Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is the First Amendment Important
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Banning Books is completely disappointing. My opinion on banning books is that I’m against it. There are three statements I have to claim for being against banning books. Parents have the control of the kid, affects the 1st amendment (freedom of religion), and learning from a reliable source instead of a made up one from friends.
In addition, parents are the legal guardians of the child so they have the right to make their kid read or not read the book. The kids look up to their parents, so if the parents tell them what is right and what is wrong then they should listen and follow it. According to Source 2, the mother of a Muslim child did not want her son reading books about Christmas or other Christian holiday’s. The son was in high school and the parent was asking the teacher to ban him from reading those books. “I told the parent that I can’t
…show more content…
tell him not to read those books, I said that you should teach your child which book is right and wrong” says Sharon Coatney. For instance, banning books affect the freedom of religion.
Religious books could talk about things they shouldn’t know about but it still helps with their culture. Also banning books is affected by “freedom of speech and choice which is blocked by the 1st amendment” (Source 5). The author can’t get their opinion on their book. Freedom of choice is also blocking banning books because, people get to choose which book to read. For example a 13 year-old should be reading a 16 year-old book if they want to learn something that will help them succeed in life.
Although banning books is a good thing to do, because you don’t want to expose bad things to kids, they also don’t have to learn or fear bad issues at a younger age. However kids will either way get exposed to bad issues, they can learn from a reliable source instead of made-up information, and according to Source 2, we need to educate kids because banning books takes that ability away from them. I still believe that banning books isn’t a good idea because the government should not tell us which book to read. Either are parents or ourselves should make the
decision. My opinion on banning books is that I’m against it because parent shave control of their kid, it affects the 1st amendment (freedom of religion and choice), and learning from a reliable sources instead of made up. There are many reasons for banning books but my reason stands that banning books should not happen according to my reasons.
In order to understand how banning books in schools affect student learning, it is important to understand why books are banned in the first place. If parents describe a book as inappropriate or offensive for children, they can complain about it to the school district to have it banned. If the school district agrees with the parents, they will ban the book from the school curriculum and forbid teachers from teaching the book to students. Parents might think that the book goes against religious or moral...
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
...in restrictions are needed. Pornography should not be available to children. I do not have a problem with parental advisory labels on music. However, putting a ban on all books is a very scary proposition. Bradbury's novel does not come close to describing how miserable this world would become. Everybody in this world depends on books whether or not they are literate. It can be said that we get most of our morals and values from books. These morals are found in books such as the Bible, Aesop's Fables, and sometimes even the trashy romance novels that women tend to love. Without books, the world could be explained in one word, educated. An uneducated world is a miserable world full of fighting and conflict. An uneducated world is a world at constant war. A world with out books is a dystopian world.
"Book Banning." Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 31 Jan. 2011.
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Banning Books “It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional.
...parents. Most people don’t know how bad book-banning has become; I for one thought book-banning was a thing of the past. But even as our society changes and people become more open to ideas, it is still a big problem. Unfortunately, those very people (teachers and librarians) who should be fighting against book-banning passively let it happen for fear that they will get in trouble and lose their job. As Judy Blume also said, “The real danger is not in the books, but in laughing off those who would ban them.” Unless someone fights against book-banning, eventually kids won’t have anything to read.
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
The idea of banning books are to protect our children from having their minds be poisoned of fictional ideas from fantasy books, safe from violence, protected from adult contents that are too early for them to know about.
All in all, throughout our society ideas, morals, and lessons are thought through books and if books are being banished from our schools, then we are all being deprived of our freedom as intellectuals that have the own opinions and ideas. In fact if books teach students lessons and if this books are abolished then lessons, ideas and real events of the real world are also banished from students. After all, who is the right person to censor book?
The Diary of Anne Frank, The Scarlet Letter, and To Kill a Mockingbird all have something in common. These books not only have been staples in english curriculum across the nation for many years, but they also have been banned and challenged time after time for their content. Although theses novels teach valuable lessons, some people cannot seem to look past certain parts of their plots. Many groups have taken action to ban an abundance of books that they personally feel people should not be exposed to. Banning books prevents a well rounded education, takes away the right to choose what to read, and will ultimately have no real purpose because people will be exposed to