Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The definition of servant leadership
Strengths and weaknesses in trait approach to leadership
Managerial Leadership - chapter 1
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The definition of servant leadership
“Leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal.” (Northhouse, 2013, P.5) This process of leadership is not a trait or characteristic that the leader possesses. It is an interactional experience between the leader and their followers. This interaction means that the leader has an effect on and is affected by their followers. Leadership is an interactive event between the leader and their followers. Followers are individuals who the leader guides towards achieving goals. They are the people the leader uses to accomplish the goals. Context is the setting in which work is performed. It could just be a normal work day or it could be a long term project. It could also be the work environment and the resources available to accomplish goals. Outcomes are the results of the leadership process. It could be reaching certain goals, developing a new product, or resolving problems in a company or organization. Leadership outcomes could also mean improving team moral or trust and respect between the leader and their followers. Leadership is a complex process with many different approaches. This is a summary of the leadership literature including the pros and cons of each approach. The trait approach implies successful leaders are born with those traits. This theory focuses on identifying certain traits that make people great leaders. Some of the major leadership traits identified in the trait approach are intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and social ability. There are many advantages to the trait approach. “First, it is intuitively appealing because it fits clearly into the popular idea that leaders are special people who are out front, leading ... ... middle of paper ... ...eption, and laissez-faire.” (Northouse, 2013, P, 214) The pros with the transformational approach are that it put importance on the significance of followers in the leadership procedure and how they want followers to achieve more and have increased job satisfaction. The cons with the transformational approach are the validity of the MLQ, and how effectively it determines good transformational leaders. Some researchers have also claimed that transformational leadership could be used in damaging ways and would be result in negative outcomes for companies and organizations. Servant leadership is an approach that goes against most leadership styles because it has the lead being the servant to their followers. This style of leadership wants the leader to be focused on the needs of their followers, empower their followers, and help realize their full capabilities.
Servant leadership is a designation coined by Robert Greenleaf in 1970 in an essay entitled The Servant as Leader. In this essay, he describes the servant leader and a servant first contrary to one who is a leader first. The difference is the servant chooses to put others needs before his own while the leader first may later become a servant from the promptings of a sense of right and wrong or simply because they are coerced in that direction (Greenleaf, 1991).
What is a servant leader? A servant leader is a individual that wants to serve first and is selfless. “The servant-leader is servant first. It begins with the natural feeling that one wants to serve, to serve first.” (Keith) A servant leader can be anyone in a group setting from a work place, education, religion and cultures. Jesus was a servant leader. He was selfless he died on the cross for our sins. He was selfless and while here on earth was always helping people and teaching the way of the lord.
Servant leadership consists of leaders helping their followers become leaders themselves. The use personal skills such as empathy, compassion and listening to help their followers succeed. It is not necessarily the most popular form of leadership but, it has been proven successful b those leaders who implement it in their work practices. Servant leaders typically have a strong bond with their team. They are the base and the foundation of their teams.
In my opinion, the trait approach is the defining leadership from the objective perspective rather than a physical or technical glance. It is the study of consistent patterns in thought, emotion, and behavior of an individual that are linked to effective leadership across various situations. Northouse’s five leadership traits are intelligence, integrity, sociability, determination and self-confidence. The trait approach provides a foundation to what a leader should look like due to it being backed back a century of research; however, there is no definite list of traits or take into account situational traits.
A servant leader is someone, regardless of level, who leads simply by meeting the needs of the team.
The leadership is a result of a combination of traits, with special emphasis on the personal qualities of the leader, which he should possess certain personality traits that would be special facilitators in leadership performance. This theory shows that leaders are born as such, there is no likelihood of 'making' them later with personal development techniques.
There are also some pros and cons of transformational leadership. Some of the pros are that it is a theory that is researched extensively. It is a theory of leadership that the general public can understand; you don’t have to be an I &O Psychologist or a human resource director to understand the principle of the theory. Some of the cons associated with transformational theory are that it can be difficult to measure the parameters. The four factors discussed earlier overlap in some regards and it can be hard to distinguish them from one another. Some think of the theory as a trait and not a behavior. If an organization is well established and set in their ways, meaning not a lot of change in the organization; then transformational theory may not work very well.
Political theorists have long debated over what the best form of political leadership is. For example, John Locke argued that the people should be the priority and that the state should work to provide for the people, whereas Thomas Hobbes believes that people should submit to absolute government. This paper will be an account of how the great political philosophers, from Socrates to Locke portray political leadership.
A Transformational leader would elevate the interests of their employees, they would generate awareness and acceptance of the goal for the group. (Bass, B. M. ,1991) An example of transformational leadership in a hypothetical situation would be if there was a monthly goal set for each individual on the team and the leader finished his goals first then went on to help the rest of the team, taking extra time to see every employee as an individual. Another situation would be if a team member had a death in the family and the leader would provide emotional support for the employee as well as rallying the rest of the team to console the team member. Napoleon declared that an army of rabbits commanded by a lion could do better than an army of lions commanded by a rabbit (Bass, B. M. ,1991). The world is full of transformational leaders but we need more. Transformational leadership can be learned, and it can and should be the subject of management training and development (Bass, B. M. ,1991). Next, we will look at Servant
Being referred to as a follower all my life forced me to think I could never be a leader or even the smallest group of people. Hearing my mom say out of her own mouth that she has often thought of me as a follower became an eye opener. Knowing that my very own mom thought of me as nothing more than a follower caused me to reevaluate some things in my life. Hearing things like “Whitney can’t lead she’s not really well at that” was hurtful as well. After a while of hearing basically that I was strong enough to lead anyone that caused me to gain motivation in that aspect of life. Since those particular incidents whether it was in class or out of class I make sure when I am given a leadership role I do my best at it. When the day comes and I am
Servant leadership is having a heart for others, to want to help in any way they can. To put other people’s needs above yours to help them develop and perform to the best of their ability. Jesus is an example of a servant leader. It states in Matthew 20:28, “Just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many”. He put our needs above his own!
How is this so?” this can be views as a true statement. Servant leadership is a theory or philosophy in which the leader considers the needs of others and affirms morals in leadership. Furthermore this leadership style may obtain favorable results by actually focusing on the needs of others. Characteristics of a servant leadership should be displayed without effort.
To be a leader there are many ways to be go about it, and depending on the situation and circumstance the type of leadership style can vary. When you think of servant leadership you may think of a typical hierarchy where employees serve and cater to the bosses. In this situation servant leadership is the opposite it is where the leader serves the people. According to an article I found it defines servant leadership as the foundation for leaders other effectively. It goes on to define servant leadership as a person’s dedication to helping others be their best selves at home, work, and in the community (Economy, 2015). Servant leaders can be described as leaders who believes every person has value, deserves civility, trust, and respect. They believe people can accomplish much when inspired by a purpose beyond themselves. There is a major difference in servant
After understanding the theory behind both the trait and skill approach, I was eager to evaluate and reflect on my own leadership traits. It was interesting to see how the trait approach allowed me to better understand whether or not I have certain traits considered to be important for leadership, while skills approach allowed me to evaluate my strengths and weaknesses in the technical, human and conceptual skills. From completing the Leadership Trait Questionnaire (LTQ) and the Skills Inventory, I was able to reflect more on how I behave towards others in a leadership context, as well as the skills that I currently possess. As a naturally extroverted person, I have been taking on leadership roles from a young age. The findings from these two
Servant Leadership means to serve others and to lead. It puts everyone else first teaching to put others before yourself, with this leading qualities emerge. Just being or having leadership qualities doesn’t always work. Most leadership models show possessive towards the better for themselves, some work out while others don’t, mostly I think because the unwillingness to see others before yourself is a hard concept for some to understand and use. You can be a great leader but if you don’t understand servant qualities or serve for the benefit of others your probley not much liked. Most I don’t think know what Servant Leadership is or means, I didn’t until this course opened it up to me.