Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays on restorative justice
Academic essays on restorative justice
Theories of conflict management
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essays on restorative justice
Conflict management is a strategized approach to understanding the complexity of conflict within any environment. Sources of conflict can derive from many avenues and include such things as scare resources to personal beliefs and work styles and lack of communication. Conflict is said to be inevitable and subjected to time and change. However, many organizations, including the federal department, have created functional methods through the use of historical theorist to become better aware of contribution and resolutions into conflict management. The criminal justice system within the United States have been subjected to many conflicts that hinder the progress of adaptability. What has been uncovered throughout decades of research is that human conflict is intertwined into the very fabric of our society, making it a formidable adversary. The United States Department of Justice and all inferior law enforcement agencies that is umbrella under this hierarchy is not exempt from conflict. Conflict management derives from historical events that have altered the current perception of conflict management and proposes a resolution method for many areas within the justice system. The conflict model is a primary example of the easiest forms of theoretical approaches to conflict management. Additional examples would include that of the consensus perceptive, the pluralist perspective, conflict perspective and restorative justice theories. Although each provides a certain field within the justice system with a more comprehensive approach, not all are equally beneficial in all areas. It is inevitable that the association of conflict is derived from societal change and perception plus approaches are manipulated accordingly as situations evolve. ... ... middle of paper ... ... style which is common practice in both the private and public working class. Although many conflicts stem from different ideologies, cultural understandings and personal perception, conflict is inevitable and subjected to the evolution of human beings without consideration of occupation and/or position within any organization, include the Justice System. Works Cited E.Kania, R. R. (2008). Historical Antecedents: Pioneers and Predecessors of Modern Public Service Management Theory. In R. R. E.Kania, Managing Criminal Justice Organizations: An Introduction to Theory & Practice (p. 42). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Kania, R. R. (2008). Evaluating, Appraising, and Assessing Performance: Change and Conflict. In R. R. Kania, Managing Criminal Justice Organizations: An Introduction to Theory and Practice (pp. 141-143). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
The human service model strives to integrate employees goals into organizational goals. However, it has such a reliance upon the most committed employees. These employees, therefore, must to accomplish job tasks and feel as though fulfilled in their distinctive roles within the criminal justice organizations. This model creates a much less centralized rules and bureaucracy as the supervisors and employees become part of a team governed by an agreement of purpose. Such agreement of purpose may appear to be blurred in terms of governance within the organization since it is in human nature to not wanting to share anything of values, especially money and power. Criminal justice organizations have multiple and sometimes conflicting goals. Those
This purpose of this paper is to interview a former Sergeant (Sgt) in the New Jersey police department, James Garber, to determine his thoughts on the current state of the criminal justice system. During this interview, Sgt Garber was asked several questions regard the current state of the criminal justice system; specifically, in what ways is the system working, in what ways is the system failing, and what direction he sees the justice system going. As part of this, he explains why he feels this way about the justice system, to include specific examples to support his belief. In addition to Sgt Garber’s opinion on these matters, this analysis includes real world examples that support the problems he identifies. Lastly, this paper
Schmalleger, F. (2009). The Conflict Perspective. In F. Schmalleger, Criminology: An Intergrative Introduction (p. 347). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
61-86 Wood, D. & MacAlister, D., “Accountable, Responsive and Independent: On the Need for Balance in Police Governance”, International Journal of Police Science and Management, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2005, pp. 197-207
In several occasions, conflict occurs in the communication of one or two people. Several people have thought of conflict as cases involving pouring of furious anger in a communication process. Nonetheless, conflict is the misinterpretation of an individual’s words or values (Huan & YAzdanifard, 2012). Conflict can also be due to limited resources in an organization (Riaz & Junaid, 2010). Conflict may as well arise due to poor communication or the use of inappropriate communication channel of transmission of information between the involved parties. Management of conflict has various conflict management styles that include avoidance style, forcing style, passive-aggressive style, accommodating style, collaborating style and compromising style. Workplace conflict comes in two different kinds: task involving conflict, which focuses on the approaches used in resolving the problem and blaming conflict that has the aspects of blame and never brings element of resolving problems between the conflicting parties. In the perception of several individuals, relationship conflict is negative.
Management Strategies in Criminal Justice Organizations: Enhancing Collaboration, Budget Efficiency, and Ethical Decision-Making. Introduction Effective management within criminal justice organizations ensures public safety, upholds the rule of law, and fosters community trust. This paper delves into essential management strategies for criminal justice organizations, drawing insights from scholarly literature, including "Criminal Justice Organizations: Administration and Management" by Stan Stojkovic, David Kalinich, and John Klofas. By addressing questions related to communication enhancement, budget management, and ethical decision-making, this paper aims to provide comprehensive guidance for optimizing organizational effectiveness. Enhancing
The Foundation Coalition. (2011). Understanding Conflict and Conflict Management. Retrieved July 4, 2011 from http://www.foundationcoalition.org/publications/brochures/conflict.pdf
The conflict theory is seen commonly every where. The ground work of this theory can be seen in may different places, both in criminal justice and out of criminal justice. The ground work, the first layer of the conflict theory, is that it is an imposing threat on ideas, standards, behaviors, and anything else that
This approach takes concepts from both scientific management and human relations management to include not only management of personnel, but also management of organizational knowledge. In my opinion systems management is probably the most effective style of management in criminal justice agencies because it promotes unity and mutual respect in the workforce without undermining the need to accomplish goals for the sake of production. In a field like criminal justice where there are vast numbers of specialized divisions, open communication and cooperation between these units can be highly beneficial. Scientific management, while technically efficient, is too tedious and inattentive of workers physical and emotional needs. Human relations, while attentive to employees feelings, is too lax for the criminal justice system wherein accomplishment is not just for production, but for the safety and effectiveness of society as a
“Collaboration is the process of working together to achieve a common goal that is impossible to reach without the efforts of others.” Rather than trusting single agencies to solve their respective problems, it recognizes that many criminal justice problems are universal and require a coordinated and collaborative response to the most pressing issues facing our justice system today. Collaborative justice corporations—and the ability to share information, develop common goals, and create compatible internal policies to support those goals—have significant potential to positively impact crime, increase public confidence, and reduce costs throughout the justice system. Court community and criminal justice professionals join forces to analyze
Furlong, G. T. (2005). The conflict resolution toolbox: Models and maps for analyzing, diagnosing, and resolving conflict. Ontario, Canada: John Wiley & Sons.
Kania, R., & Davis, R. P. (2012). Managing criminal justice organizations: an introduction to theory and practice (2nd ed.). Waltham, MA: Anderson Pub.
In criminal justice law enforcement officers are expected to reduce crime in an efficient manner and administrators are expected to produce more efficiency with less money. Individuals must be recognized in some manner in order to continue motivation for job performance. Administrators will need to continue to set reasonable goals for an organization. In the criminal justice system this can be done through showing officers the personal rewards they will receive for performance of their duties. When officers encounter citizens it is usually when the citizen is at their worst. The way an officer handles a situation may influence the offender to change his way of life and stay out of the criminal justice system in the future. When law enforcement personnel see this as a reward their performance of duties will be enhanced and the goals of the organization will be reached in turn helping the administrator succeed (Samina 's Forum for Police Support,
Stojkovic, Kalinich & Klofas, (2012). Criminal Justice Organization: Administration and management. (5th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Therefore, they see conflict management as a stage in the handling of conflicts, which could be followed by later stages. It could be concluded, therefore, that the main trend in conflict studies is to define conflict management as being on the same level as conflict settlement or containment. In other words, the general view of conflict management is that it is less advanced or that it covers a narrower range of treatment of conflict in comparison with other, more ambitious or advanced methods of dealing with this problem. Fisher et al. states that while they make “no claim” that there is a “universally accepted” typology for the methods used in addressing conflict, there are “consistent” terms, seen as “steps in a process" and "each step taken includes the previous one.”