Autism Group Correlation Paper

The findings used in this study help the researchers to determine the correlations, analysis of variance, allied tests and percentage of responses using the Likert scale in the disability and non-disability group. In the correlation data, the families well-beings represent the correlation between the Down Syndrome and Autism groups. Brown found that only five family's well-being was significant in the Autism group, while only seven in the Down Syndrome group. At the same time, four of the families well-being in the Down Syndrome groups shared significance with the Autism group. Overall the Autism group showed a higher correlation than the Down Syndrome group. The author suggests that family relations, leisure, and enjoyment of life, careers and preparing for careers and health are

Above all, health, and careers and preparing for careers had the control group significantly different with the Down Syndrome and Autism groups. The result of families, financial well-being had the control group differed significantly from Down Syndrome and Autism groups. In contrast, the support from other people presented in having significant differences between Down Syndrome and control group, and, the autism and the control group. Also, leisure and enjoyment of life had statistical differences between the Autism and control groups, but not with Down Syndrome and control groups. Down Syndrome group only presents four family's well-being below the 50% satisfaction level and only six family's well-being below the satisfaction cutoff point. In the non-disability group, they had eight quality of life domains below the 50% satisfaction level. The authors measured the families' responses in the disability and non-disability groups by using the Likert scale. In the disability groups, the families responded differently to the issue of support from disability-related services. The author reports 44% autism group was unsatisfied, and 48% down syndrome were either satisfied or very