Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Strength and weakness of cultural influence on behaviour
Causes of conflict and types of conflicts essay
Cultural influence on social behavior
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dimensions of Conflict and Social Style models
Introduction
This paper will describe both the dimensions of conflict and social styles model. The context will include how to use both models to diagnose and resolve conflicts. This paper will use a conflict scenario that demonstrates how to effectively use both models. The dimensions of conflict and social style models are effective tools for a professional practitioner to diagnose and resolve conflict.
Social Style
The social style model uses observable human behaviors to identify the predominant styles that the parties involved have that could lead to conflict. According to Furlong (2005) “This is done by looking for indicators along two broad dimensions of human behaviour, assertiveness and responsiveness”.
Carolyn's assertive indicators are that she only talks when she needs to and she has a soft tone to her voice. Carolyn has little body movement and generally shy's away from direct eye contact. Carolyn's indicators of responsiveness are that she has a casual posture and likes to use personal life experiences rather than data when solving the residents' problems or conflicts. Carolyn's indicators are that she is ask assertive and emote responsive fitting her into the amiable predominant style.
Nick's assertive indicators are that he talks a lot even when it may be inappropriate. He talks fast and loud which projects his voice. Nick prefers to stare directly into the eyes of whom he is talking. Nick's indicators of responsiveness are that he has a rigid posture and is task orientated who prefers to base his decisions on data rather than personal experiences. Nick is tell assertive and control responsive ...
... middle of paper ...
...social styles models provide essential diagnostic tools for resolving a multitude of conflicts. Both models encourage the practitioner to restore positive communication between the parties involved in conflict. Understanding one's cognitive, emotional, and bahavioural dimensions as well as the predominant styles of each party involved allow the practitioner to diagnose conflict without any additional information.
Conclusion
Using both the dimensions of conflict and social style models to diagnose the conflict between Carolyn and Nick a practitioner can create a successful resolution plan. Both models are
effective tools for a professional practitioner to diagnose and resolve conflict.
Works Cited
Furlong, G. T. (2005). The conflict resolution toolbox: Models and maps for analyzing, diagnosing, and resolving conflict. Ontario, Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
Have you ever wondered why you react to situations in the manner to you do? Whether you are calm and collect, or rigid and boisterous, the way you react to life is linked to your personality. Many different models exist to determine your personality type using answers from a series of questions or selecting between two opposing options. The most popularly used assessment is the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test, which is based off the foundation of C. G. Jung’s work on personality types. The typology in the Myers-Briggs Indicator Type test yields results that determine if the person is introverted (I) or extraverted (E), sensing (S) or intuitive (N), thinking (T) or feeling (F), and judging (J) or perceiving (P). Each of these types corresponds
Henry’s personality type is reflective because he has a low dominance and sociability, seen when he is described as a good listener (Strout 4), people with reflective personalities let others do all the talking and leading. Olive is a directive communicator, someone with high dominance and low sociability. This is seen when Olive’s son Christopher calls her out for being a bad mother, she has the nerve to act offended and cannot believe that he would say such a thing, but she does not realize that he is right (Strout 231). Malcom’s personality is emotive, a high sociability and high dominance. Malcom exhibits it the most clearly when he goes to confront Angie for calling his house, he has the power and ability to come at her cursing and yelling with no remorse (Strout 59). Bob and Kerry are both supportive communicators, people with a high sociability and a low dominance. Bob shows his communication style when he easily plays off his wife’s confusion at him being in Miami, but is not dominant enough to come out right away and tell her the truth (Strout 132-136). Kerry displayed it for many years as she did not ever tell Marlene that she had an affair with her husband, yet she was able to remain friends with her even though she thought Marlene knew about the affair. All of these character’s get the same personality type when they have their affairs. They each get a low sociability and a
One can easily compare my brother, Andrew, interpersonal conflict with this model. The model consists of the two most important aspects of a conflict, communication behaviors, and the perception of those behaviors. The communication behaviors that existed within Andrew interpersonal conflict were obviously differences between both parties. My brother, Andrew, felt attacked and betrayed by his friends and family, so his communication was very selective. When Andrew would speak to the other party (friends and family) he would lash out by yelling and screaming. Whereas, the communication behaviors among Andrew’s friends and my family was claim but aggressive. They showed their true emotions, even though those emotions hurt Andrew severely. They were brutally honest and they did not back down. They made sure that their message was
Conventional seems to support my primary style through points that I am agreeable, reliable and steady, and very respectful towards others, but acts to the contrary with suggestions of seeking praise and an overt concern for appearances. The Affiliative style strongly supports my Humanistic-Encouraging style. I am relaxed, cooperative, helpful, diplomatic, sincere, and strongly support inclusion. It is also quite true that I value people much more highly than possessions, and also strive to help others in everything I do.... ...
The styles ask us what individual styles did each party use. The negotiation asks us are the parties able to negotiate with one another? Why or why not (Wilmot & Hocker, 2011)? As we know the case study is about the newlyweds disagreeing about domestic issues. The conflict builds out of control and shows an example of what miscommunication or poor communication styles leads to. Monica states “I have a real craving for pizza tonight. Or maybe we could go to the movies. Or maybe both!” (Davis, p. 1). Her statement was sort of the trigger for the conflict. Between Monica and Enrique’s relationship Enrique is the man of the house and Monica is the woman of the house. They both depots their roles in the house as far as what a typical household should look like. Enrique works really hard to provide for his new family and Monica works just as hard and does the house work. Their gender dictates their assigned roles within the house and it shows within their conflict. This in a way is important because it is the cause of the ongoing conflict and why it escalates. Enrique stays away from household chores meanwhile Monica submits and does them. At one point in the case study Enrique even states, “Ok. Ok. I’ll go see Jack for awhile, while you clean the house” (Davis, p.
Hocker & Wilmot, 2007, Poole, & Stutman, 2005 Folger and 2007 Cahn& Abigail. "Interpersonal Conflict and Conflict Management." Devito, Joseph A. The Interpersonal Communication Book. Boston: Pearson, Allyn & Bacon, 2009. 276.
In several occasions, conflict occurs in the communication of one or two people. Several people have thought of conflict as cases involving pouring of furious anger in a communication process. Nonetheless, conflict is the misinterpretation of an individual’s words or values (Huan & YAzdanifard, 2012). Conflict can also be due to limited resources in an organization (Riaz & Junaid, 2010). Conflict may as well arise due to poor communication or the use of inappropriate communication channel of transmission of information between the involved parties. Management of conflict has various conflict management styles that include avoidance style, forcing style, passive-aggressive style, accommodating style, collaborating style and compromising style. Workplace conflict comes in two different kinds: task involving conflict, which focuses on the approaches used in resolving the problem and blaming conflict that has the aspects of blame and never brings element of resolving problems between the conflicting parties. In the perception of several individuals, relationship conflict is negative.
Abigail, R. A., & Cahn, D. D. (2011). Managing conflict through communication. 4th Ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Edmondson, J. (2009). Let's be clear: How to manage communication styles. American Society for Training & Development, Inc., 63(9), 30-31. Retrieved from http"//go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE|A212767598&v=2.1&=novaseu_main&it=r&p=ITOF&sw=w&asid=0abb8dfff77dba5f747cb1b4c13a9d9f
In the world of communication, there are many theories which describe different ways people communicate. According to Doctor Thomas Hanitzsch, an associate professor of communication at the University of Munich in Germany, “Communication Theory is an international forum publishing high quality, original research into the theoretical development of communication from across a wide array of disciplines” (“Communication Theory”). A specific communication theory that will be highlighted is the Face-Negotiation theory developed by Stella Ting-Toomey. Simply stated, Dr. Ting-Toomey suggests that conflict is a consequence of identity management on an individual and cultural level, and occurs when an individual or group’s face is threatened. Similarly, people from individualistic, low context cultures interact differently from collectivist, high context cultures. This means that “people from collectivistic cultures with an interdependent self-image are concerned with giving ‘other-face’ or ‘mutual face,’ so they adopt a conflict style of ‘avoiding or integrating’” (Griffin “List”). Likewise, “people from individualistic cultures with an independent self-image are concerned with protecting self-face, so they adopt a conflict style of ‘dominating’” (Griffin “List”).
Its purpose is to give the participant a 4-letter formula which describes strength preferences of the participant’s personality type. The formula comes from four different sections; Extraversion or Introversion, Sensing or iNtuition, Thinking or Feeling, and Judging or Perceiving. Based on the 4-letter formula, one will also receive a two-letter Temperament, which offers a good prediction of one’s behavior (Kroeger, Thuesen, & Rutledge, 2002).
For example, when she is with her friends and coworkers she is very loud, always laughing and having a good time. I think that she is a higher middle to maybe a lower high in Agreeableness because she is easy going and gets along with anyone she meets or works with. She is always the one that comes up with things to do and I think that maybe once in a while she conforms to what her friends want to do. For Neuroticism I would say that she is on the low side because she is good at controlling her emotions, also I think she doesn’t let her emotions ruin her day. For instance, she had a bad day at work with rehearsals, after she was done with work she let it go and went on with the rest of her day.
Make conflict work. (2008, May 24). Winnipeg Free Press, G.1. Retrieved March 14, 2015, from ProQuest Central database. (Document ID: 1485216051).
The social conflict model has two types of conflict, the social consensus and the social conflict. Dalton took the concept of informal organization from just workers to include managers and is called managerial conflict. This is a power struggle of humans using conflict to control their environment and social activities within the organization in their favor. Dalton believes it is human to use conflict to your advantage. They’re several layers of conflicts that arise between coworkers, between departments, supervisor and worker, between staff members, between different groups within the larger organization and just good old personality conflicts. Rules are made to control conflicts and behavior, but who do they benefit. They are called organizational rules but individuals implement them and either favors the individual or his group within the group. Bendix did a study on 1956 about managerial ideologies. The managers or leaders use influence within the organization to get workers to follow them and work together for the company. They use this conflict of ideas to obtain loyalty, and employees who are loyal to their company. Sometimes conflict comes from outside the organization. An example of this theory outside influence is the National Football league and spousal and child abuse. A rash of abuse cases arising from the actions of the athletes, caused outside influences to take action against the National Football League. Women and other outside groups influenced the league to implement new rules to control or change the behavior of their employees, the
Managers and associates continually face conflict in the workplace. Using the five conflict resolution styles and knowing when to use them makes resolving differences easier.