Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

692 Words2 Pages

We live in an overprotective society, where people try to control other people’s lives from things that they find explicit. Many parents believe that by sheltering their kids from offensive things it will keep them safe. But, trying to live life as if there is always sunshine and no rain turns out to be a big disappointment. The banning of books has a negative effect on children and adults alike, as it can shelter children from real life situations, and revokes the rights of the people. Although people believe in banning books that contain vulgar language and profanity to help their children, it can actually hurt the child and can be considered unconstitutional. Those who believe in banning books with explicit content deny the rights of the author. The first amendment specifically states that we have the freedom of speech and press, which means that banning books actually goes against the United State’s constitution. Correspondingly, California’s Supreme Court case of Evans versus Selma Union High School District of Fresno County ruled in favor of the King James’ version of the bible. The court stated, “The fact that the King James’ version is commonly …show more content…

People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children. Banned Books Week.” Banned Books Week: Celebrating the Freedom to Read American Library Association, 21st Sept. 2005. Web.02 March 2016 Notable First Amendment Court Cases: Evans v. Selma Union High School of Fresno County American Library Association, 1924. April

More about Persuasive Essay Of Banning Books

Open Document