Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Discrimination and its effects
Discrimination and its effects
A proposal about the impact of job satisfaction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Discrimination and its effects
Karishma Patel This case is about interaction between leader and followers and its effects on organization, a very good example of presence of in-group and out- group in many organizations. This is a case of creative director of advertizing agency; who has strong relation with one team than others, who gives special treatment to one team than other. As a result, there is issue of inequality and fairness in the agency. Mills, Smith, and Peters is a reputable for being the best advertising and public relations agency in the country. Carly Peters works for the creative department of the company. Carly …show more content…
Carly who is trying to be successful in her career; uses the Jack’s team for major showcase advertisement because they are willing to go extra mile by working in weekends, and his team is very is very talented. This way Carly gets the most work done in efficient manner, and gets to build strong network with her customers by make them happy. While she neglects the work of other team; who is also trying hard to be in group with Carly, but Carly does not notice their work or simply thinks it is going to be challenging for them. According to LMX theory, leadership making emphasize that Leader should always develop high quality relationship with all of their followers rather than just a few. It attempts to make every follower feels that they are important, and he or she is part of the in-group. It avoids the inequalities and negative implications of being in out of group. Carly by not being fair to all her followers, she is creating inequality in her workplace that results into dissatisfaction and low morals in Julie and Terry’s team. LMX theory describes leadership and prescribes leadership. While it is important it realize the existence of in- group and out-group, it is also very important to create special relationship with all the …show more content…
Jack’s team has done excellent work for Carly, and Carly is also impressed with them. They are also willing to do extra work for Carly, as a result Carly also allocate extra resource to Jack’s team. According to VDL and LMX theory, this dynamics interaction between leader and follower usually gets seen in in-group. Terri and Julie’s team would consider out group per LMX and VDL theory, because Carly is less compatible with their group, their group neither work extra for company neither Carly allocate them any extra
ideals of leadership which could apply in a general case. This model emphasizes the fact that most leadership occurs in interpersonal interaction over an exposition to a large crowd. According to Scholl who performed a study at Jr. Labor Research Center, because leadership is constantly being evaluated by organizational members, superiors, and the public, there are always groups involved in the process as opposed to having a “formal leader” take charge (Scholl, 2003, pp. 2). He goes on to state that even though leadership assigns value to the individual role, there is never a point where the leader in that specific role exerts an absolute sphere of influence without competing claims (Scholl, 2003, pp.3). The process of exercising this type of leadership is inclusive and ethical because it gives an agency to everyone who is a part of the organization (Komives, 2007, p.74). Each person is a part of the leadership process because just be being a follower under a leader there is a relationship attached to oneself. This model is not descriptive but rather prescriptive. It tells one how to act and how to effectively lead rather than simply describe a process which can be observed in nature. The components of leadership involved include inclusivity of others views, the empowerment of those involved, being purposeful with one's goal and aligning others with that goal, and being ethical with good morals. As part of this model each component of this model must be part of a process which includes knowing, being, and doing (Komives, 2007, p.76). Knowing, being, and doing is an interrelated process which influences the leaders thinking and behavior. Knowing i...
Exemplary leaders have a profound and positive influence on the commitment and performance of their followers. In order to achieve and sustain success exemplary leaders have to effectively communicate a clear vision, cultivate a team environment and establish cooperative goals. Coach Boone displayed several actions and behaviors that represent The Five Practices of Exemplary Leadership.
The main component of an organization is people. A team of people work together to achieve the common goal of the organization. For an organization to operate successfully it must have a vision, policies, procedures and governance. Each of these four items are determined, implemented and overseen by the leaders of the organization. Leadership is an important part of each phase of an organization beginning with the start of the organization and continuing until the disbanding of the organization. Since leadership of an organization has a strong impact on every organization it is often researched in the study of organizational behavior (OB) (Kreitner & Kinick, 2014).
LMX Theory organizes followers into groups defined by access to the leader. In some ways, it is like a target with the leader as the center and each concentric circle signifying groups of followers, each with less intimacy with the leader. LMX Theory components are: the leader, the inner circle, the in-group, the out-group, and strangers (Scandura and Schriesheim, 1994). As one gets close to the leader, he/she has more access to the leader and the leader has more influence in the life of the follower. LMX theory follows Jesus’ discipleship model very closely.
In a firm, management and leadership are important and needed. Leadership and management are similar. Actually, leadership and management are totally different. The leadership would influence the firm. The leader would have difference leadership styles to lead the subordinate.
Campus leadership comes in various forms in the educational settings. Each administrator brings special abilities, knowledge and traits into their experiences as an administrator. Campuses across the country vary in student population, economic factors and have various community cultural norms in place. The administrator on an educational campus faces foreseen challenges and also unpredictable obstacles. As a result campus leadership must be confident in decision-making, be effective communicators, willing to accept change in today’s educational climate of high-stakes accountability and build positive relationships with teachers and students.
There are different leadership theories developed throughout the history. Most popular ones are trait theories, behavioral theories, contingency theories, and leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. The author of the post will briefly discuss two theories, Fiedler contingency theory and Leader-Member Exchange (LMX), and compare and contrast their strengths and weakness.
The Leader-Member Exchange Theory, or LMX, is a two-way relationship between management/supervisors and their employees/subordinates. The theory assumes that leaders use different management styles, leadership styles, and behaviors with each individual subordinate or group of subordinates. The exchange between supervisors and subordinates will be inconsistent between each individual member of the group. A supervisor may be very kind and supportive to one employee/group and be very critical and unresponsive to another employee/group. Due to this type of interaction, the LMX theory suggests that leaders classify subordinates into two groups, the in-group members and the out-group members (Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, & Konopaske, 2012, p. 334).
My research provided an opportunity to review and identify different elements of leading from previous studies. As I begin my review, I find myself rediscovering essential qualities of successful leadership. The author provides a very interesting case study that depicts the importance of people skills, (Bennis, 2009). In order to be an effective leader you must be able to relate to others through open communication, (Bennis, 2009). A leader needs to be approachable and personable in their actions. The case study provided an example of a leader that lacked people skills. He had been mentored in an environment that was not conducive to team building, (Bennis, 2009). His leadership approach was to be direct and demanding centered on productivity
One of the topics in organizational development today is leadership. Leadership is what individuals do to mobilize other people in organizations and communities. According to Kouzes & Posner, there are five practices and ten commitments of exemplary leadership. The five practices of exemplary leadership include: Model the way, inspire a shared vision, challenge the process, enable others to act, and encourage the heart. In the Leadership Challenge, Kouzes and Posner found similar patterns and actions of leadership that created the essentials to achieve success. Utilizing the research conducted by Jim Kouzes and Barry Posner, I have created a leadership plan that would apply to the Admission Department at Texas Wesleyan University.
After the servant leadership theory, there is what is known as leader-member exchange (LMX). The leader-member exchange theory “suggests leaders have limited time and resources and share both their personal and positional resources differently with their employees” (Shockley-Zalabak, 2015, p.153). Additionally, the LMX theory focuses on the leader and the subordinates independently and typically the interaction differs with each person.
My biggest personal leadership failure occurred earlier this year when I worked at Einstein Bros Bagels at Coffman Union. I stayed there from January until April making and serving bagels to customers. However, I had the morning shift, the busiest period of the day. Long lines would form every time I was there, and sometimes I couldn’t catch up. One day in April, my co-worker, a veteran making bagels, was absent, and someone who didn’t have as much experience replaced her. What followed was a mess. My team chemistry with the replacement was dreadful, and a ton of people had to wait a while for their orders. My manager saw the incident, and after my shift was over, he gave me the option of leaving my job. I accepted, but my self-confidence was in a state that was beyond repair. It was one of the first times that I felt I let others down with my work performance. I learned that I shouldn’t expect to be great at everything and that I should analyze my weaknesses before taking on something challenging.
(Kotter, 2013,) states that management is a set of processes. It involves planning, budgeting, structuring jobs, staffing jobs, measuring performance and problem-solving. Nonetheless the functions of management are not limited to managers and supervisors. According to Nag (2011) leaders choose to use different styles of leadership which suits the circumstance and helps to best tackle the challenges being faced in the organization. It is the leadership strategy that determines the leadership style. Hence, there is no single correct leadership style that should be used consistently. (Johnson, n.d.) further states that within each leadership style there are advantages
Assessing positive leadership traits is very essential to acknowledging a good leader. The following positive leadership traits are, “Task competence, interpersonal competence, intuition, traits of character, biophysical traits, and personal traits” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 469).
Leader should have the shared responsibility and collaborative quality. For example, instead of making the strategy alone, he will gather the idea of all brilliant workers to increase the productivity of the organisation.