Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dealing with adversity in the workplace
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dealing with adversity in the workplace
The Discourse Community of Chemistry Ph.D. Students
The chemistry Ph.D. program is designed to advance students’ cognitive skills and should ultimately afford them the ability to become independent thinkers. When the students join the Ph.D. program they soon become members of a discourse community, which is a group of members that share the same values, goals, and lexis. Especially in the science disciplines the students become immersed in their new group by exploring various research projects and conducting experiments that will hopefully propel their scientific curiosity exponentially before they graduate. One of the primary goals for students within this program is to produce research publications in order for the students to
…show more content…
One of the methods was by finding another member of the community you can feel comfortable with and ultimately confide in so that can express your feelings to someone in the same situation (Smith). The importance of peer support was also mentioned by Gardner as she explained the students relied upon “the graduate student grapevine” that was a method of communicating with one another (724). The consensus she received from the students was that “students look to one another for support, friendship, and…for guidance in their programs through the graduate student grapevine” (Gardner 736). In addition to spending time with some of their peers both of the students agreed that one of the primary ways the deal with the tension was “to start stripping down your beliefs of the advisor” (Smith). The students explained that this meant that collectively they began to understand the dysfunctional relationship they had with their advisor was also shared by many of their fellow peers. Therefore, as Mays explained the PI had “lost his credibility in our eyes because he acts this way with everyone.” Thus, he stated that it allowed him to feel more confident and to ultimately take more control over his research (Mays). However, it is important to note that this did not correct his relationship with the PI, but instead helped him …show more content…
After analyzing the causes of the tension between grad students and their PI it is important to bring forth the issues that can arise because of the constant friction. As Leonard Cassuto, an English Professor from Fordham University, explained that when the environment the advisor helps to create is mostly filled with frustration, it can sometimes cause the students to drop out from the graduate program at the alarming rate of approximately 50% of students across several different disciplines (1). Both of the grad students I met with explained that recently one of their peers exited the program primarily due to a lack of communication between him and the PI (Mays and Smith). Additionally, as Mays explained the actions and behavior of their advisor has caused him and several of his peers to battle periods of depression during their time in the program, and that the depression had forced he and several other students to seek
In the article “Chem 20” Ellen Goodman addresses current and future medical students that they should not be in this line of work if their only desire is a possibility of a big check in the future. Goodman initially uses high diction before employing symbolism and concluding using verisimilitude in order to bring the reader to a better understanding that students should not only be in it for the money and sometimes the ‘big check’ never comes. She purposely directs her message towards her audience to signify that being a doctor is more than a check.
Barry successfully conveys the many traits that scientists will endure in their work, and the qualities essential in order to be successful by using three effective rhetorical devices-- exemplification, powerful diction, and insightful figurative language. He uses his experience with the flu epidemic and rhetorical strategies to prove his claim that there is much more to science
Overall, John M. Barry was able to define and characterize scientific research. Using rhetorical strategies such as, comparison, specific diction, and contrast Barry is able to show how scientific research is uncertainty
When one engages in writing they are able to look upon their lives in a new perspective. One separates from roles and statuses of daily life, community’s, and experiences at particular time and place. This idea of stepping outside or beyond ones recognized community and structure of life presents the opportunity to recreate and voice identity and stories in new ways. In Joseph Harris’ Book A Teaching Subject there is a chapter on this idea of community and composition. Basically, Harris argues against the idea of a coherent, unified academic discourse community. He expresses the difference between the ‘language’ of the university and ‘language’ of students/individuals. This disconnect between them presents difficulty in figuring out and understanding why people would move in between the two. People are members of many communities in their daily lives and this means have many discourse communities. Adding additional ones does n...
In Scotland, summer of 2012, Melissa Marshall spoke at a TED Talk titled “Talk Nerdy to me”. In this short and direct speech, she illustrated to the audience the importance of being knowledgeable of what was occuring in the scientific field. Coinciding with that, she said that scientists should want and need to make that knowledge accessible and comprehensible to the public. In her mind, it would be beneficial to everyone if scientists involved the public in discoveries about great issues in our world such as health care, the environment, energy resources, etc. In order to build a bridge of communication, Marshall outlined some general tips for scientists and engineers on how to better bring the public into their wonderland.
The article “Chemistry of Winemaking: A unique Lecture Demonstration” by L. B. Church of the State University of New York, seeks to demonstrate how the winemaking process can be used as a teaching tool. Found in the Journal of Chemical Education, the text uses an instructive and formal tone while discussing the process and how it might relate to the classroom. His rhetoric leans heavily toward the use of logic. Aimed for chemistry teachers, the article refrains from using step-by-step demonstrations of each and every process, and instead discusses the use of common techniques that could be used within the framework of Winemaking. By guiding the readers through the general process, the author makes it seem a logical and easy to implement demonstration that would capture and maintain the interest of students. He does this with a noticeable lack of appeals toward pathos and ethos, and indeed, there are absolutely none of the tried and true tools of persuasion. I believe this is a deliberate act on Church’s part to accommodate his discourse community of chemists. The community has little interest in how someone may feel about any given subject, and instead desires the facts behind that subject so that they may draw their own conclusions. The discourse community is interested in what you started with, what you did with it, and what you observed during and after the process. Then, and only then, should the conclusions derived from that information be given. Even after having done so, a writer in the scientific community must be prepared to be proven wrong, as that is the nature of science. As such, attempts to persuade via emotion tend to be ineffective, and would often be better spent presenting your arguments, and so I feel that the ...
Listening is a vital and important part of communication. While speaking clearly and concisely is imperative, true listening is central to speaking with mindfulness and in the case of the counselor, this mindfulness has the possibility of leading clients to their own solutions to life’s tough circumstances. In his book, Petersen (2007) breaks down the communication cycle so that we can be aware of how we react when people share their emotions with us, and how to effectively communicate by listening and speaking in turn to build strong and supportive relationships, whether they are personal or professional.
Schlager, Neil, and Josh Lauer. Science and Its Times: Understanding the Social Significance of Scientific Discovery. Detroit: Gale Group, 2000. Print.
College life can be quite the adjustment for most new students. When entering the collegiate atmosphere, there are new, sometimes unspoken, social rules and norms. With so many new social elements for students to acclimate to, already difficult situations, such as any form of conflict, are often particularly difficult to address. Fortunately, with a clear understanding of the various forms of conflict management, new students can learn to effectively communicate regarding any subject matter they may encounter.
All throughout, I had to be willing to be vulnerable as well. I had to remember that building relationships, and supporting the system, meant that I had to continuously be willing to keep myself open and transparent as well. As a peer advisor, I once had to engage with a student about my experience with the LGBTQ community at Duke, and how that community supported me throughout my transition. This student opened up about their experience at home, and at Duke, and I had to be willing to share my experience with them – in hopes that they could see a place for themselves at Duke. After this conversation, I began to see this student open up about their personal life, and become more comfortable with them across campus. My vulnerability started a conversation that did not
Conflicts and adversity arise every day, relationships form and come to an end, different doors of opportunities open while others slam shut. There is very little a person can do to avoid adversities in life. It is the reactions to these adversities that truly influence a person and are essential for growth and success to form from the situation. I have been faced with various adversities in my life, and one of the adversities I have been continuously been facing has been my college career thus far.
836). My mother became my father and I’s outlet for support and advice (H. Pham, personal communication, October 4, 2015). We would confide in her when we were frustrated with each other. Although she allowed us to release our anger and tension, it did not resolve the interpersonal problems that my father and I had together. The third person can actually distract the dyad from resolving their problems (Haefner, 2014, p.
This was especially necessary as one of the key issues that the students were feeling were a disconnect from faculty and staff and a dissatisfaction with the lack of organization in a professional degree program. While these are issues that are not necessarily difficult to put forward, students felt that once they attempted to communicate this to the university staff it was quickly shut down and misjudged. In some cases, the reaction of university staff was condescending and unjustified, an issue that was also presented in the student group discussions. Joe’s role as a mediator created a necessary neutral body to convey the information to both parties involved. It was also necessary for him to not be directly involved with either of the parties and therefore lacked any deep understanding of the issues at hand. This allowed him to create an unbiased environment to rely the information to each party as it were
I have always been inspired by the workings of chemistry and mathematics. My studies of these subjects have developed my understanding and have made me pursue my interest in these two topics. I want to take up chemistry as it involves a large amount of mathematics which I value and understand to be challenging, yet very enjoyable, as there is always an alternative route to obtain the answer. Additionally, I am drawn to the course because it is a mixture of all these exacting subjects, forming a degree that is very demanding and stimulating. Chemists are constantly thinking of new ways to produce viable drugs containing different isomers to improve the pharmaceutical sector using mathematical equations. Chemistry is about innovation, applying information to new areas and how to do things better than they were before, the degree appeals to and fascinates me.
Central to the heart of P4C lies the notion of a community of inquiry. Originally a term from Pierce to reference interaction among scientists, the concept of "COI" dominates the discussion of educational revisionism as presented by commentators on the P4C movement. The key description marking a COI is: a group (a social setting) of individuals who use dialogue (interaction among participants) to search out the problematic borders of a puzzling concept (inquiry as philosophical.) Implicit in the ideal workings of this group are two key concepts: