Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Is grammar important in all workplaces
Grammar is important for jobs essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Is grammar important in all workplaces
In the article “ I Won't Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why? By Kyle Wiens, explain why he would only hire people with great grammar for his companies. Wiens believes that grammar is something essential on a daily basis.“I have a zero tolerance approach to grammar mistakes that people look stupid”1 according to Kyle Wiens, owner of iFixit or Dozuki (online repair manual companies). To look professional on any kind of job and specially on important companies like his, people should be prepared for anything. A person with great grammar would be the best eligible for a job on any important company. Firstly, in companies where everything is about writing, their employees have to be perfect especially in grammar. Wiens says “ iFixit or Dozuki, takes mandatory grammar test”1. The way that Wines hires people for his company is a convenient way for companies to be the best, because his company needs people with perfect grammar by cause of what his company does which is making …show more content…
People would reflect their education in their grammar. Some people might not know how to spell something and there is the problem, they could be a misunderstanding on what they were trying to say. It is important to fix any mistakes that all people was basically used to do because it would be words that sound the same but they are not spelled the same. All people who have this problem should fix it and everyone should not let the laziness take control. In conclusion, Wines should be the person who should make people think about what they have made wrong all the time and to take action over the problem that could sometimes affect people’s lives. Grammar is something essential everywhere, is the way people communicate and nothing is better than communicating with the right words. Nothing is wrong when you get something wrong but is better to fix it. Grammar would talk a lot about the
Sam Dillion wrote “What Corporate America Can’t Build: A Sentence” for an audience of college students, employees and corporate people. In his article, Sam points out that companies are spending a lot of money annually on remedial training. According to Sam, the writing problem appears in e-mails, reports and texts. He is informing his audience to brush up on writing skills before entering the corporate world, in order to avoid remedial training. Companies like to hire employees with excellent writing skills but many of employees and applicants fall short of that standard.
In the article by Kyle Wein “I Won’t Hire People Who Use Poor Grammar. Here’s Why.” explains reasons as to why the owner of a business only hires educated, employees. If someone cannot tell the difference between simple words such as there, their, and they’re, the manager will not hire that applicant. That’s not the only thing Wein looks for in an employee. He is looking for smart, educated, employees who use good grammar. “Yes, language is constantly changing, but that doesn’t make grammar unimportant. Good grammar is credibility, especially on the internet.” Grammar is important no matter what the job is. According to the author, without good use of grammar you will not have a job. Without a job you will have no money, no satisfaction, and/or
499) Immediately, the inappropriate use of his language distances me from continuing to read. The tone of this statement comes off as one-sided and stubborn. Rather than approaching the statement in a scholarly fact, Wiens down plays the intelligence of his work with an ignorant remark. Also, when Wiens mentioned stocking shelves requires grammar proficiency, which is not true in most cases. Again, he doesn’t have creditable information to back up his claim. To make his statement credible, Wiens should have included a study based off of various shelf stocking hiring processes. This hiring process could have included what specific skill set or educational background a company requires their employees to obtain. Additionally, this study could have been collaborated with top warehouse companies in the United States with quotes and numerical information. Wiens said, “I’ve found that people who make fewer mistakes on a grammar test also make fewer mistakes when they are doing something completely unrelated to writing- like stocking shelves or labeling parts.” (p. 499) Additionally, my best friend’s dad, Justin, is an immigrant from Cambodia who has trouble with English grammar. He immigrated to the United States on June of 1992. Justin has been working at an inventory warehouse for nearly nine years. Sine working at the warehouse, he learned to verbally communicate in English and is coherent to the language. However, he lacks an understanding of written English grammar. Although, for Justin’s specific job title, he doesn’t need to distinguish the difference between to and too. The relevance of this example displays the unimportance of the English grammar in certain jobs. Otherwise, Justin would have been terminated within the first few months on the job for continuing to make costly mistakes. Additionally, my second job was a sales associate at a boutique and the
The Phenomenology of Error is a passage that is written by Joseph M. Williams. He evaluates through the concept that errors of grammar and usage are puzzling. Many believe that we understand the true meaning behind grammar, but we do not. Without a doubt, William repeatedly questioned what defines error and who decides what an error is. Throughout the passage William attempts to describe how the professionals who create rules for grammatical errors tend to break those rules themselves. William elaborates on how the social problems that exist in our society are neglected greatly because we focus on the issues of grammar to a greater extent. Our disapproval for grammar errors had always been seen as a larger problem. The idea that people take
today’s world. People have pointed out that their ability to spell out words has become difficult
1) His selection in employees is based on required skills instead of their abilities or personalities which would help him to understand the interpersonal skills of his new hires.
Children were taught to speak in a proper manner and because they were taught to speak correctly they wrote in a proper way as well. As technology evolved and texting came more profound grammar was becoming a lost art. In Dana Goldstein’s article ,‘Why Kids Can’t Write’, she talks about what teachers are doing about grammar. The teachers are not doing much about the grammar issue in schools.
I am an average speller. I am able to spell a range of words without help of others or spell checker, this is because throughout my education I have learned how to spell.
In 1999, people could start sending text messages to other people. With different networks to their own, life became easier because of text messaging users. Soon later, English language became known as ‘text speak’, a way we write now by abbreviating long and big words. This is causing teens to lose the ability to learn how to spell and read. Now that text messaging allows kids to abbreviate, kids are now failing school classes by abbreviating in their school work (Cooke).
Autocorrect recognizes a misspelled word as well as replacing it with what is likely to be the correct word. In many ways, autocorrect and autocompletion are very useful in their efficiency; however, it is reasonable to assume that they have the opposite effect of learning. Instead of giving someone the help they need to correct his or her mistakes, autocorrection notifications are so brief that the person is barely aware of a mistake before it is erased from existence
The truth is, I've always had a flair for typos. It is not getting better with experience - nor with spellcheck. My ability to introduce mistakes has kept well ahead of the efforts of Microsoft and Apple to eliminate them.
The abundance of technology is hurting their grammar and diction. Due to grammar check and auto-corrects that technology provides, students are becoming more reckless with their writing. From text messaging and tweeting, these young writers are losing their ability to generate a complete sentences and essays. More so, they tend to overlook the use of punctuation and capitalization. Additionally, students often abbreviate words even in a professional situation such as emailing their professors.
...y that doesn’t replace knowledge, but reinforces it. As a high school teacher I will tell my students to never rely on spell check because it will often steer you wrong. Technology is great, but students still have to have the know-how without it. Oftentimes, spell check becomes a way for a student to avoid learning how language works. When a student is presented with unfamiliar material, they don't know how to parse what they are reading. If they learn how language works, how it is spelled, how it is used, they can extrapolate meaning. I understand that the usual methods don't necessarily work for someone with dyslexia, but for most of the student population, expecting correct spelling by high school is not too high a bar to reach.
...ncements in their current employment. Over all, a good English education will help with enhancing a person’s life.
Susan Adams and Kyle Weins have both written articles on the importance of using good grammar in the workplace. Each article gives numerous compelling reasons why this is a good practice. Susan Adams’ article first reason for doing so is in regards to how other people would view someone who uses bad grammar. She brings out that someone’s image can be damaged when they have improper speech habits; consequently their chances of advancing at work could be limited. Second, she shows how using poor grammar could cause a manager to view an employee as unorganized or unable to perform more advanced tasks. Finally, she brings out that someone who has poor speaking habits could be perceived as not having a firm grasp on the subject they are speaking about (Adams). Kyle Weins article also brings out some important points on bad grammar in the workplace. First, he shows that in today’s world people’s intelligence is judged based on what they say or what they type. The second point relates to how a manager could perceive someone with poor grammar. A manager could see an employee who uses poor grammar as someone who struggles to concentrate on tasks and doesn’t show attention to detail. Finally, he shows that peo...