Leadership has been studied and defined since the beginning of times. Throughout history, the leadership theory was characterized by the idea of leaders being great men who were brave and sources of authority and Justice (Marsiglia). However, leadership theories have changed over time and new ones have been developed. Similarly, in today’s time, a leader’s leadership style is defined as the way a leader approaches action towards followers to accomplish a mission. Despite the fact that leadership styles are vital, it is concluded that the essence of leadership is actually an individual’s personality and what provides the motivation, purpose, and direction to lead efficiently towards accomplishments. Personality types are known to be important in leadership because they help a leader develop followers accordingly, make valuable and timely decisions, and have a different perspective to accomplish a job. Personality shapes leadership and therefore also leadership styles. Without personality, there would be no leadership styles. Personality types provides the base for leadership development, style, and the foundations for qualities needed for any leadership position.
It is well known that there are many personality tests that attempt to divide individuals in certain categories, or personality types, and who are also believed to include many qualities that help shape leadership. Even though, most of these personality tests do not fully accomplish or are successful at accurately stating an individuals personality type, due to the complexity of human nature, there has to be an understanding of the importance of personality in leadership. The understanding of personality depends only on the individual’s introspection, his or her approach...
... middle of paper ...
...Followers? an Uncertainty Management-based Explanation." Why Does Leader Integrity Matter T Followers? an Uncertainty Management-based Explanation 5.2 (2009): n. pag. Web. 16 June 2014.
Mullane, Susan P. "Ethics and Leadership." Ethics and Leadership (2009): n. pag. Web. 17 June 2014.
"My MBTI Personality Type - MBTI Basics." My MBTI Personality Type - MBTI Basics. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 June 2014. .
Turner, Rebecca A. "Leadership Success: Does Personality Matter?" Leadership Success: Does Personality Matter? (n.d.): n. pag. Web. 16 June 2014.
"Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in the Teaching of Leadership Skills." Medical Education 34.11 (2000): 956. Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Web. 20 June 2014. .
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (2001). Leadership: Do traits Matter? Academy of Management Executive,5,, 48-60.
The most effective leaders know better than to try to be someone they are not. They should always be searching for opportunities to reinvest in their strengths. Leaders need to stay true to who they are and make sure they have the right people around them. The book says those who surround themselves with similar personalities are at a disadvantage to those who are secure enough to be surrounded by people who strengths will compliment theirs.
It is consistently found that personality plays an important role in Leadership and leadership styles. Leaders act and react differently in situations depending on their personality traits. It is also found that when personality affects a leader 's decision-making skills it can also directly affect their success. The Five Factor Model was created, referred to hereafter as FFM, that contains five different personality
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
The Personal Side of Leadership. (n.d) Leader’s self-insight 4.5: Personality assessment. Jung’s typology and the myers-briggs type indicator. Pages 123-124.
Understanding the strengths of a personality and communication style is a critical aspect of leadership in almost any career. Likewise, the weaknesses of that same style can ensure both great success and absolute failure in any individual’s personal and professional life. As someone who has taken multiple personality and leadership tests over the years, I was intrigued by the opportunity to participate in the Humanmetrics Jung Typology test. Aware that I have adapted to properly handle the responsibilities of both my family and career over the last twenty years, the results presented only reinforced the neutrality I have embraced for the last five years of my current job as a Director of Operations over a large restaurant
Leadership is the glue that binds any business together, identifying and understanding your type of leadership style can ultimately aid you in becoming a better leader in your professional career. A successful business cannot function without leadership therefore this is a crucial aspect of internal employee development for businesses striving to stay relevant in a crowded marketplace. In addition to recognizing your leadership style every leader needs to look to them and identify what type of personality they have. By becoming an informed business leader you will gain trust and respect of your team to guide them into the future and maximizing potential growth. Throughout this paper I will identify my leadership style and also personality type and how it has affected my personal career growth. Identifying these conclusions is extremely important in crafting company culture.
Effective Leadership course was centered on the framework for more effective leadership. The first step in the framework was to understand and accept one’s core personality profile which was based off of the modified big 5 personality model. Let me begin with the “Super 2”key traits which are Surgency and Agreeableness. These two traits are opposites on a continuum at the core personality level. Each individual fits in one of the other traits based on their level of common strengths and common shadows. A person with a Surgency personality is one who flourishes in a task oriented environment. One who is a Surgent has a take-charge attitude and is competitive while unintentionally possessing shadows of overbearing, insensitive or abrasive, with a Win-Lose mentality and a dislike of collaboration. On the opposite end of the continuum, there is an agreeable who excels in a
The basic understanding of the significance of the various characteristics of leadership in one’s personality is very important for a person who aims to be successful leader. The Philosophers, Psychologists ever since over centuries had jotted down various qualities and theories based on those qualities which are the indicators of leadership. Thus the aim of this Assignment II is analyse the theoretical knowledge obtained so far in the course practically which can be best accomplished by observing real life leaders’ persona with regard to their behaviour and their take on every situation.
Palmer, D. 2009. Business leadership: three levels of ethical analysis, Journal of Business Ethics. 88(3): 525-536.
Leadership is the combination of traits, behaviors, attitudes, values, and beliefs. Personality plays a pertinent role in the type of leadership style an individual will depict. I received the personality trait of virtuoso (ISTP). According to my results, the virtuoso loves to explore and examine his or her environment and have difficulty at keeping to one task at a time. Virtuoso’s, also, have a tendency to lend a helping hand and share their experiences in hopes that it will benefit others around them. The Virtuoso personality is very uncommon; totaling about five percent of the population. It is especially rare for females to have this personality, but those that do are predominantly classified as tomboys by the society. Most individuals with this personality are difficult to predict. They
Leadership has been described as a “complex process having multiple dimensions” (Northouse, 2013). Over the past 60 years, scholars and practitioners have introduced a vast amount of leadership models and theories to explain this complex field and examine its many perspectives. Numerous leadership theories and models have attempted to define what makes a leader effective. From the early 1900s, the trait paradigm dominated leadership literature, focusing on inherited traits of leaders and suggesting that “leaders are born, not made”. However, during the 1950s, the trait approach lost enthusiasm as focus shifted to the behavior of leaders. Similar to the trait theory, the behavioral paradigm was based on general effective leadership behaviors
Research indicates that leadership styles have a huge impact on how the world is being shaped every day. To demonstrate a clear correlation between leaders and decisions making process, Lilienfeld, Waldman, Watts, Landfield, Rubenzer, & Faschingbauer, (2012), Van, Cilliers, & van Deventer (2008), and Odom, Boyd, & Williams, (2012) developed a sample category of leadership identities based on three different concepts. Beaver et al. (2014) illustrated a high level of leadership, interpersonal traits based on a study done on 42 U.S. president’s psychopathy traits. Van Eeden, et al. (2008) focused on management leaderships and Odom, et al. (2012) presented scholar leaderships. Each article presented respectively a key theme that will be developed in this paper. The first theme is leadership styles. The second theme is leadership psychopathic traits and the third theme is the personality traits of a leader. The three themes combine appeared to unify in one concept of leadership identity, which needs to be developed by effective leaders
After understanding the theory behind both the trait and skill approach, I was eager to evaluate and reflect on my own leadership traits. It was interesting to see how the trait approach allowed me to better understand whether or not I have certain traits considered to be important for leadership, while skills approach allowed me to evaluate my strengths and weaknesses in the technical, human and conceptual skills. From completing the Leadership Trait Questionnaire (LTQ) and the Skills Inventory, I was able to reflect more on how I behave towards others in a leadership context, as well as the skills that I currently possess. As a naturally extroverted person, I have been taking on leadership roles from a young age. The findings from these two
Trait theories are theories that consider personal qualities and characteristics that differentiate leaders from nonleaders." Early results aimed at confirming this theory were inconclusive. Many research studies were conducted and each identified key traits supposed to differentiate leaders from nonleaders. The problem is that they didn't get the same results, thus failing to discover common traits, which should have shown in each research study. When applying the Big Five Personality framework (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, emotional stability and openness to experience) to the study and research of leadership traits, results were more encouraging. They showed that the most important trait for leaders was extraversion. Still, this founding sh...