Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
What is cognitive dissonance? essay
What is cognitive dissonance? essay
What is cognitive dissonance? essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: What is cognitive dissonance? essay
I started playing soccer at the age of four years old. Throughout my life, I graduate from recreational soccer to playing travel soccer in fifth grade. From fifth grade to eleventh grade, I spent four or five days a week throughout the year playing and practicing soccer. I would endure two hour practices multiple times a week. I would suffer through hours of traveling for games and tournaments on the weekends. The result of the time and effort I put into soccer was that I came to enjoy the sport more. The harder the work I put in, the more I came to enjoy the sport. This agrees with the definition cognitive dissonance. The dissonance was created because I did not enjoy the work I was doing. However, to rid the dissonance I come to convince myself that I loved the game of soccer. This resulted in my overall enjoyment for soccer to be greater than it would have had I not suffered through tough practices and long road trips. …show more content…
The idea that people tend to increase their enjoyment or fondness for something the harder they have worked for it. This is what I experienced. The dissonance was created because I was going through hard experiences or experiences that I did not enjoy and that seemed virtually unrewarding. I went through physically challenging practices and long, boring car rides for a sport I was not going to play in college. In order to reduce the dissonance, I convinced myself that I must really enjoy the sport. I didn't need external incentives for me to continue practicing because I must really like to do all these things already. This is how the effort justification works. I put in hard effort, and because of that, I enjoyed the
American social psychologist and original developer of the theory of Cognitive Dissonance Leon Festinger breaks down his theory into two main parts. First, the presence of dissonance, inconsistency or unpleasantness, will psychologically motivate a person to achieve consonance, consistency or pleasantness (Festinger 3). Psychologist Elliot Aronson, key researcher in the 20th century of this theory, expands on the definition of dissonance to be more straightforward. Dissonance occurs when a person holds two ideas, beliefs, or opinions at the same time that are contradictory with one and other. Part two of the theory states that a person will attempt to avoid situations or knowledge that would possibly or pro...
Cognitive dissonance is when an individual feels uncomfortable because they are a good person but they have chose to do a bad things. Instead of dealing with the consequences they ignore the situation. Cognitive dissonance can relate to Lords of the flies book on Chapter 9. The morning after the boys killed Simon thinking it was the
One study done by Leon Festinger in 1957 demonstrates the desire to resolve cognitive dissonance. In this experiment, participants had to perform a series of extremely boring tasks, such as putting spools of thread into a box, dumping them out, and then putting them back in for half an hour and turning wooden knobs (that performed no action other than turning) quarter turns until they were all turned, and then starting back at the beginning and turning them all another quarter turn until the “end” of the study. After the participants were finished with their deliberately boring task, they were asked to lie to the next set of participants (actually just confederates) and were offered either one dollar or twenty dollars to tell them that the study was exciting and enjoyable. This task created cognitive dissonance, which can also occur when reading Science Fiction. After the participants lied, they were asked to honestly rate the task they performed. Surprisingly, the participants who were paid less rated the experiment more highly than those who were paid more. The explanation behind this is that the participants who were paid more cold justify their lie with the fact that they got twenty for it, thus resolving the cognitive dissonance. On
From an early age I always knew I would be playing soccer my whole life. My dad showed me the ropes of how to play and got me interested right away. By the age of three I had started playing, and to this day I have not stopped. Soccer has been a huge part of my life and I don’t know where I would be today if I never played. I met some amazing people playing soccer including my coaches who encouraged me and told me never to give up as well as my teammates who became my friends and were always there for me.
I started playing soccer when I was four years old. At the time I had a lot of problems. To name a few, I was bad at working with others, I was a sore loser, and I did not handle pain or disappointment well. When I started to play soccer I had a low self esteem and was terribly shy. Going up and talking to people was not on my list of things to do. This made it pretty hard for me to fit in with all the other kids and make friends. It was hard to enjoy playing soccer when I felt as though I had no friends on the team. My parents noticed my dislike in the sport, but urged me to keep playing anyway.
... information, it is clear that cognitive dissonance is a common occurrence to all individuals and no one has control over it. All individuals strive towards reducing the effects it may have on their activities and on their mind. The environment that children are brought up should be controlled because as seen here it plays a role in shaping the beliefs they hold on.
Since the theory was published, cognitive dissonance has made a big impact in the way that people view attitudes and behaviors. To have a clear understanding of the cognitive dissonance theory it important to clearly understand the term cognition. A cognition is the knowledge a person has about something. They can relate to emotions, thoughts, facts or values (Barker, 2003). People hold a vast amount of cognitions with them and many of them are not conflicting with each other. But when cognitions do conflict or contradict with each other dissonance occurs and it leaves an individual in a state of uncomfortable distress. It is evident that people do not like being in a state of dissonance but researchers even argue the desire to hav...
According to Festinger (1957), we hold many cognitions about the world and ourselves. When they clash, a discrepancy is evoked, resulting in a state of tension known as cognitive dissonance. As the experience of dissonance is unpleasant, we are motivated to reduce or eliminate it, and achieve consonance.
According to Green (1959), “Festinger proposed a theory concerning cognitive dissonance…the present experiment was to design this derivation under controlled, laboratory conditions.” In this experiment, students at Standford University that were in psychology classes were the subjects. The subjects were instructed to perform a boring tedious task. Afterword, they were asked to tell the next subject that the task they did was fun. Some subjects were paid a dollar, and the rest of the subjects were paid twenty dollars to lie to the next subject. In this paper, which subjects experienced cognitive dissonance, how they experience cognitive dissonance, and personal examples of cognitive dissonance will be discussed.
“Humans are not a rational animal, but a rationalizing one” (“Class 20”). This was asserted by the much acclaimed, significant, and influential social psychologist Leon Festinger as referencing to his theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Social psychology is “a branch of psychology particularly concerned with understanding social behaviors such as” incentive and compliance (Sheehy). Festinger’s contributions to the social and cognitive branches of psychology as well psychology overall prove themselves worthy to today. This theory specifically challenged many common notions that were seemingly already accepted by behaviorists everywhere during his time (Tavris and Aronson). Its reality awakens its verifications. Consecutively, its “enormous motivational power” affects many on a daily basis (Tavris and Aronson). In the final analysis, the theory of Cognitive Dissonance by Leon Festinger is fundamental to behaviorism while directly changing the way human beings across the planet think and do.
The human psyche frequently experiences the phenomena of internal contradiction, followed by an internal struggle for some semblance of balance or consistency (Hall, 1998). Cognitive dissonance acts as motivation for people to behave in a manner that effectively reduces said dissonance and restores balance. Leon Festinger’s theory of cognitive dissonance explores this occurrence and the subsequent actions that people take in order to create a balance between their ideals.
(Festinger 1957). When multiple “cognitions” — information or opinions about about the self, one’s actions, or the environment — contradict each other, an individual experiences a psychologically uncomfortable state known as “dissonance” (Festinger, 1957, p. 3). Festinger suggests that an individual is motivated to reduce dissonance as one is motivated to reduce hunger. (Festinger 1957). The theory of cognitive dissonance predicts that decisions perceived as important, which involve a long process of evaluating alternatives, and are irreversible will arouse greater levels of dissonance (Griffin, Ledbetter and Sparks, 2015).
While these behaviors can change due to factors within the person who hold them. An example can be that people who smoke cigarettes (behavior) know it is bad for them and it can causes cancer (cognition).but they still do it. Cognitive dissonance theory is based on three fundamental assumptions. First, people are sensitive to contradictions between their actions and their beliefs.
b) In a situation of dissonance, people will avoid information and events that may increase dissonance. (Twente, n.d) Assumptions of the Theory Cognitive dissonance is based on three main assumptions which are; a) Humans are sensitive to inconsistencies between actions and beliefs According to Festinger, every human at some point recognize, when they are acting that they are in contrary with their beliefs or opinions. The result is that they become cautious whenever they notice such inconsistency. b) Recognition of this inconsistency will result in dissonance and will make the individual want to resolve the dissonance.