Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Comparing and contrasting motivation theories
Comparing and contrasting motivation theories
Servant leadership compares and contrasts to other forms of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Comparing and contrasting motivation theories
Analyse how theories of motivation may be applied in the practice of leadership
Many different motivation theories have been created and dissected over the past century in an attempt to understand human behaviour and answer the question: “what creates the force needed to do things we want to do?”
Wikipedia defines motivation as, “The general desire or willingness of someone to do something.” Motivation is a need within us that inspires us to take action. In leadership, motivation theories play a key part in organisational behaviour and creating team success. It forms the centre of influence and therefore effective and inspirational leadership.
To be in a position to motivate people, it is key to understand what actually motivates them in
…show more content…
Organisations can no longer choose if they want to engage with stakeholders or not; the only decision they need to take is when and how successfully to engage.
Stakeholder engagement is relevant to any type of organisation: business, public or civil society. It is particularly important in the context of running an organisation responsibly and is integral to the concept of Corporate Responsibility.
Stakeholder engagement is crucially different from stakeholder management: stakeholder engagement implies a willingness to listen; to discuss issues of interest to stakeholders of the organisation; and, critically, the organisation has to be prepared to consider changing what it aims to achieve and how it operates, as a result of stakeholder engagement.
Successful management is the art of optimising long-term benefits for the organisation based on reconciling sometimes disparate stakeholders’ wants and needs (investors, employees, customers, suppliers
…show more content…
This is appropriate for work involving serious safety risks or with large sums of money. Bureaucratic leadership is also useful for managing employees who perform routine tasks.
This style is much less effective in teams and organisations that rely on flexibility, creativity or innovation.
Charismatic leadership
Charismatic leadership resembles transformational leadership, both types of leaders inspire and motivate their team members.
The difference lies in their intent. Leaders who rely on charisma often focus on themselves and their own ambitions, and they may not want to change anything.
This feeling of invincibility can severely damage a team or an organisation.
Servant leadership
A servant leader is someone, regardless of level, who leads simply by meeting the needs of the team.
These people often lead by example. they have high integrity and lead with generosity. Their approach can create a positive corporate culture, and it can lead to high morale among team
Within my organization there are many different stakeholders. It is crucial to first understand what a stakeholder means. A stakeholder is a person who has something to gain or lose through the outcome of planning process. Within healthcare there are three types of stakeholders, those who receive health care, those who give health care, and those who manage the financial aspects of health care. Health care organizations do not face just one or a few stakeholders they hold many. Healthcare executives must learn to manage a portfolio of stakeholder relationships.
Theories of Motivation What is the motivation for this? According to the text, motivation is defined as a set of factors that activate, direct, and maintain behavior, usually toward a certain goal. Motivation is the energy that makes us do things; this is a result of our individual needs being satisfied so that we have inspiration to complete the mission. These needs vary from person to person as everybody has their individual needs to motivate themselves.
Stakeholders are those groups or individual in society that have a direct interest in the performance and activities of business. The main stakeholders are employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, financiers and the local community. Stakeholders may not hold any formal authority over the organization, but theorists such as Professor Charles Handy believe that a firm’s best long-term interests are served by paying close attention to the needs of each of these stakeholders. The modern view is that a firm has responsibilities to all its stakeholders i.e. everyone with a legitimate interest in the company. These include shareholders, competitors, government, employees, directors, distributors, customers, sub-contractors, pressure groups and local community. Although a company’s directors owes a legal duty to the shareholders, they also have moral responsibilities to other stakeholder group’s objectives in their entirely. As a firm can’t meet all stakeholders’ objectives in their entirety, they have to compromise. A company should try to serve the needs of these groups or individuals, but whilst some needs are common, other needs conflict. By the development of this second runway, the public and stakeholders are affected in one or other way and it can be positive and negative.
Journal of Business Ethics. 23, 737 - 770. Stakeholder engagement in the field (2014). print. The. Retrieved from http://www.gapinc.com/content/csr/html/company-overview/stakeholder-engagement.html#.
Our textbook defines Stakeholders as “Individuals and organizations who are actively involved in the organization or whose interests may be positively or negatively affected as a result of what the organization does.” (Carpenter, Bauer & Erdogan, 2012, p. 191). One method of deciding who key stakeholders are, is Stakeholder Analysis or “A range of techniques or tools used to identify and understand the needs and expectations of major interests inside and outside the organization environment.” (Carpenter, Bauer, & Erdogan, 2012, p. 192). The first step in Stakeholder Analysis is identifying Stakeholders, and the first step in identifying stakeholders is to determine the influences on the mission, vision and strategy that an individual or organization may have.
A Stakeholder is anybody, be it an individual, group or business, with a vested interest in an organisation. On organisation can determine its stakeholders by considering who and what is affected by any of their business activity. Understanding who you work with and for helps to build strong relationships and ultimately, will help in achieving organisational objectives. Reputation is very important and can be very hard to achieve, but easily lost; people are more willing to listen to organisations with a strong reputation where trust and communication is effective. It’s important for organisations to understand who their stakeholders are and what their needs are as they are one of the main factors that will determine and effect whether the
According to Greenberg (1999) motivation is defined "as a process of arousing, directing and maintaining behaviour towards a goal." Where directing' refers to the selection of a particular behaviour; and maintenance' refers to the inclination to behave with consistency in that manner until the desired outcome is met.
Stakeholder engagement; in modern times, the term “stakeholder engagement” has a far wider scope and longer life span than in the past. With emphasis in the modern day being placed on; transparent reporting, good corporate social responsibility and the use of good communication techniques. Stakeholders, are no longer simply those who own portions or shares of the company. In modern times, a stakeholder is any party that can influence the actions or be influenced by the actions of
Stakeholders are individuals, groups, and organisations with the power to influence the delivery of an organisation’s strategy and thus the organisation’s performance and/or a significant interest in an organisation’s strategy and thus the organisation’s performance (Wisniewski, 2001; Ackermann & Eden, 2011). In the context of the draft BSC to be developed, however, the analysis shall focus on relatively aggregated stakeholder groups. Firstly, the aim of this stakeholder analysis is not to pinpoint individual persons as stakeholders who may then be managed more easily than large organisations, but to identify rather broad stakeholder groups interested in Zara’s performance. Secondly, addressing
Stakeholders are group of public who have a link with an organization in arrange to achieve success or in another word, anyone who is affected of affects an organization is considered to be a stakeholder. There are several types of stakeholders such as, managers, employees, owners, stockholders, loaners, Investors, customers, community, government, and suppliers. But, each type of them has dissimilar requirements.
There are many ways in which motivation can be defined. Generally speaking, motivation comprises an individual’s effort, persistence and the direction of that effort. In simple terms, it is the will to perform. (Brooks, I, 2006). Eugene Mckenna thinks that with motivation, people respond to conditions operating within and outside themselves, and go the extra mile at their role. To motivate people, elements such as needs, motives, drives and goals or incentives of individuals have to be looked at.(Mckenna, E, 2000).
Motivation is the reason or purpose behind action, or what causes one to act in a particular manner. Motivation can either be intrinsic or extrinsic in nature, yet it rests solely within the power of the individual actor to be motivated (or not) by intrinsic and extrinsic motivators. Motivation is an extremely important topic of discussion in the larger discourse on leadership. It is important because it provides the basis for human action, or inaction. Leaders must be able to understand what motivates their followers in a hope to use that knowledge to guide them to behave in a certain way that is beneficial for the organization. To do so, it behooves leaders to understand the basic concepts and theories of motivation that abound.
Stakeholders are interest of an individual or groups that directly or indirectly affected by the organisation’s activities, policies and objectives (Henry Frechette, 2010). Stakeholders can be divided as internal (managers and employees) and external (shareholders, customers, and suppliers) (BPP F9). Different stakeholders may have common interests or conflict interests with company. Company board members or management must take care about stakeholders’ interest. They can’t make the decision based on their own interest or their relation with others organisation. Conflict of interest will arise when interests of organisation act in concert with managers’ personal interests or interests of another person or organisations, (Anon, no date).
It is also the reason why the relevant stakeholders have to be involved. Stakeholders have to be involved so that communication and impacts of results are increased. Engaging stakeholders in the environmental management process make sure that there is transparency in the whole process because there is an additional appraisal that is involved. Potential controversies may be anticipated in a situation where the characteristics and nature of various stakeholders have been identified, categorized and understood. Stakeholders should be involved because they provide a practical understanding of definitions which are crucial for inclusion criteria. Issues have arisen in the whole participation process and such may be weighed or cost-benefit analysis is done to find out whether it is worthwhile. Finding the right people, time, balancing multiple inputs, training and resources are some of the challenges of the participation process. Time and resources are regarded as tradeoffs that have to be balanced against the benefits that are derived from stakeholder involvement or else
According to Greenberg (1999), motivation is defined “as a process of arousing, directing and maintaining behavior towards a goal.” Where “directing” refers to the selection of a particular behavior; and ‘maintenance” refers to the inclination to behave with consistency in that manner until the desired outcome is met.