Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is the meaning of leadership
Application of trait theory of leadership.view essay
What is the meaning of leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is the meaning of leadership
‘Leadership’ and ‘Management’ are two commonly using words in nowadays organizations. The essential and integral part of productive management is leadership. Effective leadership is crucial to an organization’s success. Leaders can take a quantity of different steps to help keep projects from failing. The main and highly important focus of the leader is to make things happen. According to Griffin (2008), ‘Leadership, as a process, the use of non coercive influence to shape the group’s or organization’s goals, motivate behaviour toward the achievement of those goals, and help define group or organizational culture; as a property, the set of characteristics attributed to individuals who are perceived to be leaders’. Equally as management, that …show more content…
Trait theory based on research that was focused on identifying specific physical characteristics as well as personal attributes that may be associated with leader effectiveness. Stogdill (1974) analyzed and synthesized 287 studies on leadership traits conducted between 1904 and 1970 and identified several characteristics associated with effective leaders. These included: good interpersonal skills; self-confidence and achievement-orientation; persistence in the pursuit of goals; ability to cope with interpersonal stress and tolerate frustration; ability to engage in creative problem solving. Trait studies showed that other characteristics that distinguish good from poor leaders included integrity and honesty, a desire to lead and job- related knowledge. Moreover, there has been an increasing focus on identifying the relationships between leadership and the Big Five model of personality. Transactional or transformational theory, focus on leader vision and ability to inspire followers (transformational); leader clarifies performance criteria and ‘rewards’ subordinates for meeting performance expectations (transactional). Path-goal theory focuses on the way that leaders’ behaviours can influence subordinate performance and satisfaction. It draws upon the expectancy theory of motivation to explain a leader’s impact on subordinates. Even though, whatever the theory, there are common aspects. Result of two factors, leadership style and situational favourability, straightly define success of a group. First, depends on the multiple factors such as: character, ethnicity, social background, education, experience, and culture. Inconsiderable of these factors, it seems the leadership approaches have been segregated in to two broad groups: relationship oriented, and task oriented. Second, depends on: leader-follower relations, task structure, and the position
Leadership at times can be a complex topic to delve into and may appear to be a simple and graspable concept for a certain few. Leadership skills are not simply acquired through position, seniority, pay scale, or the amount of titles an individual holds but is a characteristic acquired or is an innate trait for the fortunate few who possess it. Leadership can be misconstrued with management; a manager “manages” the daily operations of a company’s work while a leader envisions, influences, and empowers the individuals around them.
Leadership is a quality which cannot be acquired by any person from the other but it can be acquired by self-determination of a person. Leadership can best be called the personality of the very highest ability-whether in ruling, thinking, imagining, innovation, warring, or religious influencing. Leadership is practiced not so much in words a it is in attitude and in actions. Their actions leave a long lasting memory in the line of history and lead up to may events that occur today. To be a leader one will need many qualities. Leaders have a purpose and strategies to accomplish that purpose. They are driven and motivated. In the end they should be able to attain good results. These innate talents help to make up a leader that will succeed and be efficient in carrying out tasks. But, the purpose of this paper is determine what truly makes a leader successful. A successful leader should be considered more on their impact rather than their accomplishments of their organizations alone for they are not sufficient in determining the key to their success .
Leadership is a complex process with many different approaches. This is a summary of the leadership literature including the pros and cons of each approach. The trait approach implies successful leaders are born with those traits. This theory focuses on identifying certain traits that make people great leaders. Some of the major leadership traits identified in the trait approach are intelligence, self-confidence, determination, integrity, and social ability. There are many advantages to the trait approach. “First, it is intuitively appealing because it fits clearly into the popular idea that leaders are special people who are out front, leading ...
Leadership is the action of leading a group of people or an organization. Leadership is leading a group of people or company to reach a result or further and the organization. A leader is supposed to be an example of how all employees are expected to act and what they should be striving for. Good leaders also don’t use their position within a company to take advantage of the company and its employees. A good leader is supposed to be able to perform their job with high standards, efficiency, and honor. However, for every good leader, there are bad leaders and the worse the leader the more detrimental he or she becomes to employees and the company they run. Poor leadership skills can ultimately ruin a company 's chance of success. The attitude
The Trait Theory points out that there is a certain type of person making a good leader, with the decisive factor being: having or not having distinctive qualities of being a leader. Despite that, being an effective leader can still be a challenge. External and internal influences impact the effectiveness of the program and must be considered in order to succeed. Which leads us to the Behavioural Theory, thinking of what a good leader actually does. Kurt Lewin developed three leadership types, such as the autocratic leader who is a maker, someone who makes decisions without consultation with others.
Presently many of us have learned that managers are primarily administrators who have learned to write business plans, utilize their resources and keep track of progress. We must learn that we are not limited by job title, and that means we can utilize our management skills in any position that we are in. We must also know that we can use our leadership skills in the same situations. On the other hand we have also learned that leaders are people who have an impact on those that surround them. The main difference that separates these two roles is that management is a function that must be utilized in any type of business, and leadership is the relationship that the leader has with his followers, which in turn can motivate and energize the organization.
Management is tasks. Management is a discipline. But management is also people (Drucker, 1999) Management is a very broad term and has been given many different definitions. Smith and Stewart (1999) define it as ‘The system of planning, organising, actuating and controlling the co-ordination of resources for the efficient and effective delivery and exchange of products and services’ (p7). This definition incorporates 4 major principles that almost every definition will include. These 4 categories are compressed functions that G. R. Terry developed in 1960. They are planning, organising, actuating (leading) and controlling. This is a development of the 1916 description by Fayol who, instead of inserting actuating (leading), inserted command and coordinate. The Smith and Stewart (1999) definition includes the modern conception of human resource management. It considers people as individuals to lead instead of personnel management which identifies people as the collective to command. This type of management is implemented in many different organisations both sporting and in general business. Honda implements this notion and has an ethos where everyone in the organisation, from the cleaners to the CEO’s has a voice. They express this notion of individual importance in their slogan † ‘the power of dreams’. Leadership, therefore, is a very iconic part of management and is too vast an area to identify as a single behaviour. The term ‘leadership’ is often confused with ‘management’. Even within a work organisation you cannot identify a manager necessarily by a person’s job title (Mullins, 1999) but by the way they lead (Cole, 1999). A manager, therefore, is a title whereas leadership is a personality trait that a manager should possess. Leadership qualities can be broken down to sub categories or behaviours such as ‘communication’. Communication in the basic skill form is obviously invaluable to a manager’s success. Managers spend most of their time communicating by spoken, written or electronic means with their supervisors, peers, subordinates or customers (Mintzberg, 1973). The importance and differences in communication can be seen in most sporting contexts form football (where Jose Mourinho passed notes to his Chelsea players to communicate his instructions privately) to boxing (where the coach is ever present and vocal during the fight in their designated corner).Therefore it is clear that the continued development of this skill will ultimately underpin a successful manager (Boddy & Patton, 1998). This, however, is communication in its basic form.
As a growing debate, the question at hand is whether great leaders are born with specific leadership traits, or if one can be taught certain traits over time. According to (Wikipedia.com) the approach of listing leadership qualities, often termed "trait theory of leadership", assumes certain traits or characteristics will tend to lead to effective leadership. I believe that leadership traits such as honest, competent, initiative, inspiring, hardworking, intelligent, and the ability to lead the masses, are some of the leadership traits one should possess. Within this paper, I will examine the overall concept of leadership traits, while observing the traits that were, or can be associated with successful leaders.
The method of leadership is almost as similar as management, and a leader can be a manager. “Both management and leadership are seen as positions of responsibility or accountability in an organization” (Edwards, Schedlitzki, Turnbull, & Gill, 2015). Leadership and management can relate and overlap within the roles and functions and are similar within one another in meaning. Together leadership and management direct the actions of a group or individually.
Finally, leadership results in the followers’ behavior, that is purposeful and goal-directed which must be in some organized setting (Leadership Theories and Studies, 2009). Some people believe leadership and management are one in the same; however, this
“The trait approach looks at the personal attributes of leaders” (Yukl, 1989). For example, creativity, passion, determination, innovation, foresight. The power-influence approach examines the effectiveness of leadership to a person in terms of different power that person possesses. (Yukl, 1989)
The Trait leadership focuses on the innate qualities, personality traits and characteristics of an effective leader (Chobanuk & James, 2015). This theory, established in 1946, focused on behaviors and the traditional model of a leader (Northouse, 2013). Leadership practices beginning of 1950, the center is set early in life, from leader traits to leader behaviors. The behavior exhibited by leaders are more important than their physical, mental or emotional attributes. Situational leadership is a broadly recognized approach to leadership, and the critical aspect is that the leader can modify his or her style to the situation determines the effectiveness of task and person oriented leader behaviors.
Leadership and management are two words that are commonly mistaken; the relation and the differences between them are often unclear. Leadership can be defined as the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or a set of goals." Managers are there to plan, organize, lead and monitor employees' activities. Leaders also have to be able to guide an organization through change. As we will see later, vision is a crucial component in the success of this task.
This theory is commonly known as Trait Theory. In trait theory, six individual traits which powerfully associate with the leadership are the intelligence of an individual, improvement, extraversion, conscientiousness, spacing to any new experience as well as self-efficacy. • A situation or any important event might cause any person to rise up to any occasion, which carries out exceptional leadership standard in an average person. This trait is very well known as Great Events Theory. •
Leadership and management are two fundamental concepts which are involved in the effective management of organizations. Leadership in my opinion is a complex concept, which includes association of human qualities and the result of their activities. To be a great leader means not only following own visions, but also work towards company’s goals.