Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Argument for and against censorship
Argument for and against censorship
Pros and cons of censorship that effects society
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Argument for and against censorship
“Censorship is the child of fear and the father of ignorance”. – Laurie Henderson. By banning books, it can deprive children the information or the mental nourishment they will need for life. Personally, it’s not the best objective for children to be brought up and not know the capabilities of the real world. Due to that, when a child grows up and goes out into the world they wouldn’t be as efficient on how to handle themselves on their own, due to the “protected state of mind” that they were taught. Many parents believe that by censoring and or banning books could prevent children from being too exposed to inappropriate content. Although, that might seem like the best choice for the child it could do more harm than good. Even though, …show more content…
According, to People for the American way foundation, “Our basic right — the freedom to express ourselves as we see fit — is guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States’ Constitution, ensuring the freedom to express one’s opinion even if that opinion might be considered unpopular or unorthodox.” People believe that children wouldn’t read books that have profanity, sexualities…etc. Even though many have become apprehensive of these books, most of the books have been proven more than once that censorship is still very much active today. Ranging from books such as: “Bridge to Terabithia” for its use of profanity, and some books about religion such as Christmas or other Christian holidays, according to http://content.time.com/time/nation/article/ A librarian spoke on the issues of the use of censoring books saying “banning or censoring books is certainly not a new concept in any kind of library. All libraries have specific policies that are followed in selecting books for inclusion in the …show more content…
The banning of books, could potentially cause people especially younger readers to form the lack of creativity due to the protected state of mind that they were taught. According, to a librarian “It's more important for us to think about how we should be educating our students to make good choices, to know what is worthwhile and to be able to think logically and weigh all ideas in order to choose wisely.”
Personally, I believe that people should be able to read whatever they please, but I do believe that you shouldn’t let a 6-year-old read “The Color Purple”, but when they get mature enough for the real-world topics, parents should expose their kids to these books, so that when the child goes out into the world they can be more aware of what to look out
The Constitution states: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances." Even though books may influence young minds with negative thinking, society shouldn’t ban books because it prohibits learning and it violates the First Amendment in the Constitution. Banning books takes away the author’s right, some books can be very educational, and it takes away the children’s choice of what they get to read.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
...in restrictions are needed. Pornography should not be available to children. I do not have a problem with parental advisory labels on music. However, putting a ban on all books is a very scary proposition. Bradbury's novel does not come close to describing how miserable this world would become. Everybody in this world depends on books whether or not they are literate. It can be said that we get most of our morals and values from books. These morals are found in books such as the Bible, Aesop's Fables, and sometimes even the trashy romance novels that women tend to love. Without books, the world could be explained in one word, educated. An uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict. An uneducated world is a world at constant war. A world with out books is a dystopian world.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials… of images, ideas, and information…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school should read the book in dispute. Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many others ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries.
We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional.
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
The Houston Chronicle, pp. C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article emphasizes the point that censors go too far when they attempt to not only ban a book for their own children but want to remove it altogether from a school library, so that other students cannot read it.
Although banning books is a good thing to do, because you don’t want to expose bad things to kids, they also don’t have to learn or fear bad issues at a younger age. However kids will either way get exposed to bad issues, they can learn from a reliable source instead of made-up information, and according to Source 2, we need to educate kids because banning books takes that ability away from them. I still believe that banning books isn’t a good idea because the government should not tell us which book to read. Either are parents or ourselves should make the
Bookshelf to Banned Censorship has been an issue in society for a very long time now. Censorship and book banning has been around since people started writing on paper, and is still a problem today. It is mainly relevant in society at schools. Schools ban books because they think the material being read is not appropriate for the students. Even though schools are trying to protect children from reading inappropriate content, they should not ban books because it is un- American and books can help people through hard times.
Censoring books deprives people of the freedom to explore the world of knowledge. , An example being a book by Harper Lee called To Kill a Mockingbird was banned from schools due to the use of profanity and racial content. Some people may believe that books should be off the shelves because of the content it contains. Clearly, certain materials, such as books, should not be banned or censored because people should have freedom to read what they want and banning books limits ideas and creativity. One of the many reasons that books should not be be prohibited is that people should have the freedom to gain knowledge about what they want.
Evidently what my point is coming to that in my opinion the main aspect to Censorship is to protect children to content that they should not be exposed to at such a young age. Censorship in some circumstances is not needed. In one circumstance books have been banned because they have been too inappropriate. For example Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs, this book was banned because it contained obscene language and controversial matters. I do not think this booked should have banned in this case. It’s an adult book in which it’s aimed at adult. If an adult wants to read the book and they have no problem with what the book contains then it should be their decision whether to read it or not. An adult should be able to make their own decisions on whether they want to read that type of material. Some people like to read controversial material for example 50 shades of Grey is a very popular book which has been a best seller in the UK. This book is a very controversial book and explores sex and S&M. People may see this as having an explicit nature. So why has Naked Lunch been banned and 50 shades hasn’t? In this circumstanced I think it is wrong that books are banned. It shouldn’t of been published in the first place and the publishers should have looked into the
Have you ever picked up a book from your local library or school library to later read and realize the content inside was shocking? Many students have been in this situation before, picking out a book that interested them from a library or school library, only to find the contents of the book unnerving; such books should not be so easily accessible from libraries and schools. Many people believe it should be up to a parent to control what their child does or does not read. This statement is true, parents should keep an eye on what their child is reading, however, if students have easy access to books that their parents may not want them reading, it limits just how much a parent can control what their children reads. This means that certain books should be banned from schools and libraries because most students in schools are under the age of