader. Further, the researchers found that some of the differences in the behaviors of the children were associated with the presence or absence of the leader. Specifically, constructive effort declined in the autocratically controlled children groups. Finally, they observed very little value in laissez-faire control ---an essentially “no-leader” approach to leadership.
The leaders take full authority and assume full responsibility. Autocratic leadership typically is negative, based on threats and punishment, but it can appear to be positive, as demonstrated by the benevolent autocrat who chooses to give some rewards to employees. Consultative leaders approach one or more employees and ask them for inputs prior to making a decision. These leaders may then choose to use or ignore the information and advice received, however.
leaders must have cultivate influence. Leaders are among the elite, he is not immune to the work done on the line, but must come together to achieve organizational goals through active participation and efforts of others(Dean,2010). Each leadership’s role guide the direction, incentive motivation, communication and coordination, we need other people willingly accept that intellectually approved unanimously in the desire of seeking simultaneous up and down with the desire.
In autocratic leadership style, the leaders take direction ship and make decision in own. They do not transfer any domination to the others.
Autocratic leadership theory is a part of the behavioural approach. In this leadership theory, leader makes all decisions and uses power to command and control the followers to achieve goal. According to Lewin(1939), “autocratic leaders are associated with high-performing groups, but that close supervision is necessary and feeling of hostility are often present” (p.173). It is incredibly efficient and tasks are completed quickly. Autocratic leadership can be beneficial when decisions need to be making quickly. For example, in emergency situation surgeon uses this theory because the patient’s situation is between life and death and there is no time to discuss with other members. Bass (2008) mentioned in the Leadership styles and theories article, “Autocratic leaders can be effective because they create good structure, and determine what needs to be done. They provide rewards for compliance, but punish disobedience” (Giltinane, 2013, p. 35-37).
Autocratic I (A1). The leader takes a decision completely at his discretion without the knowledge or consent of the team members in this style of leadership. This style of decision making is possible only in cases where there is not a lot at stake with the out come of this decision, when the employees’ decision is not exactly crucial for the outcome of the project, or when a leader thinks decision can be arrived at based on the information at hand and thinks any additional information isn’t needed from the team members to take a good and calculated decision.
The leadership style that was possessed here was autocratic leadership. Autocratic leadership involves the leader making decisions and using power to control the situation and others Kelly, P.,
Based on the review of the major theories of leadership, the researcher selected three specific leadership styles for inclusion in the current study. Two leadership styles, directive (autocratic) leadership and participative
Autocratic leaders have been described as controlling, power-orientated and closed-minded (Bass 2008). They stress obedience, loyalty and strict adherence to the rules (Bass 2008). Autocratic leaders may be disliked by their team, but this may evolve into appreciation and fondness once the positive results of their leadership become evident (Bass 2008). Although staffmay dislike autocratic leaders, they often work well under them (Bass 2008). Schoel et al (2011) found that well-liked leaders might be perceived as ineffective while disliked leaders might be perceived as
An autocratic style of leadership is also known as an authoritarian leadership style of managing. Autocratic leaders are those who believe in individual control over all and every decision. Autocratic leaders also do not believe in any inputs from group members. Leaders that practice autocratic style of leadership normally make business choices based on their own agendas and judgments and never accept recommendations from their subordinates.
In this paper I will look at the four major leadership styles, their characteristics, advantages, disadvantages, and in what situations a particular leadership style is desired. Additionally, I will look at my leadership style and how I acquired this style throughout my career.