Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Some popular examples of causes of toxic leadership
Maslow's theory of hierarchy of needs
Maslow's hierarchy of needs in organizations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Some popular examples of causes of toxic leadership
Toxicity in leaders is, unfortunately, a common reality in many organizations and political setups around the world. I grew up in a nation, where people were and even now are victims of toxic political and administrative leaders. I always thought, why some leaders, either consciously or unconsciously, become toxic leaders. What are the subtleties that drive a person to become toxic for the people around him or her? It was quite interesting to read how some of the human psychological needs, play a good role to (Abraham Maslow's (1971) well-known hierarchy of deficiency and growth needs -Lipman-Blumen 2005) make people seek and respond to leaders who assure them in good, bad and ugly ways. I always supposed, getting attracted to noble visions
of non-toxic leaders is not unusual but never, I was able to reason out the attraction to toxic leaders’ grand illusions. This week’s readings gave me some insights to why people get attracted to toxic leaders. My thoughts again circle back to Maslow's pyramid of needs. In most of the developing and underdeveloped countries, citizens’ concentrate more on the basic economic needs and it doesn’t really matter for them who provides that assurance as long as their basic needs are fulfilled. The citizens, busy fulfilling the base needs fall for and become very vulnerable are slowly come under the grip of the toxic triangle (The toxic triangle: Destructive leaders, susceptible followers, and conducive environments). As far as my thoughts go back in the history, the best example for the toxic triangle and I can only quote partition of India in 1947. In August 1947, when, after three hundred years in India, the British finally left, the subcontinent was partitioned into two independent nation states: Hindu-majority India and Muslim-majority Pakistan. Since then the toxicity of the destructive leaders, their blind followers, and environmental contributions have prevailed forever.
1. Merriam-Webster dictionary defines leadership as the office or position of a leader; capacity to lead; the act or an instance of leading, and it defines a leader as a person who has commanding authority or influence; a first or principal performer of a group. In the 1965 movie “In Harm’s Way”, Rear Admiral Torrey displayed the traits of a leader throughout the movie. He took care of his SAILORS, when the widower XO onboard his command was having drinking problems because of the manner and circumstances in which his wife died, RADM Torrey took the time to talk to him and gave him advice on doing the right thing, to quit drinking, let go of the past, and move on with his life. Instead of punishing him, RAMD Torrey tried to help him. During battle, RAMD Torrey was a leader by letting his friend CDR Powell know that it was fine to be afraid, that battles are fought by scared men who find the courage and commitment to fight and carryout the mission. RAMD Torrey surrounded himself with SAILORS he could trust, men who would carry out plans in the face of danger and adversity. I was fond of the scene where the Command Duty Officer onboard the cruiser did not slow down to wait for the ship’s CO to catch-up and board, he made a decision to continue at full speed, leaving the harbor during the December 7, 1941, Japanese attack, and thus saving the ship.
When I was on a post surgical floor I witnessed a scenario where leadership was ineffective. It involved an RN and the nurse manager for the floor who was responsible for assigning the patients to nurses. The nurse manager on this floor usually only had one or two patients and spent most of their time dealing with any problems that arose on the floor. One RN was very upset with her patient load and said it was unfair and wanted to have at least one less patient as she said all 5 of her patients were going to be a lot of work. The nurse manager dismissed the RN and said there were care aides on floor to help so she would be fine and told her to get to work. The leadership issues here were a lack of communication
Lipman-Blumen, J. & Blumen, J. (2005). The 'Secondary' of the 'Se The Allure of Toxic Leaders. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
As a result, Jeffers personified the negative characteristics of charismatic leaders, and he is the antithesis of the positive attributes. The public perception is Jeffers gregarious, when in fact, he was unresponsive to feedback and disregarded company policies these traits embody a charismatic leader (Spahr, 2016). Additionally, his leadership style is autocratic rather than democratic, and while in particular industries that approach may be advantageous that is not the case at Fortuga. Furthermore, he was chauvinistic resulting in the resignation of two out of his three female vice presidents. As a result, employee engagement was at an all-time low and staff talked to Fortuga’s biggest competitor about employment opportunities. These characteristics reinforce the discernment, in addition to this other traits, he is a narcissistic leader too. According to Maccoby (2000), the negative traits of a narcissistic leader include poor listening and lack of empathy. At the same time, these leaders exhibit superior vision and have an inordinate number of followers, including the board of directors and public.
Supervisors such as these promote themselves through visible short-range demonstrations of accomplishments, but are unconcerned with staff development or morale (Reed, 2004, p. 67). Toxic leaders affect the atmosphere of an agency by creating a demotivational environment while attendin...
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, Jesus Christ, Mahatma Ghandi, Lucifer; the list could go on. All these men had one thing in common; they were extraordinary leaders who gained loyal followers. These men also had several differences; the biggest being that some were destructive with their power and their ideals weren’t exactly on par with normality. Yet, what made people follow and respect the wishes of leaders who were destructive and insane? The attraction to these powerful leaders is found in the way that they are able to fill a void in that individual’s life. This void could consist of longing for safety and care, being lonely, or even missing having that family atmosphere. These are all things that destructive leaders are adept at providing.
In the classic poem and plays Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Oedipus the King by Sophocles, and The Odyssey by Homer, the main characters are leaders with differing successes. Julius Caesar gets killed by his own "friends", Oedipus gouges out his eyes, and Odysseus faced many setbacks, but managed to get home. All of these classical heroes had one thing in common. This was that they tried to lead by dominance. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Oedipus the King by Sophocles, and The Odyssey by Homer, all of
The difference between a good and bad leader manifests itself in the habits and actions of that leader. Often, a good leader practices virtues that naturally draw others to them while constantly guiding their subordinates through physical and moral hardship. They uplift those around them, ensure the growth of their subordinates, and maintain a healthy climate of dignity and respect. Meanwhile, a bad leader creates a toxic environment, one that may be exclusive, harmful, or demeaning to nature. Bad leaders, such as those observed in The Kunk Gun, Alpha, and Platoon, engage in vices that harm their ability to effectively lead.
The narcissist theory was created by Machiavelli in the year 1530. In this theory, “Machiavelli suggested that leaders need to be feared as well as malevolent” (Ledlow & Coppola, 2014). The leaders in this model use fear as a motivational tool used to manipulate the populace to the bidding of the leader. I feel like the best examples
To me, leaders are constantly surrounding us. People constantly need to be led and they seek out individuals around them who have personalities that stand out – the basic qualities of leadership, the Great Man Theory. This could be in terms of their appearance, knowledge, charisma, behaviour or style. For example, popular actors/actresses might not be great leaders but they influence the thoughts of people through advertisements through their appearance and charisma. Leadership is also a process where trust of people needs to be gained and established before followers are doing things willingly and without having to use pressure. Managers are different in this aspect, as they are given authority/power and trust factor might not be required to actively participate in management, subordinates might not be performing their tasks willingly. The above idea is adopted from the most recent leadership definition by Manfred Kets de Vries, he defines leadership style as the point of interaction between the leader’s character, the follower’s character and the situation. (Manfred Kets de Vries, The Leadership Mystique, Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2001) To gain people’s trust, the first steps is to communicate, Warren Bennis observed the significance of rhetoric and eloquent, “Effective leaders put words to the formless longings and deeply felt needs of others. They create communities out of words.” (Bennis Warren, An Invented Life: Reflections on Leadership and Change, Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesly, 1993)
Manfred talks specifically about four of these pathologies. The first type is the narcissistic. The narcissistic personality thinks too much about himself and pursues power and prestige while disregarding other people’s needs. These people are sensitive to confrontation and need to be instructed with caution. They will usually prefer to follow a father figure. I had business partner that fits this description.
Colonel George Reed, in his strategic research project links an entire series of eighteen personal characteristics, which include; incompetence, arrogance, and cowardice for example, to eighteen unique types of toxic leaders. And while many of these toxic leader types share similar negatively manifested
Autocratic leaders have been described as controlling, power-orientated and closed-minded (Bass 2008). They stress obedience, loyalty and strict adherence to the rules (Bass 2008). Autocratic leaders may be disliked by their team, but this may evolve into appreciation and fondness once the positive results of their leadership become evident (Bass 2008). Although staffmay dislike autocratic leaders, they often work well under them (Bass 2008). Schoel et al (2011) found that well-liked leaders might be perceived as ineffective while disliked leaders might be perceived as
Leaders are not always to be trusted. George Orwell has made that clear with his book Animal Farm. Leadership is a powerful force that can be tainted, like the pigs that were trusted with the job of making the animals lives better were, despite what were originally good intentions. Equality could not be obtained despite having promised that all animals are equal, and manipulation and lies were used in abundance to hide the fact that their leader was corrupted. Even though some leaders are corrupted, other leaders can be trusted. It is just a matter of finding out which ones. At the end of the day people will always have their own thoughts and opinions and they are more valuable than many seem to notice.
Have you ever had the pleasure of working with an individual who was completely full of themselves? This person loved to be the center of attention and the topic of every subject, had extravagant dreams and considered themselves to be a person of many talents. This same person believed that they were a better leader than you would ever be and had no problem telling you that. He or she thought that the best way to gain the admiration of others and receive confirmation of their authority was by “talking down” to those who threaten them. The qualities that I mentioned are all common traits of a narcissist. Narcissist tend to think that they are better leaders than what they actually are according to their peers and coworkers. Proverbs 29:2 says "When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice; but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn" (King James Bible Online, 2015).