More handpicked essays just for you.
Examples of ineffective leadership
Leadership styles and their effects
Leadership styles and their application
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King Jr., Abraham Lincoln, Winston Churchill, Theodore Roosevelt, Jesus Christ, Mahatma Ghandi, Lucifer; the list could go on. All these men had one thing in common; they were extraordinary leaders who gained loyal followers. These men also had several differences; the biggest being that some were destructive with their power and their ideals weren’t exactly on par with normality. Yet, what made people follow and respect the wishes of leaders who were destructive and insane? The attraction to these powerful leaders is found in the way that they are able to fill a void in that individual’s life. This void could consist of longing for safety and care, being lonely, or even missing having that family atmosphere. These are all things that destructive leaders are adept at providing. First of all, humans have natural needs that they are constantly working towards meeting. These needs include substance and protection. All human beings have a desire for a safe living environment with food and shelter. Also, they wish for themselves ...
What is power to a human? As time has gone by, there have been many forms of control and influence in the world. Many strive to achieve total rule over a society or group of individuals. Yet the question still presents itself to the average man. Why does man desire power so greatly even though there is visible trouble that follows? Shelley’s Frankenstein, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, and Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, whether through the situation or the character themselves, depict the evils and hardships due to an imbalance and poor management of power.
Lipman-Blumen, J. & Blumen, J. (2005). The 'Secondary' of the 'Se The Allure of Toxic Leaders. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
Looking back at the past, individuals can read about how some of the world’s most powerful leaders have risen, and fallen. These leaders helped their country in their own unique way that ranges anywhere from conquering other countries, to aiding their own country in a depression. In their own way, each leader has a façade that they show as the rise to power, and one individual sticks out from the rest. Adolf Hitler rose to power in a unique way that was comparable to some, but still vastly different. A lot of key factors in Hitler’s life, played key
Abused power by leaders has the potential to influence human beings into persecuting and discriminating against others. A person who has control over others has the potential to guide them away from morality, resulting in oppression. Groups in society who demonstrate abusive power are called cults; they trap people in a feeling of artificial security. Those who seek a way to cope with life’s difficulties and escape responsibilities will turn to morally corrupt leaders in order to feel a sense of belonging and have others make decisions for them. In the novel, The Chrysalids, the community of Waknuk turns to Joseph Storm for approval and guidance, rather than acting on their own instinct and decisions. This society attempts to convince others that authority figures are the only ones who are “in a position to judge whether the next step was a rediscovery, and so, safe to take; or whether it deviated.” (Chrysalids, 40) Religious cults victimize those who are unlike or question their beliefs and force or deceive others into accepting their strict traditions. Cults turn to the weak and corrupt their minds, influencing them into degrading others for their own beliefs. Nevertheless, not all cults target people, there are several who treat people with a false sense of affection in order to brainwash them into persecuting others. Religious fanaticism and extremism has the potential to guide
Machiavelli is accurate when he states that it is better to choose being feared over being loved. As a leader you must be willing to do what it takes to gain political success. Show authority and have your followers respect you, not only as a person, but also in
Ambition can consume leaders, nonetheless some leaders can handle the pressure that comes with having to lead individuals like Abraham Lincoln. However some leaders like Adolf Hitler and Macbeth allowed their ambition to get the best of them and cause harm. Hitler allowed his ambition to drive him to make catastrophic decisions such as trying to conquer other (stronger) countries, make dangerous weapons, torturer, and kill millions of innocent people. Whereas Macbeth allowed his ambition to kill the people that loved and supported him the most in order to gain control of the kingdom. Both Macbeth and Hitler illustrate leadership, but turned mad in order to consume more power.
Every empire, dynasty, government, regime etc. has consisted of both good and bad leadership. This directly affects the society in which they oversee and/or control. The infamous Roman Empire experienced its share of triumphs and depression through its leader’s actions. Run as a monarchy, the kings of Rome had various ways of implementing their authority. Many of them chose to rule based on their interests and desires while others catered to the welfare of Rome’s booming population. Depending on the leader some received accolades and others faced a tragic ending due to their ignorance. Prior to the formation of the republic Rome the people endured both the spoils and hardships of war. The actions and/or qualities of the good and bad leaders of Rome had a direct correlation with its well being. Opinions vary but there were definitely standouts on both ends of the spectrum.
...s to become wrapped up in something so awful. It also shows how easily people can be manipulated in the masses due to a man's charisma and choice with words (may I remind you of another charismatic leader- Hitler).
Humans are inherently evil. Human nature is to take leadership when there is no “power” figure. This, in some cases, may be a good thing if the leader knows how to control his power and the things around him, but most of the time it turns out bad and they become similar to a dictator. In Lord of the Flies just after the boys’ crash on the island, they have an assembly to decide what will happen next. In the assembly, one of the many topics brought up, was who should be chief. In the midst of a near argument, ...
"How does Maslow’s theory of human needs explain conflict in human society?” Maslow’s model of what the five basic needs are for humans to advance, as described by Urwiler, R.N. (2008) are physiological needs, safety needs, social needs, self-esteem needs and self-actualization needs. Once an individual is missing any of the basic physiological needs to survive such as “oxygen, food, water and warmth”, then the behavior changes. “If one or more of these basic needs is lost, the priorities of a person immediately shift to satisfying the missing need” (p.83). Maslow, A. H. (1948) also found that meeting these needs could also address other conflicts in society. Humans need food, water, clothing and shelter to survive.
bodies’ needs wants and desires. It avoids discomfort and pain seeks only things that involve
...h as food, drink, shelter, and clothing, which cannot be given up due to our nature.
The ‘Hierarchy of needs’ proposed by Abraham Maslow in 1943 describes the basic needs of humans. Looking at the pyramid, one can see that most of the needs can cause violence. Food is one of the most basic needs of humans. For example, two men are hunting for one deer. These men are showing ‘warlike’ behavior because they aum re competing against nature, which is in this case the deer. Secondly, the two men behave ‘warlike’ because they competing against each other for the deer. Each one wants to be the first to conquer the deer.
a need for a good not yet acquired or possessed.” In other words we want what
Every human being has needs. On the most basic level, humans are animals, all animals, and all organisms, for that matter, have needs that act as a ‘motivation’ to ascertain their survival. Henry Murray defined needs as “potentiality or readiness to respond in a certain way under certain given circumstances" (1938).One distinguishing feature between us and other organisms however, is that humans may also posses wants or ‘goals’ whereas animals do not. Wants do not occur until needs have been satisfied, animals, especially in the wild, do not know when to expect their next meal, so are in constant pursuit of food, this means their needs are never fully satisfied, so, according to Isidoro Martínez, wants cannot materialise. “Once material needs satisfied, we may discover some intangible needs, like being valued by others, and self-esteem” However, arguably, these ‘intangible needs’ may be better preponderantly described as emotional wants, as being valued is not a necessity for survival in the short term. As our population has grown, society has decided to lay out these needs and wants in the form of human rights, endeavouring to ensure that everyone is able to fulfil their needs and can work towards achieving their desires.