Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal factors that influence style of leadership
Advantages and disadvantages of leadership theories
Sources of Leadership theory
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Personal factors that influence style of leadership
1. Introduction
The basic understanding of the significance of the various characteristics of leadership in one’s personality is very important for a person who aims to be successful leader. The Philosophers, Psychologists ever since over centuries had jotted down various qualities and theories based on those qualities which are the indicators of leadership. Thus the aim of this Assignment II is analyse the theoretical knowledge obtained so far in the course practically which can be best accomplished by observing real life leaders’ persona with regard to their behaviour and their take on every situation.
The leader thus taken into consideration for this purpose is Lido Anthony Lacocca. Lido Anthony Lacocca also known as Lee Lacocca is a successful business and is world widely appreciated for his engineering of Ford Mustang and Ford Mercury Cougar cars. The best of his Leadership qualities showed up when he with his efforts not only saved the drowning Chrysler Corporation from failing but also turned it into a competitive manufacturer in 1980s. He is also a great writer and not astonishingly his every book was a great hit; be it "Iacocca: An Autobiography" (co-authored with William Novak which turned out to be the best selling non-fiction hardback book of 1980s) in 1984 or be it "Talking Straight" in 1988 or the book “Where All The Leaders Have Gone” in 2007.
Lee Iacocca was born in the family of Italian immigrants in 1924. Lee Iacocca successfully finished primary school and continued his further education in university. He graduated Lehigh and later Princeton University, receiving degrees in industrial and mechanical engineering. He started his professional career at Ford Motor Company as an engineering trainee ...
... middle of paper ...
...ng tactically to dealers to make decisions in his favour. Later, dealing with crisis in Chrysler, he applied best of his potential of communication which fetched him Federally guaranteed loan. A good leader or manager need to be a good listener as well if he wants his team to work constructively. Thus recognising the need of synchronisation in interaction between the manager and his team; Iacocca established a transactional model of communication through quarterly review system which gave the follower the chance to explain the problems faced by them or the reasons for the declining performance if in case to prevent further big future failure of the company at large. The quarterly review meetings brought the shift in the authority of senior manager towards more democratic approach where manager acts like adviser or more experienced colleague (Iacocca & Novak 1984).
Throughout history, the organizational landscape has been highly competitive. Effective leadership aligned with the core corporate strategy can serve as a powerful lever to achieve success in a fast paced business environment. We have seen great leaders taking their businesses to new heights. They knew how to build great companies while treating their employees well, how to improve or change dysfunctional corporate cultures, reinvigorating tired brands and develop new strategic plans. Others proved themselves difficult to work for, stubborn and even out-of-touch. The following report analyzes the leadership of Robert Nardelli who is the chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Chrysler.
Austin Peay was a Clarksvillian who made positive contributes through his political activism and leadership. Austin Peay has accomplished a lot in his life time. He had his own law firm, was elected into the Tennessee House and was also the Governor of Tennessee.
There tend to be a variety of concepts regarding how, as well as what should undergo consideration when developing leadership in individuals. Scholars have different suggestions on the kind of approaches that should get observed during the practice. As a result, this paper seeks to unravel various forms of leadership approaches, as well as suggesting the best theory that should be in use when creating a perfect leader. Additionally, the work will establish ways of determining the effectiveness of a leadership program.
Leadership is a quality which cannot be acquired by any person from the other but it can be acquired by self-determination of a person. Leadership can best be called the personality of the very highest ability-whether in ruling, thinking, imagining, innovation, warring, or religious influencing. Leadership is practiced not so much in words a it is in attitude and in actions. Their actions leave a long lasting memory in the line of history and lead up to may events that occur today. To be a leader one will need many qualities. Leaders have a purpose and strategies to accomplish that purpose. They are driven and motivated. In the end they should be able to attain good results. These innate talents help to make up a leader that will succeed and be efficient in carrying out tasks. But, the purpose of this paper is determine what truly makes a leader successful. A successful leader should be considered more on their impact rather than their accomplishments of their organizations alone for they are not sufficient in determining the key to their success .
Leadership is a complex process with many different approaches. This is a summary of the leadership literature including the pros and cons of each approach. The trait approach implies successful leaders are born with those traits. This theory focuses on identifying certain traits that make people great leaders. Some of the major leadership traits identified in the trait approach are intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and social ability. There are many advantages to the trait approach. “First, it is intuitively appealing because it fits clearly into the popular idea that leaders are special people who are out front, leading ...
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
It is impossible to pinpoint precisely the time when interest in leadership styles emerged. However a set of experiments conducted by 3 social scientist in 1938 is a good time to begin. Kurt Lewin, Ronald Leppit, and Robert White used groups of children to study different approaches to exercising control. Their classic study identified three types of control: autocratic, democratic, and laissez faire. These three types of control came to be known as leadership styles.
Personality is one of the key aspects that must be addressed when considering what type of attribute a leader needs. Personality has two meanings. The first meaning refers to the impression a person makes on others his social reputation. It describes him or her as pushy, honest, outgoing, impulsive, decisive, friendly or independent. From the standpoint of leadership, this view of personality addresses two issues: “What kind of leader or person is this?” and “Is this somebody I would like to work for or be associated
The idea of what’s morally right and wrong changes within each culture whether an organizational culture or between individuals. However, the best leaders are the ones who do what’s right and best for the organization. During this research paper I will attempt to define the term leadership style and its concept. Moreover, I will attempt to describe three leadership styles, the development and the process one would follow to modify their leadership style. When pertaining to myself, I never saw myself as a leader but I will attempt to describe my leadership style and the advantages and disadvantage I would have in a business environment.
Leadership has been studied and defined since the beginning of times. Throughout history, the leadership theory was characterized by the idea of leaders being great men who were brave and sources of authority and Justice (Marsiglia). However, leadership theories have changed over time and new ones have been developed. Similarly, in today’s time, a leader’s leadership style is defined as the way a leader approaches action towards followers to accomplish a mission. Despite the fact that leadership styles are vital, it is concluded that the essence of leadership is actually an individual’s personality and what provides the motivation, purpose, and direction to lead efficiently towards accomplishments. Personality types are known to be important in leadership because they help a leader develop followers accordingly, make valuable and timely decisions, and have a different perspective to accomplish a job. Personality shapes leadership and therefore also leadership styles. Without personality, there would be no leadership styles. Personality types provides the base for leadership development, style, and the foundations for qualities needed for any leadership position.
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
This book emphasizes on theories of becoming a leader, it is not a “how to” book by any means. Bennis states how leaders contribute to society and how crucial they are, along with the characteristics that come along with being a leader. He provides intriguing insight about leaders and emphasizes the integrity and authenticity that such people carry. In this reading, Bennis (the author) recognizes an immense amount of traits/characteristics a leader possesses which are: maturity, curiosity, trust, passion, guiding vision, candor, self knowledge, and daring. Bennis claims that people are not born with these traits, and that people gain these traits by pushing themselves to exceed others.
“Leadership is an influence relationship among leaders and followers who intend real changes that reflect their mutual purposes” (Rost, 1931). But in today’s time, the styles of leadership are changed every time a new technology is invented or discovered so there is lack of persistency. The only thing which manages to stay constant is the principles of carrying out business activities. There are philosophies and ideologies on leadership which can be used in any time period as they are mostly a reflection of the principles of leadership. Theorists and authors like Hobbes (1679), Lewin (1947) and Aristotle (384–322 B.C.), in their time have produced enough material which can be put into use by modern day leaders and managers. Philosophers like Aristotle, who was known to be one of the most business-oriented and practical philosopher of his time, his work is still used by businesses today because of their relevance as he is interested in defining principles in terms of the ethics of leadership (Santa Clara University). In the essay I have tried to show how leadership has adapted to the changes around them and compared to the past and what circumstances caused need to change it. As a layman, anyone would think that the principles centuries ago will be very different to what we follow now but after studying on Hobbes, Lewin and Aristotle it has made a big impact on my way of thinking because the work produced by them still has more relevance compared to some of the work produced now. I have tried to explain the evolvement of leadership through three aspects which are psychology, sociology and philosophy.
This paper describes about my leadership strengths and areas for growth/future study. It also included how these qualities are used in my daily work routine, self-assessment results and a brief explanation on Individual style in leadership.
There are a lot of personality traits, different qualities and aspects that a leader needs to have within him/her, in order to be an efficient, effective and a true leader. The set of personas are in born, it is not something that develops as the time passes by. When we look around in the history, we will realize the fact that different leaders had different qualities, merits and attributes, yet, they all proved to be equally effective. Every leader however, came or comes across different circumstances where they had to lead a specific segment of the societies. For instance, a leader of political party will have different goals and targets as compared to the leader of some corporate office. However, one similarity among leaders is that they have to make decisions and those to in testing times and in quick manner, based on challenges they are up to.