Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A essay on censorship
Censorship in america 1950- present
A essay on censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The subject of censorship is a very controversial one, especially the banning of books. Many people believe they must protect themselves and others from the "evils" of many classic books and works of art because they can be deemed "indecent" in one way or another. Many believe that this is absurd and censorship in its current form is a violation of our First Amendment right to free speech. Personally, I align myself with the latter, however I do feel there are occasions where censorship is justifiable.
The censorship of books is a division of censorship that, apart from Internet censorship, receives the most publicity. Banning books is the most popular form of such censorship. Many banned books are literary classics, such as The Catcher in the Rye, by J.D. Salinger, which was listed as the number 6 most challenged or banned book in a list compiled by the American Civil Liberties Union in 1997.
This book has been banned from school libraries all over the country because of the main character's teenage angst, which many feel is too graphic for teenagers, and its profanity. Profanity, whether it be frequent or a rare occurrence, is a characteristic of many literary classics, as is the use of racial epithets.In the book Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain (ranking number 2 on the list), an epithet is use many times over to describe the people of color in the book. Now since the book was published in 1885 and such language was common at the time, I do not belie...
Censorship, as defined in the dictionary, is, in the case of a book, to take out things thought to be objectionable. Censorship is far more than that. This mere word prohibits us from all things
There is a major argument among literary critics whether Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn is or is not a racist novel. The question boils down to the depiction of Jim, the black slave, and to the way he is treated by Huck and others. In the 1950s the effort to banish The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn from required classroom reading lists came publicly to the floor again, not chiefly on the grounds that its depiction of black characters and the use of the word “nigger” were demeaning to African-American students. Many feel that Twain uses the word too loosely. However, many believe that Huck Finn should be taught in schools on the grounds that the novel’s racist theme accurately depicted what life was like for a slave in pre- Civil War times.
Mark Twain published what scholars still consider one of the greatest American literary works in 1885, and in that same year it suffered its first banning (Zwick). “Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is essential to the understanding of the American soul,” Victor Doyno states on the jacket of Random House’s comprehensive edition of the novel. If Huckleberry Finn is so indispensable, then its having been opposed from the beginning of its life seems more than a little surprising. At first, the strife was caused by many objecting to the friendship between Huckleberry Finn, the white protagonist, and Jim, an escaped African American slave, in addition to the grammar upon which many critics of the time frowned. As our society experiences changes in priorities, taboos, and social trends, the points of concern shift, and no longer do critics grimace at an interracial friendship; instead, they attack the racism supposedly present (Chadwick).
Countries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials… of images, ideas, and information…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school should read the book in dispute. Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many others ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries.
Thesis: Although some people believe that censorship is adequate to select what things does the society will be good and can live around it while others believe that there should be no censorship because it takes away your right of expression of freedom.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
How would it feel to be told a certain book can’t be read? Believe it or not, book banning is a real thing. A real, horrible thing. There are many reasons why this censorship should not be allowed. Banning books interferes with constitutional rights, children’s education, and parental control.
Since it was first published in 1885, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, has been challenged, banned from schools, and is now causing controversy as it is newly censored in response to the appearance of the ‘N-Word’ 219 times within this classic novel. Schools question its appropriacy and politically correctness, often countering the book because it contains either information, ideas, or language that conflict with their own values and beliefs. However, by using the "N" word in Huckleberry Finn, it reminds the reader that blatant racism was the accepted social norm of the day in which the novel is set, exposing Twain’s underlying challenge to casual and accepted racism that cannot be seen by the eyes of a superficial reader. It
“The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” has been denounced upon release due to its choice of language and more controversial in the 20th century because of its portrayal of racial stereotypes and the constant display of the racial slur, the N-word. Mark Twain is also questioned for his portrayal of the stereotypical treatment of Blacks. However, the book is still popular among readers and is praised for its realism and honest portrayal of attitudes during that time period. “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” examines the perception of race and identity. Surely, the novel is a masterpiece and displays an essential role of American identity. Conversely, the anti-racism in the book cannot be seen if the reader is not able to grasp the concept of the ironic narrator. Therefore, the book should be available for those who wish to read it by their choice. Nevertheless, due to the offensive language the text should not be presented as required classroom material. Twain’s diction and characterization by the display of the use of racial slurs and stereotypical treatment of black slaves in “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,” distracts from the positive impact on racial attitudes; therefore, this
Censorship should be something that people and businesses choose to do on their own, for their own reasons. The media should never be allowed to censor anything, because it is their job to provide information, not hide it. Businesses should decide whether or not to apply censorship as a business model, based on what they believe that the customers want, not based on any law that one thing or another should never be seen or There cannot be too much free speech, the more the better. Everyone everywhere should always have the right to say whatever they want. People should also be allowed to argue with people whose opinions the dislike.
Our system for banning books is flawed. Classic books are important to readers. The religion you in believe will play a factor on what people think about books. Therefore, the law will limit parents ability on banning books. Banning books is outrageous and should not be accepted.
One of our greatest freedoms as Americans is under attack, the freedom to read. The freedom to read and write what we want is essential to the sharing of ideas and how our country is operated. Books are censored today because some people want to avoid controversial views and moral corruption. If books are constantly removed in order to shield people from controversial views, then our very own freedom is stripped away. Americans must be trusted to make their own decisions about what they read and follow. For the most part, banning books inhibits the sharing of new ideas by limiting our freedom to read what we want.
Despite all the criticism, of racism and other questionable material for young readers, Mark Twain’s The Adventure of Huckleberry Finn is a superbly written novel, which in the opinion of this reviewer should not be remove the literary cannon. Twain’s novel is a coming of age story that teaches young people many valuable lessons and to some extend makes students reexamine their own lives and morals. The most common argument for its removal from the literary canon is that the novel is too racist; it offends black readers, perpetuates cheap slave-era stereotypes, and deserves no place on today’s bookshelves. However one must ask if Twain is encouraging traditional southern racism or is Twain disputing these idea.
Banning the book from the shelves and classrooms seems unnecessary for many people. Many people believe the book should not be banned but only modified to replace the “N-word” with the word “slave.” With the modification, people claim that the book would still send its message across, yet in a less offensive way. Mark Twain scholars believe that the modification will make the book more adaptable for teaching and it will still manage to send it’s message across, without the need of the “N-word.” Professor of Syracuse University, Boyce Watkins, stated in The Joey Behar Show that there is censorship present in our society already in “movies, television, and other forms of art” and that censorship on a book is not an exception. Modifying the book